My First “Paycheck” Job

PP and I were reminiscing about some of the jobs we had in high school. This somehow led to a discussion of “How come kids don’t work hard today?”

It got me thinking about my first job. Not the paper route I had when I was eight or the lawn mowing and attic cleaning I did for extra bucks. I was thinking about my first real job. My first timeclock-punching, paycheck-receiving, tax-withholding job.

It was 1962. I was 12 years old, in 6th grade at St. Agnes grammar school. I had a weekend job at the Rockville Center Car Wash. I worked eight hours on Saturday and Sunday, from 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., with a half-hour for lunch.

I worked in tandem with Brian, a classmate of mine. Our job was to wash and dry the interior windows of every car that went through the automatic carwash machine. At full speed, it spit out a car every 60 or 80 seconds. And on weekends, the place was so busy that they never stopped coming. “It’s a “hustle job,” Joe, the cigar-chomping manager had warned us when we applied for the job. And he was right. We had to jump in the car (I took the front; Brian took the back), spray fluid on the glass, and wipe it clean. In a typical day, we covered 240 cars.

You might wonder: Why did Joe hire 12-year-olds for such a demanding job? The reason was simple: We were small enough and fast enough to jump in and out of the cars all day long.

And what were we paid for hustling non-stop eight hours a day? Our wages were $1.25 an hour. That was $10 a day; $20 for the weekend. And we felt very lucky to have such a grown-up job.

Is This Crazy? Or Am I?

Language Police “Wokerize” Another Phrase!

In January, following the lead of the University of Southern California’s School of Social Work, Michigan’s Dept. of Health and Human Services banned the use of the phrase “field worker.”

A field worker is usually defined today as someone who works outside of the office and travels to different locations. It is less frequently but still used to define a farm laborer. And it’s being banned because of “concerns” that using words like “going into the field” or “doing field work” may have racist connotations.

(I’m not making that up!)

I wonder how that’s going to work?

Let’s see. In the future…

* Speakers will no longer “field” questions from an audience, but “harvest” them.

* Baseball will be played on “locations of grass with strips of dirt.”

* Architecture and biology will no longer be “fields” of study, but just plain “subjects of study.” No, wait. That’s not right! Due to the possibility that post-colonialized people may be offended by “subjects of study,” they will be “thingies you can study.”

Making a Stranger’s Day

Click here for a video clip about a passenger helping out an Uber driver in trouble. When I watched it, it reminded me of a similar experience I had several years ago.

Here’s my story…

I was getting a haircut in NYC. Through the plate-glass window of the barbershop, I could see a young Black guy pleading with a pair of cops. My barber followed my gaze.

“That’s the young man that cleans all the storefront windows in this area,” he said. “A nice kid. He works hard.”

“I’ll be right back,” I said.

I went outside to see what was going on. A small crowd had gathered, taking in the scene. “I think they’re impounding his car,” one of them told me.

“For what?” I asked.

He shrugged. “Sounds like he didn’t pay a bunch of tickets.”

The kid looked frantic. He was pacing back and forth. “I need my car for my work,” he said. “Please! I’m going to pay those tickets.”

“You got the money?” one of the cops asked.

“No. But I will get it,” he said. “Just don’t take the car.”

The cop began writing him up, and his partner walked back to the squad car. I went over to him and asked if they would let the kid go if I paid his tickets. He looked at me as if he thought I was crazy.

“I’m serious,” I said.

He looked through his paperwork. The total is X,” he said. X was a lot of money. More than I expected. But I happened to have almost exactly that in my pocket, because I had just come from the bank.

He pulled his partner aside, spoke to him for a few minutes, then came back to me.

“Are you sure you wanna do this?” he asked.

“I am,” I said.

He motioned for me to follow him, and we quietly made the transaction behind his car. I thought about asking for a receipt but decided against it. He walked back to his partner and whispered something to him. Then he said something to the kid, and the kid started screaming and jumping up and down. “I knew it!” he shouted. “There is a god! There is a god!”

He searched the faces in the crowd to see if he could figure out who to thank. But I was already halfway down the street. I don’t believe in a god, but that made my day.

Nicaragua? Yes, Nicaragua! 

