This essay and others are available for syndication.
Contact Us for more information.

What’s Going On with Me, You Ask? I’ll Tell You… I’m Fat! 

RJ, an old friend who recently reconnected with me, asked me to bring him up to date on my life. “What are you spending your time on?” he asked. “Are you still working or retired? How’s the body? And the mind? Give me the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.”

After telling him how glad I was to be in contact with him again, I answered thusly:

“What’s going on with me? Let me start with the most important thing, RJ: I’m fat. Now, I’m not one of those people that say they are fat when their eight-pack turns into a six-pack. I have 15 to 20 pounds of blubber hanging on my bones, slowing me down, and increasing my blood pressure.

“So that’s number one.

“Second, third, and fourth, I’m dealing with a bunch of personal and business challenges that I doubt you’d be interested in.

“Fifth, for the first time in my life, I’m beginning to worry seriously about the direction of the world and what life is going to be like for my children and grandchildren.

“And finally, I’m fat. Oh, right… I already mentioned that.”

Then I thought… “Maybe I should write about this in my blog. I’ve written about my struggles with weight in the past, but maybe I should write about the new routine I’ve started that I’m excited about.”

I thought that was a pretty good idea. So that’s why you’re going to see it here now.

My new routine allows me to eat whatever and as much as I want – every day – and yet lose weight. So far, I’m averaging a pound a day. Which means that, if this continues, I’ll be back to fighting shape by the end of this month.

But before I tell you what it is, I’d like to share with you how, over the years, I have coped with those periods when I’ve draped a bath towel over the full-length mirror directly across from my shower and, if I ever found myself at the beach, had my beach towel tucked just beneath my chest so that onlookers could guess, but never know, how big my belly had grown.

My Psychological Approach: Switch-Hitting My Values

Whenever I’ve gone through one of those times, I’ve forced myself to think positively. I reminded myself that my physical appearance doesn’t matter. That what really matters is my family, my work, and whatever good I can do for other people. I told that to myself not just every morning, but every time I caught myself in profile passing a shop window.

And, of course, all of that is true.

So my vanity-based anxiety would recede. And I would begin to experience the true joy of being at peace with myself.

And when I lost the fat (which I always managed to do after wallowing in it for a year or so), I basked in my recovered body image with great jubilation, taking every chance to take off my shirt in front of strangers.

But that’s beside the point.

Here’s my new diet…

My Crazy New Eating Strategy

This diet is based on one that worked very well for me about 30 years ago. I combined it with the new information out there about the advantages of fasting, plus something I heard about a 50-year-old martial artist friend of mine who has always looked lean and muscular.

It’s simple. I eat only one meal a day. And I limit that meal to exactly 60 minutes.

I know how crazy this might sound. I know it contradicts the many other diets that advise eating lots of small meals throughout the day. It contradicts paleo diets, because I allow myself to eat all the carbs and artificial foods I care to. It even sort of contradicts the new fasting diets, which are based on having three meals a day but within restricted time limits.

I don’t know for sure the biological explanation for why it’s working. But I do know that eating once a day significantly limits the number of times per day my body will experience the ups and downs of insulin spikes that have always made me hungry a few hours after every meal (however healthy) and, when one of my meals was high in carbs, set off my metabolism so that it wanted to burn energy for fat, which meant my body would store more fat, even if the portions I was eating were small.

Actually, I think the main reason this diet is working for me is that it gives me another way to tap into the power of positive thinking. On this new diet, I no longer feel deprived. I no longer think about what I can’t eat. I don’t even have to think about how much I’m eating. I spend all my food-thinking energy imagining how I’m going to stuff my face during that one-hour period. How great it’s going to be to begin the meal with a cocktail, eat all the steak and mashed potatoes and gravy I can fit into my craw while drinking copious amounts of wine, end the meal with a pint of ice cream, and then, if there’s another five or ten minutes left, end the evening with a quick Cognac and a long-lasting cigar.

Not only is this diet working (so far), but since I started it, I have never felt a moment’s hunger. I’ve never wanted to grab a cookie when passing the cookie jar, and I’ve never gotten out of bed at 11:00 p.m. to raid the refrigerator.

I do drink a cup or two more coffee in the a.m. than I have in the past, and a glass or two of caffeinated diet cola in the afternoon. But I’m never pining for food. It’s 4:00 p.m. as I write this. We are having dinner at 6:00. I’m starting to think happily about what I’m going to eat, but I’m not pining.

