More Countries Rejecting Leftist Economic Policies 

“First, it was Italy. Then came Finland and Greece. Spain could be next,” says Suzanne Lynch, writing for Politico. “Across Europe, governments are shifting right. In some places, far-right leaders are taking power. In others, more traditional center-right parties are allying with the right-wing fringes once considered untouchable.”

It is hard to deny. In the last year alone, conservatives and even far-right political groups came to power in a surprising number of elections.

Here are two of the most recent upsets…

The Netherlands Swings Back Toward the Center Right 

Geert Wilders 

Geert Wilders has been the victim of numerous death threats and has had to move between safe houses for nearly two decades. In 2009, the British government denied him entry, citing a threat to “community harmony and therefore public security.” And yet, somehow, it looks like he’ll soon be the next Prime Minister of the Netherlands.

Three links to help you better understand him. Click here and here and here.

And Now, Argentina…

Javier Milei 

In Saturday’s issue, I mentioned the surprise victory of Javier Milei, Argentina’s president-elect. Bill Bonner did some fact-checking on what the NYT and other left-tilting media have been saying about him. Click here.

 

Pro-Muslim, Anti-Jewish Prejudice Among Young People in America Is Bigger Than I Thought. And Growing! 

Another disturbing social trend that has surfaced since the beginning of the Hamas-Israeli conflict.

I understand that after decades of being told that Israel is a “colonizer” and an “occupying force” in Gaza, America’s university students would feel that the bombing of Gaza by the IDF is unjustified and even immoral. But what I mistakenly assumed was that these same young people had also been taught about the historical plight of the Jews – that they have been the victims of discrimination, ostracizing, governmental bullying, property confiscation, hate crimes, and, yes, actual genocide for thousands of years. And perhaps that the Jews have been in what is today called Palestine longer than the Muslims. And that Hamas (and Hezbollah and many other Muslim groups) have, as their stated goals, the destruction of Israel and the murder of every Jew on the planet.

Well, no. Apparently not. Because when it comes to hate crimes in America, they think Muslims, not Jews, are the real victims.

According to a WSJ-NORC poll, 44% of young Americans (ages 18 to 34) believe that Muslims in America are “subject to significant discrimination,” while only 33% do for Jews. Broken down by political party, the pro-Muslim, antisemitic sentiment is even greater among those that identify as Democrats. Click here.

Javier Milei [

A Big Surprising Win in Argentina for Javier Milei, a Self-Described “Anarcho Capitalist” 

In the last several days, Argentinians have been talking about almost nothing but the surprise victory of president-elect Javier Milei, an outspoken, sort-of Libertarian, on Nov. 19. Click here.

Argentina, as you probably know, has had some severe economic challenges in the past several years, as inflation has skyrocketed, making most Argentinians less able to pay for the necessities of life.

We asked our partner in Argentina for his thoughts:

“Yes, this is… a great ‘revolution’ for Argentina to have a Libertarian president. [Our country was] heading towards Venezuela and, magically, this guy appeared, won the election, and now he wants to redirect the economy towards Singapore! It’s totally crazy. If it were a movie, I wouldn’t believe it….

“The transition is going to be very complicated. We expect more inflation and loss of the value of the peso in the short term. But in the medium term, if things go well, inflation would have to disappear and we would have to either have a strong currency or use the dollar directly. But we need around six months to one year to see results.

“In the meantime, there is a risk that he will not be able to implement the reforms, because politicians and the unions will play against him. And if that happens, we will be back to square one.”

Teaching: Why Experience Matters

Bill Browder in Moscow 

Bill Browder is an extremely successful entrepreneur that made his fortune in Russia and wrote a good book about it – Red Notice. (You can read my review of it here.)

TS sent me this clip of him addressing a class of Russian Studies majors at Oxford. Pay attention to the content of his statements, especially when he is answering questions. These are thoughts that have been developed and defined by experience. They are not the sort of pronouncements made by pundits whose knowledge of their subject matter comes from secondary sources.

