What Are My Thoughts? 

JS, my editor, thought I should write something about the election results. So, I’ve been thinking about what I think and, so far, I don’t have any thoughts worth writing about. But I do have a feeling about the results. On both a state and a federal level, I feel a bit safer about the future than I felt a week ago. With more of a balance in the House (and maybe the Senate), there should be a slightly better chance that Congress will do an overall better job by passing fewer laws and spending less money and generally reducing their power and presence. Okay. Maybe that’s optimistic. Still, as Hem said, isn’t it pretty to think so?

What I Believe: About Gun Control

I think everyone should have the right to own a gun. Or guns. But I also believe in gun control. I can’t, for the life of me, understand the arguments against, at the very least, banning assault weapons.

The best argument in favor of assault weapons is a political and theoretical one. It’s based on the second amendment, which states that “the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” But the primary rationale for the second amendment was not for protection against robbery or personal assault. It was for protection against tyranny. Our founding fathers had risked their lives defending America from tyranny, in large part with state militias. They recognized that the government they were establishing could one day devolve into tyranny. To prevent that, they wanted citizens to be armed.

So, if that was the intention, and we want to hold fast to the intention, it’s difficult to argue with the right for all Americans not just to be armed, but to be armed to the hilt so they could militia-up and fight governmental tyranny.

But as a pragmatist, I can’t see that playing out in the real world.

Tyranny is a real threat. And we should be on guard against it. I just don’t think the answer is a deluge of automatic weapons.

That’s where my thinking is now. And I would be wasting your reading time if that was all I had to say on the subject. But, in researching assault weapons, I discovered something interesting. It’s something you may not know.

I assumed that assault weapons were responsible for most of the homicides in America. It turns out, that’s not true.

According to FBI data, handguns are the weapons of choice for most killers in this country. In every one of the past 20 years, the overwhelming majority of murders involved handguns. And an NIH study confirmed that, depending on the year, assault rifles accounted for between 2% and 12% of all homicides.

In the chart below, you can see that, in this particular year, automatic handguns and rifles were used in 329 murders, or about 2% of the total.

Conclusion: This is not to say that assault weapons are not a problem. When it comes to mass shootings, they are, indeed, the weapon of choice. Assault weapons are involved in more than 80% of mass killings, according to FBI data. (Interesting: The greatest mass killer in American history must certainly be Charles Cullen – i.e., The Good Nurse. And he didn’t use a weapon of any kind.) Given my thoughts on applying the death penalty to serial killers and mass murderers (see what I said about capital punishment in Tuesday’s issue), logic compels me to favor significant restrictions, including serious psychological screening, for owning assault weapons.

It’s Not a Passion, but It’s Close 

 I’m in Costa Rica for a few days, working on one of what I call my “legacy” projects – non-profit entities that will continue to exist long after I’m gone.

In this case, it’s a foundation that aims to raise the status of Central American modern and contemporary art. We are making friends and writing books and curating a collection and building a museum.

It’s an ambitious project. Like so many things I’ve done in my life, had I any idea how much work and money it would require, I probably would not have started it. But I’m not complaining. This is something I love.

I’m here, along with three board members, to make a formal presentation of our book – Central American Modernism – at the Museo de Arte Costarricense (Costa Rican Museum of Art), and to meet with some of the country’s top artists, dealers, and collectors, In addition to celebrating the book, which took nearly ten years to complete, we will be gathering information and taking photos for our next book.

I don’t like the way the word “passion” is used nowadays. It is used as a substitute for less emotive words like “commitment” or “enjoyment.” So, I avoid saying that I am “passionate” about what I do – even when I enjoy it and feel a strong commitment to it. But in the case of this legacy project, the level of my enjoyment is greater than usual. It surprises me. And there are times when it really does feel almost passionate. Like yesterday, when we spent the afternoon with Edgar Zúñiga (the younger half-brother to the well-known Francisco), an amazing sculptor who gave us a personal tour of his foundry, and then had dinner with Claus Steinmetz, one of the most important and most knowledgeable dealers of Central American art.

My Favorite Weddings

Getting married is a seriously happy and happily serious social ritual.

The serious stuff is expressed in the observations and advice of the officiant, as well as the promises made by the bride and groom. The happy stuff is expressed at the reception afterwards, in speeches and song and dance.

I’m not sure why it is, but I’ve been to a lot of ethnic American weddings. Irish American weddings. Italian American weddings. Jewish American weddings, Lebanese American weddings. Polish American weddings. The list goes on.

I’ve also been to weddings in France and England and Italy and Spain. And I’ve been an interested onlooker at weddings in China, India, Thailand, and Japan. My favorites are those that tilt the happiness/serious ratio towards happiness.