I’ll keep you posted on my progress…

Continue Reading

Someone Among the COVID Skeptics Deserves the Nobel Peace Prize This Year: 3 Reasons

I promised to publish my “controversial” essays as Special Issues. And I am working on several of them right now. But last week, I found this little list somewhere (maybe on The Vigilant Fox website), and I felt compelled to reproduce it here. (Note to self: Keep record of all sources!) Knowing my longstanding views on COVID, the lockdowns, and the vaccines, it won’t surprise you to know that I agree with the points made below. 

Why someone involved in battling against the worldwide governmental response to the COVID insanity should receive the Nobel Peace Prize:

1. Stood up against the most egregious assault on human rights and civil liberties in modern history.

This included violations of bodily integrity and informed consent, the spread of a surveillance state, the closure of small businesses, and the dehumanization of people who wanted to be left alone.

2. Displayed great courage and made significant sacrifices to stand up for essential human values.

Previous Peace Prize recipients “typically paid a heavy personal price for their defense of human, women’s, and children’s rights.” COVID dissidents lost jobs, doctors who did not conform had their licenses threatened or taken away, and many lost lifetime relations with loved ones for not going along with the narrative.

3. Created supportive communities, took matters into their own hands, and overcame censorship in the face of tyranny.

* COVID-19 necessitated the emergence of citizen journalism, where regular people with full-time jobs dedicated their free time to covering the other side of the story, a.k.a. the truth.

* Others created and bolstered spaces for dissenters to coalesce. Platforms like Rumble and Telegram allowed citizen journalists to grow a following. And later on, Twitter unbanned accounts from the COVID resistance.

* And then there are the people who took to the streets, who deserve all the praise in the world. In [our] opinion, the Freedom Convoy will go down as one of the most important demonstrations in history. The efforts of the truckers and their allies almost single-handedly swung public favor against despotic vax mandates.

As such, “There should be no shortage of potential candidates for the Peace Prize to recognize their brave efforts to keep the flame of freedom flying through these dark times.”

Continue Reading

Entropy: The Hidden Force that Complicates Life

“Entropy applies to every part of our lives. It is inescapable, and even if we try to ignore it, the result is a collapse of some sort. Understanding entropy leads to a radical change in the way we see the world. Ignorance of it is responsible for many of our biggest mistakes and failures. We cannot expect anything to stay the way we leave it. To maintain our health, relationships, careers, skills, knowledge, societies, and possessions requires never-ending effort and vigilance. Disorder is not a mistake; it is our default. Order is always artificial and temporary.”

Source: the BrainFood website

Continue Reading

Chart of the Week: From Your First $100,000 to $1 Million

Einstein once called compound interest the Eighth Wonder of the World. And when it comes to wealth building, it deserves that title, because its ability to grow your net worth over time usually amazes people the first time they come to understand it. In my book Automatic Wealth, I devoted more than a chapter to its power, including a number of examples that did a good job of demonstrating its potential. 

This week, Sean has found other graphic ways of demonstrating an aspect of this power that, although I understood it intuitively, I’d never thought about articulating in that book or others. If you are not a huge fan of compound interest, this will make you one. – MF 

Did you know that $100,000 is actually 25% of $1,000,000?

It’s true.

The reason this feels illogical is because most people think linearly. 1 becomes 2 becomes 3 becomes 4.

But with compounding, the logic is exponential in nature. 1 becomes 2 becomes 4 becomes 8.

And once we start thinking exponentially, we see just how powerful of a tool this concept is for building wealth.

The blog “Four Pillar Freedom” has an excellent example of how compounding works.

If you invest $10,000 every year and earn a 7% annual interest rate, your portfolio will grow to $100,000 in 7.84 years:

And if you continue to do this, you’ll get the next $100,000 in 5.1 years.

Do you see where this is going?

With the power of compounding, the amount of money you have invested over a long enough time determines how fast your money can grow.

But what few people realize is that it also shrinks the amount of time you need to generate the same amount of money.

By investing $10,000 per year at 7% interest, it would take 22 years to get to $500,000.

But to go from $500,000 to $1 million? It only takes 8.5 years.

All in all, if you can save $10,000 per month and generate 7% returns…

Which, by the way, you can beat pretty easily if you invest in a basket of large cap stocks that have a history of growth and rewarding shareholders over time…

It will take you a little less than 31 years to earn that first $1 million.

It took you 7.84 years to get your first $100,000. That’s a little more than 25% of 31 years.

You get that first $100,000? You’re already a quarter of the way there.

But as the late Charlie Munger said, “That first $100,000 is a b*tch.”