Also note the way he responds to some of the comments and questions that could be dismissed as naïve. Note the humility of his phrasing and the generosity of his willingness to respect his students’ preexisting ideas and impressions.

Then ask yourself: How common is this today in academia? How often do college and graduate students have the opportunity to learn from people that have (what they like to call) “lived experience” in the subject matter they teach?

Getting a degree in a good private college in the US will put a student in serious debt. Like $100,000 to $200,000. Wouldn’t you feel better about spending that kind of money if you knew you were getting this level of wisdom?

Click here.

Hamas vs. Israeli Killing: Is There a Moral Equivalence?

I was going to write an argument on the moral equivalency of the Muslim killings versus the Israeli killings in the current conflict, a topic that’s been debated daily on the Internet since Hamas attacked and slaughtered Israeli citizens on Oct. 7.

I was going to say that, whereas I agree with something one of my colleagues wrote (“The grief a Palestine mother feels over the murder of her child is no greater or less than the grief that an Israeli mother feels about the murder of her child”), one cannot reasonably argue that the purposeful beheading of an infant in front of its mother is morally equivalent to the death of a child killed by an Israeli rocket that hits a nearby “military target” of some kind, even if the Israeli commander that gave the go-ahead to bomb that building knew that some number of non-combatants, including children, would be killed as “collateral damage.”

Further, I was going to posit that there is a difference (an important difference) between the morality of an individual’s actions and the morality of the actions of an organized group.

One of the differences is that organized groups often have beliefs, principles, and codes of conduct that are definitively stated in declarations, constitutions, mission statements, and the like. Using this moral compass, I don’t see any moral equivalency between Hamas’s position in this war and that of the State of Israel because Hamas’s stated belief is that Jews are, by the nature of their infidelity, sub-human. And that a good and virtuous Hamas Muslim is one that murders Jews in a holy effort to vanquish Israel and rid the world of Jews.

I was going to say that self-defense is as close as one can get to a “human right” that virtually every state, and even every religion, agrees on. That principle justifies Israeli’s retaliation for the attack, but it doesn’t give Israeli carte blanche to eradicate not just every Hamas soldier but every Palestinian man, woman, and child living in Gaza. And although there have been some reactionaries on social media taking that stance, the State of Israel has not. Quite the contrary. It is making a public effort (if only for its own sake) to try to reduce the “collateral damage” done to Palestinian non-combatants.

And finally, I was going to recount a few things I witnessed when I was living in Africa that made me understand, in a way I will never forget, that there is a great range in terms of human decency between some cultures and others. That at one end of that range there are cultures one could fairly describe as civilized, and at the other end cultures that can be justly described as barbaric.

That was going to be the thrust of my argument. But just before getting to it, I read the following essay in the WSJ about what Dostoevsky might say. It provides yet another layer of ethical complication in trying figure out what is or is not morally justified behavior in war.

Click here.

Where Do You Stand on America’s Involvement in the Israeli/Hamas War?

Republican lawmakers are largely united on aiding Israel, but divided over whether to help Ukraine, while Democrats largely agree on assisting Ukraine but are torn on supporting Israel. In this WSJ report, White House reporter Sabrina Siddiqui reviews the range of opinions on both sides of the aisle, as well as reports on results of polls asking the opinion of US voters. Click here.

More food for thought…

Here are several good essays from The Free Press that shed light on the moral and tactical complications of our involvement.

Here’s a think piece I found on Dan Gardner’s blog that cautions us against the urge to label those whose opinions on Hamas are starkly different from ours.

And here’s yet another view from one of my favorite independently minded Communists, Freddie deBoer.

“Did You Write That?” 

Mustafa Taher Kasubhai, US District Judge nominee for the District of Oregon, at a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing last week 

Over the past several years, I’ve watched dozens of Congressional and Senate interviews of people nominated for important government positions. They are generally Biden nominees, and the interviews all seem to follow the same plotline.