On Tuesday, I told you about the results of a Gallup poll that listed Nicaragua as the “No. 1 country where people say they are ‘always’ or ‘almost always’ at peace.”

Nicaragua? Surprising? At first, yes. I was surprised. For the reasons I mentioned on Tuesday. But when I thought about the hundreds of Nicaraguan people I’ve lived with and worked with over the past 25+ years, I realized that I shouldn’t have been.

Nicaraguans are, by far, happier than Americans or Europeans or Middle Easterners or people in many of the Asian countries I know. The only people I’ve known that I’d say were happier than Nicaraguans were the Chadian people when I lived and worked there. And Chad, at that time, was one of the five poorest countries in the world.

You are no doubt familiar with the commonly quoted research on the correlation between wealth and happiness. It showed that once people have enough money to pay for their basic needs, the acquisition of more money does not directly affect their level of happiness. We usually understand “basic needs” to mean food and shelter, as well as plumbing, electricity, transportation, and so on. But that’s only true for wealthy countries. In poor countries, the basics truly are basic. A wooden shack and a well somewhere nearby is enough to make millions and millions of people happy with their lives.

And if this is true, why do we believe that (a) being poor is always and bad thing, and (b) helping poor people get richer is always a good thing?

What Is the Country Whose Citizens Are the Most Content?

A friend sent a report on a Gallup poll about the countries that have the happiest people. Well, that’s not precisely right. It wasn’t about happiness. It was about contentment.

Many such surveys are based on objective criteria like per capita income, life expectancy, health data, and more. I always ignored them, preferring to know the subjective responses – how people feel. That’s the way this one was designed. It employed questions like “Are you at peace with yourself (a) all of the time, (b) some of the time, (c) none of the time.”

Anyway… guess which country came out on top?

The USA? Canada? France? Switzerland? Sweden?

No!

Believe it or not, it was the country that hosts the Ford family’s second home: Nicaragua!

Is that crazy? Nicaragua is usually ranked as the poorest country in Latin America and one of the 50 poorest countries in the world. It is also a country that has survived a US-supported dictatorship, a communist revolution, a leftist dictatorship, a major earthquake, constant natural disasters, and more.

You can read about it here.

(On Friday, I’ll tell you why I think Nica came out on top.)

My Statin Story Continues…

In the Friday issue, I wrote about the chronic fatigue and bouts of brain fog I’ve been experiencing since I began taking statins. I met with Dr. B to talk about my concerns. He didn’t seem surprised. He wrote me a script for a different brand. “This one might work better,” he said.

“What if it doesn’t?” I asked.

“If it doesn’t, I can prescribe something else. It’s not a statin. You take it every two weeks by injection. It works as well as – or better than – statins, but with zero side effects.”

“So, why not just start me on that?”

“Well, it’s very expensive. Insurance won’t cover it until you’ve tried two statins. And statins do work about 50% of the time.”

“Why haven’t I ever heard of it?”

He shrugged. “Actually, I take it myself.”

“You what? You take it yourself!”

I looked at him like I wanted to say… well, you know what I wanted to say!

So, now I’m doing more research, including following up on all sorts of tips and suggestions I’ve been receiving from readers.

Of all the emails I received, the one from KI was the most immediately helpful. She said that she was “surprised” I hadn’t run into the work that had been done by Maryanne Demasi, a scientist/journalist that has been focused on statin drugs for several years.

Do yourself a favor. Watch any videos you can find that Demasi has done about statins. (Click here for one of them.) You will be impressed by her seriousness, her control of the facts, and her dispassionate way of collecting and presenting them.

One of the many things that Demasi did to advance the scientific inquiry was review the studies that compared the conditions and fatality rates of people that had been prescribed statin drugs (for abnormally high total cholesterol counts) with those that didn’t take them. What she discovered – and it was crystal clear from the evidence – was that statins did not increase lifespan. (Click here to read a recent article by Demasi on her analysis of the data.)

I’m going to keep reading everything I can find about statins. But from everything I’ve learned so far, I don’t believe that taking them will help me live longer. Nor do I believe it will do anything significant for improving my health. The only discernable benefit may be that it will dramatically bring down my overall cholesterol levels.