– Sean MacIntyre

Click here to watch Sean’s recent video about the most valuable mental trick he learned from Charlie Munger about building wealth. 

Continue Reading

Speaking of Fasting… 

Did you hear that several incredibly brave pro-Palestinian Harvard students went on a hunger strike to support some pro-Palestinian Brown students who went on a hunger strike the day before? The Brown students lasted 16 hours. The Harvard students’ hunger strike lasted 8 hours (the amount of time that 95% of the world goes without food every day of the year). Click here.

With my new one-hour, once-a-day eating plan (see my Journal article, above), I’m hunger-striking for 23 hours! I’ll have to decide which cause to devote that time to.

Another Fun List of Actual Bird Names

A few months ago, for your amusement, I provided this link to a list of real bird names that some people might consider to be offensive – e.g., the Blue-Footed Booby.

Here are 12 more from Merriam-Webster’s WordPlay: “Bird Names that Sound Like Insults (and Sometimes Are).”

Pictured below: the Twit-Twat

Continue Reading

Andrew Tate’s New “Fireblood” Commercial

Andrew Tate 

Andrew Tate is loathed by lefties, because he has a very old-fashioned view of the proper roles for men and women in the world today.

The mainstream press has been hard on him, even circulating a false story that he had a brothel going in Romania. I see him as a very successful, but also brash, tough-guy influencer whose ideas are closer to Jordan Peterson’s than Attila the Hun’s. If you check him out on YouTube, debating TV hosts and the like, you’ll see what I mean.

I found out about him from BG, the 16-year-old son of TG, an old friend. Within six months last year, BG transformed himself from an overweight game-binging sloth to a lean, mean learning machine. He devotes himself to training and studying, and he’s grown more respectful and courteous, to boot. I attribute this to the macho teachings of Andrew Tate.

That one transition was so remarkable, and so improbable, that I became a Tate fan. But there has always been one thing that bothered me about him: His style of debate, although reasoned and rational, is very aggressive. When he’s in a heated debate, knowing he was a champion kickboxer, I find myself worrying that, at any moment, he’s going charge his opponents and pummel them into submission.

I want to say to him: “Relax. You are smart. You don’t have to be so dominant. Take yourself a little less seriously. Make a self-effacing joke once in a while.”

I never had the opportunity to coach him, but he seems to have gotten the idea with this pseudo commercial about a supplement he is supposedly selling called Fireblood. I thought it was funny. Tell me what you think.

Click here.

Continue Reading

Alex Berenson on Why the First Amendment Matters 

Alex Berenson 

Alex Berenson is not a right-wing radical. He’s not even a card-carrying conservative. He’s a thoughtful and well-educated researcher and writer who has developed a following by challenging large ideas, doctrines, and ideologies by pointing out verifiable facts and using logical reasoning. Here, he summarizes a speech he recently gave on why the rising rejection of the First Amendment is the greatest threat to our democracy and any democracy in the world.

Continue Reading

Playing Nirvana Blind…

Julliard jazz professor Ulysses Owens Jr. plays drums to Nirvana’s “In Bloom,” a song he’d never heard before, and comes amazingly close to Dave Grohl’s original track. Click here.

Continue Reading

More Than Mere Words Can Tell 

This week’s image comes from a high-school buddy of mine and a regular reader. He sent it to me a few days ago, saying, “Mark, in the interest of your self-improvement book writing, this idea may bear consideration.”

Maybe it was the mood I was in – a little sad about some changes in one of my businesses, and a little anxious about falling behind on my book-writing schedule. But somehow, this cartoon hit me as hilarious. Exactly the kind of hilarious that I needed that day. Let’s hope it has the same effect on some of those of you reading this today!

Continue Reading

From RY: “What are you hearing from Nicaragua?”

“I’m hearing some bad news about what’s happening in Nicaragua. At one time, I was even considering being an expat there with my wife. Are you hearing anything of value from the people you work with there?”

My Response: There has been a lot of political and social turmoil in Nicaragua in the last several years, including protests and government reprisals that got some publicity in the US before they were quashed by the government. But when I’m there (as I am right now in my second home on the Pacific coast of the country), I don’t feel in any way endangered. In fact, I feel safer and often happier than I do in the States.

Ortega’s government is in theory a democracy, but there is no denying that he wants to rule the country for a good while longer. So, he treats elections pretty much like the Democrats are doing in the US today – by putting (or trying to put) his major political opponents in jail.