One of my all-time favorite weddings was a two-day event that took place in Chad, Africa, in 1976. (I was there as a Peace Corps volunteer, teaching English literature at the University of Chad.) It was the wedding of Arosi, a Chadian friend of mine. He was from northern Chad, and a member of a tribe whose culture was a medley of Arab and animist beliefs.

On day one, we, Arosi’s best men, ritually invaded the home of the bride and, in front of her family and friends, we… well, we kidnapped her! We carried her out of the house, put her in the back seat of the pickup truck we had come in, and took her to Arosi’s house. Minutes after we got there, a troop of her friends broke into his house, rescued the bride, and returned her to her house. We went to a bar.

The marriage ceremony took place the following afternoon. I arrived a few minutes late. The guests were already gathered, drinking and chatting, just like what you would expect at an American wedding. Arosi was there. But not his bride. I wondered why.

I didn’t have to wonder long. All of a sudden, there was a drumming, and the crowd hushed. The bride, dressed in a floor-length white gown, with a white veil covering her head, was led into the room by her bridesmaids.

For a long moment, the place was silent. The bride stood there, her head tilted backwards, her body statue-still. The musicians began to play a languid, Middle Eastern sounding tune, and then everyone was shouting at Arosi. It was half in Arabic and half in his native tongue. I didn’t understand a word, but I intuited the intention. They were playfully urging him to do something.

Arosi stood there, smiling and shaking his head. The more he shook his head, the louder they shouted. Finally, he gave in, approached his bride, and stood in front of her. He lifted the veil from her head. And the music stopped.

It took my breath away. There she was, this stunningly beautiful, ebony-skinned woman in a white gown, adorned from head to toe with gold jewelry.

The music began again, and the bride began to dance. Slowly and then with more energy. She was moving almost erotically to the music. No, not “almost.” It was very erotic. And powerful. A visual battle between an idealization of feminine beauty and the power of feminine sexuality.

I’d never seen anything like it. I was half shocked and half embarrassed.

Arosi put the veil back on her head. She stopped dancing and resumed her frozen pose. The music stopped, too.

It was very dramatic. And I was disappointed.  I felt like something I very much needed had suddenly been taken away from me. Like watching a great boxing match and having the lights go out at a pivotal moment.

Once again, the crowd shouted encouragement to Arosi. And, once again, he shook his head, smiling. Finally, he relented and lifted the veil. And, again, his beautiful wife began to move, gradually resuming her seductive dance.

This ritual was repeated perhaps a half-dozen times. Then the crowd joined the dance, and the party began.

I went to several other African weddings during the two years I lived in Chad, and I’ve been to one here in the States. And they all had elements of what made Arosi’s so special, and the most memorable wedding I’ve ever been to: the celebration of feminine beauty and power, expressed though this interesting combination of Black African and Arabic music and dancing.

Oh, wait! I can’t believe I just said that this was the most memorable wedding I’ve ever been to. There was one – and it was in Africa, too – that was more memorable. It was my own wedding to K – about a week after she came to join me in Chad. Click here to read that story.

Three Social-Justice Trends Boosting Crime in Major Cities

In big cities across the USA, crime is soaring. Robberies are up. Assaults are up. Carjackings are up. And murders are up.

There are, no doubt, several reasons for this. Here are three:

* Cashless Bail: A solution to a political problem – the problem being that poor people, and in particular people of color, spend time in jail because they can’t afford to pay their bail. To achieve equity, those people are released after booking, without bail, so they don’t have to spend time in jail.

* Reclassification of Crimes: In some cities, many crimes that were previously classified as felonies have been downgraded to misdemeanors. These include various kinds of theft and assault, carjacking, and resisting arrest.

* Woke DAs: In many of these same cities, DAs are being appointed who believe their job is to work towards social justice by declining to prosecute crimes that they deem not to be prosecution worthy.

What has happened in these cities, some speculate, is that the word is out. You can commit all sorts of crimes without worrying about going to jail.

There may be more to this rise in crime, but these three trends are a big part of it. What’s especially vexing is knowing that a very large percentage of the crimes are being committed by repeat offenders.

An example from New York: Frank Abrokwa. On Feb. 21, he was arrested for smearing his feces into a woman’s face as she sat in a subway station. Local newspapers covered it. He was arrested, processed, and released within hours.

The very next day, he was arrested for shoplifting at a hardware store and threatening employees with a screwdriver. Released without bail.

A month earlier, on Feb. 5, he had been arrested for punching a 53-year-old man at the Port Authority Bus Terminal. Again, he was released without bail.

A month before that, on Jan. 7, he had been arrested for hitting a stranger on a subway platform. He was released without bail.

Those are just four catch-and-release episodes concerning one man. But Abrokwa’s record is much more impressive than that. He’s been arrested 45 times.

Read the story here.

And watch the video here.