And since I also think – no, since I know for certain – that the fatigue I’ve been experiencing since I started on statins has reduced my productivity by 30% – from about 18 hours to 12 on weekdays and from about nine hours to six on weekends – I’m going to try out those injections Dr. B mentioned. And if they have the same negative effect on my energy and clarity of mind as the statin, I’m going “bare” starting next month.

I’ll keep you posted!

Why Am I Falling Behind?

Since my stroke in September, I’ve been losing ground on my to-do list. One example: I have three email inboxes. A red-flagged one that I try to answer within 24 hours. An orange-flagged one that I try to answer within seven days. And a yellow-flagged one that I try to answer within 30 days. I am grievously behind on all of them. My red inbox now holds 80 to 90 items, instead of the 15 to 20 I was always able to manage. My orange inbox, which used to hold 60 to 70 items, now has more than 10 times that number.

What the heck is going on?

I was worried that my brain was slowing down. That it was taking longer for me to complete tasks. But it didn’t feel like that was true. So I looked at my log and my journal, and realized that I’ve been sleeping or napping an extra three hours a day. That’s a better reason for my lack of productivity than a retarding brain, but it’s not comforting.

I asked my doctors about it, and they seemed to think that sleeping more could be a natural response to the “trauma” of the stroke and surgery. But that didn’t feel right either.

I told one of my trainers about it, and he asked me if I had been taking any new medications. “I don’t think so,” I said. But then I remembered. I was taking a statin. He looked up the research on statins and, sure enough, he found that one of the big side effects is chronic and/or acute fatigue.

Now that felt right to me. For the past decade or so, I’d resisted taking statins to reduce my overall cholesterol levels because I was aware that they produce a variety of unwelcome side effects. And because – although they are very good at lowering cholesterol numbers – they didn’t seem to extend lifespans for users. But after the stroke, I was more “open minded” about statins. My doctors wanted me to take them. And the side effects I knew about were not especially frightening.

But this fatigue thing… it may be a deal breaker. I’ve got too much to do. Too many miles to go. I’m not willing to give up three hours of work per day for the nebulous promise of reducing my chances of getting heart disease.

My plan is to ask my primary doctor about lowering my dosage or trying other statins to see if either of those tactics help. In the meantime, I’m going to do more research, which I’ll share with you.

Click here to read a report on the study that my trainer found.

And click here and here and here for some others.

A Fitness Program for 2023

Good for the Young as Well as the Older

Since my stroke three months ago, I’ve been trying to get back into my former physical shape. I want to reclaim my strength, speed, flexibility, and stamina – the things that make it possible to play Brazilian Jiu Jitsu. Enjoying my favorite sport is a good reason to get fit again. But a better reason, thanks to surviving the stroke, is the recognition that achieving certain levels of physical performance health should not only extend but also enhance the quality of my life.

I’ve been reading about and reporting on fitness and longevity regularly since early 2000. In that time, there has been an unending stream of studies on those topics with a variety of findings. (As you might expect.) But of everything I’ve read, including many meta-studies, there are two objectives that matter more than any of the others.

They are not, as one might expect, those things that one notices most about aging: the diminishing flexibility, stamina, and balance. Those are important. But the studies show that the thing that matters most is strength: muscular strength, skeletal strength, and the strength of the heart and lungs.

If you are younger than 50, my approach to exercise may be similar to the one you are doing now. I exercise all the muscle groups and my lungs pretty hard. People 50 and over are typically advised to (or feel comfortable with) exercise that is less intense. When it comes to training my heart, my approach would have been considered radical for anyone over 40 and downright dangerous for anyone in his 70s. And many doctors and fitness experts that are not familiar with all the recent studies (like the one below) would have that view today. So, find someone that you trust, who is also up to date on fitness studies, to advise you personally.

My exercise routine is based on the notion that to make your body stronger – and that includes not only your muscles but your skeleton, your heart, and your lungs – you have to stress it by pushing yourself harder than you probably want to. It means lifting more weight, sprinting faster, and generally pushing yourself towards exhaustion.

