This essay and others are available for syndication.
Contact Us for more information.

A Question – Believe It or Not – That Haunted Me for Years! 

Years ago, when I was actively writing short stories, I sent a dozen of them to the brother of a friend for a critique. He (the brother) was an award-winning Canadian author of novels and short stories.

Since a few of my earlier stories had received positive comments from published fiction writers who were kind enough to review them at writing conferences, I was hoping for positive feedback, since the ones I sent him (the brother) were more mature. And he was positive about some of them. But he criticized others as “anecdotes” rather than “stories.” I should have asked him what he meant by that. Instead, I spent years trying to figure it out on my own.

All those with literary ambitions believe they have at least one novel inside them waiting to be put into print and stun the world. The great majority of such people never write their stories. And of those that do, I’d wager that 90 percent of them are written as anecdotes.

What’s the difference between a “genuine” work of fiction and an anecdote?

I figured it out, finally, just recently by reading a “story” sent to me by a family member. It was a first-person account of interesting aspects of his life, strung together in a sophisticated way with a strong sense of style and abundant literary diction. It was the sort of thing you would expect to read in The New Yorker.

But I could see that it was an anecdote. It was an anecdote because it was written the way anecdotes are told – about an incident in the person’s life that he/she found relevant and memorable.

Let me try to rephrase that as a formal definition: Anecdotes are first-person, autobiographical accounts formulated and recited to document some significant-to-that person incident or incidents in his/her life. However well-written and however literary the style, the distinguishing feature of anecdotes is that they are essentially memories, embellished by pride and shame and the desire to document and validate the teller’s existence.

I published my “stories” that were the closest to actual stories in my book Dreaming of Tigers. I saved the anecdotes – dozens of them – to be reworked when I figured out how to do it. So now, I’m going to go revisit the best of them.

My initial strategy will be to revise them from the first to the third person. I’m hoping that will force me to rethink the characters and the plot from the reader’s point of view. Then I’ll read them again with these questions in mind:

* This may be interesting to me. But will it be interesting to the reader?

* This is meaningful to me. But how can I make it meaningful to the reader?

Continue Reading

For Your Possible Enjoyment 

Call Me Chihiro 
Directed by Rikiya Imaizumi
Initial release (Japan) Feb. 23, 2023

I usually recommend to you only “A” films – those that I would score at the top of my personal grading scale. But on Oct. 13, realizing that there’s not much difference between a B+ on my scale and an A- on someone else’s, I presented three “B” Netflix offerings that you may like a little better than I did. Call Me Chihiro is another one like that.

The Plot: A former prostitute, Chihiro, is rebuilding her life in a small seaside town. She now works in a bento shop, where she imperceptibly changes the lives of her new customers.

My Rating: Because Kasumi Arimura, who plays the lead, is utterly irresistible, I give it a B+.

You can watch the trailer here.

Continue Reading

Quick Bites 

Oct. 7, 2023 – The Day the Delusions Died. In 1987, Thomas Sowell published A Conflict of Visions, which, among other things, provided an intriguing explanation of why people disagree about politics. The foundation of our disagreement, he says, is the disagreement we have about human nature. He argued that there are two fundamentally different ways of looking at the world, one of which he called “unconstrained” and the other “constrained.” Click here for an explanation of this as it relates to the Israel-Hamas War.

Another Hint on the “Handoff” to Newsom. Biden’s leaking it now… Click here.

John Stossel Looks into the Epidemic of “Food Insecurity.” On Nov. 14, I wrote about this crazy new problem that has been worried about in the past several years in The New York TimesThe Washington Post, and other left-leaning media. I said the term was a fabricated crisis issued by political and other organizations that make a living by selling the myth that there are millions of Americans going to bed or waking up hungry. And I’m not the only one talking about this idiocy. John Stossel recently did a documentary about it. He talks about it here.

The Most Dangerous Bird in the World. From AS: “The Cassowary, a flightless bird that lives in the forests in Australia, could kick either of our asses even when we were in our prime. They are six feet six inches tall and can weigh about 170. Holy shit! Look it up.” I looked it up. Click here.

How well would you eat on a trip overseas? I thought I’d do a lot better on this quiz. I got only 13 right, and at least three of those were guesses. I guess I’m not as worldly as I thought! Click here.

Continue Reading

Evidence on the Adverse Effects of the COVID Vaccines Is Piling Up 

Who’s Counting? Many drugs and medical procedures have adverse reactions. That includes radiation and chemotherapy for cancer. The sensible and historic response to reports of these adverse reactions is to record them (which is done by the WHO and other organizations), study them, and then compare them – in terms of how common they are and how serious they are – to their positive reactions (benefits). Can you guess how many adverse reactions to the mRNA vaccinations have been recorded since 2001? Click here.

“Unassailable Proof” from an MIT ProfessorIn March 2023, MIT Professor Retsef Levi disclosed data acquired by the Israeli Ministry of Health. In his Nov. 5 newsletter, Steve Kirsch, a longtime critic of the Biden administration’s COVID policies, presented key components of that data, which demonstrates that (1) “the mortality risk curve” is the opposite in slope to what it would be if the vaccines were safe, (2) the risk of death “monotonically increases” after the COVID vaccinations, and (3) the risk of death increases “exponentially” with each shot.” His conclusion: The Israeli data is “unassailable proof the vaccines are killing people.” Click here.

The Most Censored Chart in Congressional History. On Jan. 25, 2022, Sen. Ron Johnson (WI-R) held the “Second Opinion” panel with top experts in the medical field. During that hearing, he presented a chart comparing adverse events of different medical products, like ivermectin, remdesivir, and the COVID-19 vaccines. After doing so, Johnson’s chart was whitewashed from the internet, YouTube, Facebook, Twitter (1.0), TikTok, and other major social media platforms. On Nov. 13, nearly two years after his initial chart went viral, Johnson presented the chart with updated figures at the “Injuries Caused by COVID-19 Vaccines” hearing. The data is alarming. Click here.

The Hospital Death Trap. On a recent installment of Joe Rogan’s podcast, Elon Musk explained how he knew, in the very early days of COVID Mania, why ventilators didn’t save lives, but increased deaths. Click here. (Reminder: I wrote about this almost a year ago!)

Continue Reading


"Were it not for hypocrisy I’d have no advice to give."
"Were it not for sciolism I’d have no ideas to share."
"Were it not for arrogance, I’d have no ambition."
"Were it not for forgetfulness, I would have no new ideas to write about."