First, the Democrat representatives toss the nominees softball questions, allowing them to strut their credentials. Then, the Republican representatives question them about opinions they’ve expressed on various politically sensitive topics in the past. Opinions that suggest they might approach their new jobs with bias.

The nominees first try to dismiss their former statements by putting them in an exculpatory context. “I was representing a client when I said that.” Or, “That was a college paper I wrote thirty years ago.” But when they are confronted with dozens of similar statements made over the years, including recent ones, they move to, “I don’t allow my political beliefs to influence my decisions.”

In my experience watching these interviews, the credibility of this line of defense ranges from hard-to-believe to “Are you kidding?”

Watch this one and tell me if you disagree.

Click here and here.

 

Let’s Be Reasonable

After a federal investigation into a complaint brought against them, United Airlines agreed to make concessions for passengers who use wheelchairs.

They did the right thing, I think… provided we’re talking about people who actually need wheelchairs – i.e., who use wheelchairs full-time. Not the oldsters that can walk perfectly well but ask for wheelchairs to get preferential treatment going through security and getting upfront seating.

Click here.

The Mysterious Math of Illegal Immigration

An unmarked white bus pulled up to an empty park in New Jersey in the wee hours of the morning. Out came about 50 recently arrived migrants. They had no idea where they were and no place to sleep that night.

The bus wasn’t sent by the borderline governors. It was part of an ongoing operation by the federal government, which has been dropping off undocumented immigrants in towns and cities all across the United States for three years.

San Diego, a self-declared Sanctuary City, has about a thousand beds available to accommodate bused-in migrants for several days until they can find another place to live. But in the past two weeks, the city has received an estimated 7,800 immigrants. So, immigration agents are leaving people on the streets, at bus stops, and in train stations, angering local officials and worrying aid groups.

Fact: There are 65,000 undocumented immigrants in New York City. Mayor Adams is calling it a crisis. But that is only one-tenth of 1% of the 6.5 million undocumented immigrants that have come into the country since President Biden took office.

We hear about San Diego and New York. But the numbers they report are in the tens of thousands, not the millions. Which begs the question: Where are all the other people? Who’s taking care of them and what is it costing?

Click here.

 

The COVID Pandemic Was Bad? You Ain’t Seen Nothin’ Yet!

Kate Bingham 

Were you freaked out by the COVID-19 warnings and mandates? Did you trust Dr. Fauci? Were you angered by all the “fake news” suggesting that the “facts” issued from the WHO and the CDC were without merit? Did you feel virtuous in doing everything you possibly could to protect yourself, your family, and even the entire nation?

Was all that a great deal of fun for you?

If so, you are going to like what Kate Bingham, the former chair of the UK Vaccine Taskforce, is saying.

According to The Long Shot, a book she wrote about her experience fighting COVID 19, as well as interviews she’s given to promote the book, COVID-19 is small potatoes compared to the next pandemic that will soon be at your doorstep. I’m talking about “Disease X.” (I didn’t make that up.) It’s the name of a virus that she and others of her ilk (including Bill Gates) predict will break out in the near future. A virus 100 times worse than COVID-19.

“Imagine a virus as infectious as measles with the fatality rate of Ebola [67%],” she says. “Somewhere in the world, it’s replicating, and sooner or later, somebody will start feeling sick.”

Read more about it here.

TED Talks: Ideas Worth… Spreading?

Coleman Hughes giving his TED Talk, “A Case for Color Blindness,” posted July 28 

On Saturday, I introduced you to Coleman Hughes, an up-and-coming Black Conservative whose TED Talk, in which he defended “color blindness,” I recommended. When Hughes discovered that there had been internal dissent over whether his talk should have been posted online, he published an essay in The Free Press titled “Why Is TED Scared of Color Blindness?” The next day, The Free Press published two of the many responses elicited by the essay – one from the head of TED and one from a prominent social scientist who was against the posting.

Click here to read their arguments.