Five Reasons Old People (and Everyone Else) Should Work Out Harder

My surgeon gave me the go-ahead on Tuesday to resume full-fledged exercising. That means lifting heavy, hard sprinting, and submission wrestling. I’m eager to get back into it. And for good reasons.

Most people my age have abandoned vigorous exercise – i.e., sprinting, and heavy strength training – in favor of less strenuous activities such as yoga, Pilates, and walking. I get it. I feel like I’ve done my life’s quota of heavy squats and 50-yard dashes. And isn’t it dangerous to exercise too hard? Isn’t that how oldsters get strokes and heart attacks?

The short answer is no. There are certainly circumstances and situations when hard exercise is dangerous. But they are exceptions. Not the rule. The literature I’ve read on exercising for old people – and I’ve been reading it for at least 20 years – has shown that exercising is good and that exercising hard is even better.

Three reasons:

* Sprinting and other demanding cardiovascular exercise improves blood flow, reduces blood pressure, and improves heart health.

* Strong legs reduce the likelihood of falling. And falling, for old and frail people, is the number one way to die.

* Vigorous exercise has also been shown to improve mood. (Almost invariably, my best mood every day is after I’ve spent an hour wrestling.)

But that’s not all. Recently, I read a study that gave me an even better reason to work hard on strength training. It found that strength training, more than any other type of exercise, has the most impact on longevity. People that keep a fair amount of muscle on their bodies live years longer than those that don’t.

And if those four reasons aren’t enough, here’s a surprising fifth: Exercising hard is an antidote to cognitive decline. Mild exercise doesn’t do it. Pushing yourself in the gym will.

Check out this link to read Peter Attia’s summary of all this research.

Feeling Low…

 

I’ve been feeling low. My numbers (on my mood scale) have dropped from the 7.5 to 8.5 range to 6.5 to 7.5. That’s the difference between “Ready-to-go!” and “Why-should-I-bother?”

Because I track my moods so closely, I am not worried about this lingering malaise. I know from experience that I will get past it eventually. And in the short term, I can boost myself from 6.5 to 7.0 in a single day by doing the same things that have worked in the past.

Although I believe that severe depression is almost never “caused” by an individual event, moderate drops in mood can be. In my case, there is some residual psychological detritus from feeling close to death. And then, while I was pulling myself up from that, I had to deal with the news that two friends of mine had died.

 Margie ran our English language program at FunLimón, the community center that my family established in Nicaragua, across the street from Rancho Santana. She was in her late 80s when, about two months ago, she had a stroke, from which she eventually died.

 Margie was an astonishingly vibrant and accomplished woman. She was a mother and a nurse and a teacher, but she was also an adventurer, a pioneer, and a ball-busting business partner. (I did a deal with her once. That was enough!) She was also a wonderfully giving person, who spent her last 15 years living in Nicaragua – teaching, befriending, helping, and caring for the locals. At her funeral, half the town showed up.

 Two years ago, I had the idea to make a small-scale documentary film about the lives of some of our eldest residents of Rancho Santana. We spent a year interviewing and filming them. Margie was one. (When the movie is finished, I’ll give you a link to it.)

 And then, just yesterday, I received word that my good friend Joselito had died.

 Joselito was another amazingly accomplished and astonishingly loving and giving person. He passed from esophageal cancer, which he’d been battling for about a year.

 I’d known Joselito for about 25 years. He was one of the first Nicaraguans I met outside of my Nicaraguan partners. He was a singer and guitar player whose repertoire of Spanish love songs was endless. For 25 years, he would travel every weekend for four or five hours to get from his home to the Ranch. And he would spend two or three days playing and singing for our guests, performing at small functions, and selling off-brand cigars on the side.

 Joselito had a beautiful voice and a unique way of playing the guitar (as I’ve been told by guitar players). He wrote songs for and about people, including one about me, one about Rancho Santana, and two love songs for Number Three Son’s girlfriends, the second of whom became his wife. About 10 years ago, I arranged for Joselito to travel to New York City with me, so that Number Two Son could produce an album of some of his best songs and covers. Number Two Son had arranged for some of the finest Latin musicians to accompany Joselito, including Tito Puente’s drummer. The record came out very well. (I have copies for sale if you want one.) But that weekend, itself, watching Joselito charm everyone around him in the Big Apple, was an experience I will never forget.

The Father-Son Talk 

I was twelve years old. My father and I were on the train, traveling from our home on Long Island to the city, where he was teaching a course in speed reading that I was taking. It was about eight a.m. Which meant the train was full of people, almost exclusively men in suits. What motivated him to do it then and there I will never understand, but it was on that train ride on that morning that my father, the professor, decided to give his eldest boy the father-son talk.

I only heard the first sentence. It was articulated clearly in his pansophic voice. “Mark. Are you aware that there are actually two biological functions for your penis?”