This is what I do:

Although I schedule six hour and a half workouts a week, I do fewer than that at least one week a month. Four of those sessions are doing Brazilian Jiu Jitsu. The way I train (hard for an hour of the 90 minutes), it exercises my entire body, inside and out, and leaves me exhausted. Two days a week I do a physical fitness training. This consists of about 40 to 50 minutes of heavy and intense weightlifting, 20 minutes of intense cardiovascular exercise (usually four 5-minute bike sprints), and 20 to 30 minutes of stretching.

My goal in weightlifting is to exhaust my muscles. That means lifting like a power lifter or an Olympic lifter (hard and fast), rather than a body builder (less weight and more control). And I try to get stronger, either in terms of maximum strength or stamina.

My goal in cardiovascular exercise is to do at least three bike sprints (on an Aerodyne bike) in 30 minutes. Given the condition of my knees these days, it’s tough. (Believe me!) I don’t do a single five-minute ride at a moderate pace. I sprint as hard as I can for 15 seconds, continue at a moderate rate for 10 seconds, and repeat. I monitor my heart while I bike. My goal is to get my heart to its maximum level, which in my condition these days is about 170 beats.

If I have a good workout:

* I will have achieved a heart rate of 170 beats at least once.

* I will feel physically exhausted – like I could not climb a flight of stairs.

* I will have sweated off at least 2% of my body weight – i.e., more than four pounds.

* I will feel very good.

Unless I have business or family requirements that make it impossible, I am pretty good about finding time to exercise six times a week. But I can’t say that I achieve the goal of exercising to exhaustion every time.

In fact, it’s not unusual – and lately, it’s quite common – for me to walk into my gym with a head full of reasons why my trainer should take it easy on me. I don’t beat myself up about this impulse to shirk the work. I accept it as a natural and inevitable product of getting older. But what has been working for me is that I’ve told my trainers to agree with whatever BS I tell them and get me moving slowly at first… and then gradually push me as hard as I’ll go for the rest of the time.

If you don’t have a trainer, that will be more difficult. But you can still do it. Just start off easy and increase the pace and intensity gradually. As your body warms up, you will find that you can do more than you might believe.

There are few things more annoying than talking to someone that can’t stop talking about how clever and cute their little child or grandchild is.

It’s understandable as a biological impulse – protection of the gene pool, and all that. But it’s not good manners. And face it, nobody wants to hear about it.

Unless…

… unless the child is truly extraordinary, exceptionally clever, and almost unbelievably adorable. Like my grandson, Hudson (above).

Comedy Censorship: The Penultimate Step Before Totalitarianism

Over the last 10 years or so, ideas about fairness and equality have changed drastically in Europe and America. Almost all of it germinated in colleges and universities. And most of it mind-bogglingly stupid. When I hear about it, I feel afraid for my grandchildren. What kind of Orwellian world will they have to live in?

I tell myself to calm down. Not to worry. These new ideas are so contrary to the actual experience of living in the real world, that they can’t possibly last much longer. But if they do last, what then?

For someone like me, someone who is not comfortable doing and thinking what I’m told, the thought of a world where my grandkids are deprived of not just freedom of speech, but freedom of thought… that scares me.

And it’s not like it can’t happen. It has. And it has always preceded totalitarianism. Because there is nothing more effective in establishing control over a population than establishing laws that restrict speech.

The best way to do that is to convince the population that certain types of speech should be illegal. So, they begin with the most offensive forms of speech and move outward from there. First, they outlaw racist, antireligious, and xenophobic speech. Then sexist and homophobic speech. Then any speech that is dubbed “hateful,” including anything that might be offensive to fat people, to short people, to sick and disabled people, and – what we see happening now – even to pedophiles.

The final hurdle in controlling speech and thereby controlling thought is to regulate humor.

Humor has always been the refuge for speech that would otherwise be politically and socially unacceptable. That’s because political and social humor has a message that totalitarians cannot abide. The message is: Relax. Stop fuming. None of us is perfect. All of us are flawed. Our flaws are human. They unite us. Let’s poke fun at our differences and, by doing so, recognize our common humanity.

In Europe and in America, the totalitarians have made good progress in recent years in their campaign against humor. Click here and here.

And here’s a way for you to judge for yourself: Could any of these very funny bits have been included in The Office if it were produced today?