His administration has recently done a few things – like taking over foreign gas stations and replacing them with ones that presumably he or his friends have an interest in – that are concerning. But he did that quasi-legally, by raising taxes and regulations. Again, the way the US does when it exerts eminent domain laws: carefully, quietly, and legally.

Since he was elected in 2007, he hasn’t done what he did when he was a revolutionary conqueror, seizing property and redistributing wealth and thus turning the country from one of the richest in Central America to one of the poorest.

The local population is divided between those that support him and those that don’t. But those that don’t generally keep their opinions to themselves. And I believe that’s largely because Ortega is no longer a Communist ideologue testing out a failed theory. He’s a pragmatist hoping to make Nicaragua a wealthier and more successful country, while taking care of himself and those loyal to him.

As a foreigner in Nicaragua, I don’t have the feeling I have as a US citizen in the US. In Nicaragua, I feel like things are getting better despite the sometimes questionable actions Ortega and his administration take.

Nicaragua, under his one-man control, is still beautiful, largely peaceful, and welcoming to foreigners who are there to help build the country, rather than work to undermine his plans and his authority in any significant way. Our resort community here is thriving, as is the non-profit community center my family has established across the road.

If you are interested in Nicaragua as a possible retirement destination or second home, or even as a regular place to visit, come down here for a week or two and decide for yourself.

Click here to see what it’s really like.

From JM re Tucker Carlson: 

“I have not looked at Tucker Carlson in years. I find him to be too snarky, and his ridiculous giggle… ugh! But in this interview with Xi Van Fleet, she relates an interesting story.”

My Response: I had the strongest negative reaction to Carlson when I began to watch him many years ago – for the same reasons you state. He comes across as a smart-ass frat boy, with a handful of cheap debate tactics that allowed him to spar effectively with his intellectual superiors.

My instinct was to dismiss him as such. But what kept me coming back was that he was so often touching directly on news events, social movements, and political topics that were culturally off limits. They were more than politically incorrect. They were unthinkable.

And yet, many of them were questions and speculations that were floating through my head.

And so I started listening to his show, or clips of his show, more regularly. Some of them – for example, the ones where he interviews some totally nutty Woke person – are, admittedly, B-level entertainment. But as time went by, I noticed that he was asking questions and hinting at allegations that the rest of the conservative media wasn’t willing to touch.

And several times – such as when he immediately challenged the US position on backing Ukraine – I was astonished by his bravery. Who else at his level of celebrity was saying what he was saying, which to me was the obvious truth… that Russia was responding to yet another attempt by the US to ignite another fire in our Cold War with them, which has never ended? And, of course, almost everyone hectored him for interviewing Putin. Even those that have no idea why NATO was created, what it is, and what it does. I could give you other examples… but I can’t think of another newsperson at his level that has the balls he has. There is a reason he got kicked off Fox. And that reason is what explains why the conservative movement in the US has been so self-destructive for so many years.

That said (as they say)…

I still cringe when he employs his cheapest debate tactics. And I suffer endlessly when watching his never-ceasing and never-ending facial gestures – those weird, almost perverse, child-like faces. And, as you say, his cackling, demented laugh. But it’s a price I’m willing to pay to be able to see someone – someone with a large commercial platform – ask the questions and make the suggestions that nobody else is willing even to talk about.

Here’s one more thought: The immediate impression I had of Carlson allowed me to put him in a mental box I reserved for right-wing whackos who seemed to be willing to say anything to get ratings, and who then did say many, many things that were proven to be obviously and patently false. But he doesn’t do that. If you listen to him, you will notice that he is very careful to use the right nouns and adjectives when he is pushing up against a major, politically sensitive issue.

Continue Reading

Is Beyoncé a Real Country Singer? 

On Feb. 12, in the middle of the Super Bowl, Beyoncé debuted two songs. One of them, “Texas Hold ’Em,” went to number one on the Billboard country chart, making her the first Black woman ever to capture that spot. (Her other new release, “16 Carriages,” debuted at number nine.)

I liked “Texas Hold ‘Em.” The music felt pleasingly country to me. Her unique voice added something je ne sais quoi to it, and I liked how the lyrics seemed to be a hybrid of hip-hop and country diction.

But the question that pop-music pundits are asking is… can Beyoncé do anything that is authentically country? Check this out. What do you think?

Continue Reading


"Were it not for hypocrisy I’d have no advice to give."
"Were it not for sciolism I’d have no ideas to share."
"Were it not for arrogance, I’d have no ambition."
"Were it not for forgetfulness, I would have no new ideas to write about."