Every other thought or conversation happening in that train car at that moment came to a screeching halt. I was acutely aware that everyone within earshot was focused on us. For them, I’m sure, my father’s lecture was going to be touching and amusing. For me, it was an absolute adolescent nightmare.

I have no recollection of what happened after that. I could not even tell you whether my father continued his biological treatise. I know only that I would have given anything, even my life, if I could have disappeared.

When my boys reached that age, I was reluctant to put them through the same sort of trauma. So, when K told me it was time for the father-son talk, I balked. “I don’t think they want to have that conversation,” I said. “And anyway, they probably know everything already.”

K disagreed. This was a parental duty, she explained. One of the few that I could do better than she. I was always a sucker for that kind of puffery. So, I agreed. But when it came time for the talk, I eschewed my father’s formal approach. I kept the talks short and sweet.

They went something like this:

Me: I think we should have a talk.

Son: What? Is this going to be the talk about sex?

Me: Well, sort of.

Son: Forget it, Dad. I probably know more than you do.

Me: Yes, you probably do.

Son (smiling): Did Mom put you up to this?

Me (frowning): That’s not the point.

Son (laughing): It’s okay, Dad. Consider the conversation complete. You can assure her that I know what I need to know. You did your job. We had the conversation.

Me: I did? We did?

Son (still laughing): Yes, we did.

Me (clearing my throat): Okay, then. Great! Well, I’m glad we were able to discuss it.

That was then. This is now. In six or seven years, my eldest grandson will be old enough to have the father-son talk with his dad, our second son. But the world is a very different place today. Back then, it was relatively simple. And naïve.

So, when Number Two Son has that conversation, I can only wonder how it will go. Hopefully, not like this…

Old Friends

 I’ve been in Myrtle Beach since Tuesday evening, a few days late to a yearly get together with some old friends. Golfing is the game that gives the week its official purpose. And when this annual reunion began, more than 20 years ago, most of us were golfing earnestly, sometimes twice a day. But over the years, the spirit of competition and even the enthusiasm for the game itself has waned, along with any hopes any of us ever had of becoming truly good golfers.

What’s left is what we had to begin with. An easy sort of friendship that began for some of us in high school and has continued, against all odds, throughout the years. At times, when I consider what different careers we’ve had, and how dispersed we are geographically, it seems miraculous that we are still connected.

But perhaps that’s the point, the link that ties us still together. Friendship, like marriage, endures only if it’s flexible and forgiving. If we want too much from it, we will likely be disappointed. But if we want too little from it, so little that we don’t at least give it the attention it needs, it will disappear.

What I expect from my friends in terms of companionship is what I expect from them in terms of their golf games. They will play with the same energy, enthusiasm, and good will as they have always played – just as I will… and that will be enough.

Why You Should Have a Piano

When I was growing up, a big house with a Cadillac in the driveway was the ultimate status symbol. Inside the house, it was a living room that no one ever sat in, with a grand piano in the corner.

We Fords lived in a small, dilapidated house with a rusted station wagon in the driveway. The only status symbols we had were books – handsome hardbound books piled everywhere, including a stack that served as a leg of the dining room table.

We never had a piano. But I wanted one. Not so much to play as to have. I needed the sort of validation it offered. And so, I was determined to get one… one day.

That day arrived in the mid 1980s. I’d become a junior partner in the publishing company I worked for, and K and I had just moved into the house of our dreams. A house with a nice-sized living room that could accommodate a medium-sized grand piano. (And that same piano sits in our “music room” today.)

But having a piano wasn’t enough in my mind. I wanted it to be played. Not by K or by me, necessarily, but by someone.

My siblings and I were required to play musical instruments when we were in grade school. One of the girls played the flute. Another, the clarinet. My brother Andrew played the trumpet, which I thought was cool, almost as cool as the drums. I was hoping to play the drums. But when it came time for Sister Christine to assign me an instrument, the only thing left was a French horn. Not cool. But still…

So, K and I continued this tradition by having our kids take piano lessons when they were young. Two of them gave up on their instruments as soon as they were allowed. One became good enough to be accepted into NYU’s music department and then get a job in LA as a composer and arranger of music. When he and his family are in town for a visit, it’s a pleasure to see him, late at night, creating music on that old piano.

The piano still plays remarkably well. But it has lost some of its prestige since I bought it 40 years ago. Pianos are no longer de rigueur symbols of financial success. On the contrary, it’s rare to see one in a million-dollar home. You’re much more likely to see a 100-inch TV.

At its peak, there were more than 100 piano manufacturers making hundreds of pianos every day in the United States. Today, there are only two: Steinway and Mason & Hamlin.

In a recent issue of The Hustle, Zachary Crockett had an essay titled “How one of America’s last piano manufacturers stays alive.” It’s a fascinating story. Much more about economic and cultural changes in America than you might think. Read it here.