And click here to listen to a debate between Coleman Hughes and Jamelle Bouie, an opinion columnist for the NYT, titled “Does Color Blindness Perpetuate Racism?”

I’m Feeling Good About the Supreme Court

Can we put aside the ruling on abortion for a moment? (Which I felt was correct from a constitutional point of view, although I’m in favor of mothers having the final say.)

I don’t think about the Supreme Court that often. But when the Biden administration issues executive orders that seem to me both insanely dangerous and unconstitutional, I think: Breathe. The Supreme Court will strike them down.

On the other hand, there are some cases that come to the Supreme Court that make me worry because of the possibly conservative bias of the justices. I worry (as I imagine Leftists and Liberals do) that the conservative justices will band together to make a decision that will be decided along “party” lines.

Happily, that’s not what happened this week. Chief Justice John Roberts and Brett Kavanaugh joined the court’s three left-leaning justices – Elena Kagan, Sonia Sotomayor, and Ketanji Brown Jackson – in striking down Alabama’s attempt to disenfranchise its Black voters.

Click here.

 

What’s Wrong with Color Blindness?

I’m adding Coleman Hughes to my list of Black Conservatives talking truth today. He’s young. But he’s smarter than his years. He also communicates his ideas and opinions clearly and carefully, which is a sorely needed skill for public influencers today. He has a growing online readership, and he’s being cited occasionally by the mainstream media. I see a big future for him, either as a major conservative thinker or a politician (if he makes the mistake of moving in that direction).

Recently, he gave a TED Talk on the subject of “color blindness” that provoked a backlash from some left-leaning, CRT-advocating, liberal advocacy groups that argue that color blindness is itself racist. Watch it here and decide for yourself.

 

Vaccine Conspiracies: Why Is Data Disappearing?

This is a disturbing story about how the province of Alberta, after years of tracking and reporting on claims of injury from the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine (as required by law), suddenly stopped publishing the data. Then they took it a step further by deleting all previous reports. This after the number of reports began mounting to scary heights.

In this, the last of a three-part series of interviews with Canadian Dr. William Makis, you can see what happened. (You can also access the first two parts from it.) Click here.

By the way, when I call this a conspiracy theory, it’s not because I think it’s untrue. On the contrary, I think it may be true, but I know that a large chunk of the people reading my account of it will assume it’s some sort of Russian or Right Wing generated fake news. If you find it hard to believe that the province of Alberta would do something so obviously unethical as deleting data that contradicts their biases, I invite you to hit the link, read the article, and decide for yourself. If you do so, and still think it’s a conspiracy theory, let me know how it is false. I’d like to know!

Conspiracy Update: The Election Fixing Plan Is in Full Swing

I almost can’t believe they’ve made this move so blatantly and so soon.

I’m talking about the Biden administration’s recent announcement that it was going to grant “temporary legal status” to hundreds of thousands of “undocumented” Venezuelans that have entered the US since Biden and Harris opened the borders in 2020.

The purpose, they say, is to make these people “eligible to work.” Huh? What has that got to do with anything? Illegal immigrants have no problem finding work in the US, so long as they are willing to work as unskilled laborers. And even if finding work was a problem, what’s the rationale behind giving 300,000 to 400,000 Venezuelans work permits but not the other +/- 7 million undocumented immigrants that crossed our southern border during the same period. What’s wrong with Argentinians? Or Salvadorans? Or Haitians. Or Iranians, for that matter?

It makes no sense.

Unless you subscribe to the theory I’ve been pushing since they opened the border so widely: This isn’t about kids in cages. Nor is it about people legitimately seeking asylum. (At best, that represents less than 5% of those that cross the border.) This is about a plan hatched before Biden was elected to flush in 10+ million, mostly poorly educated, mostly Latin Americans into the US, make them legal, and get them voting during the 2024 election.

Click here.

 

The “One-Government” Solution to Pandemics: Smart or Scary? 

Last Wednesday, on September 20, the UN hosted one of three high-level meetings on health with WHO officials attending. The publicized topic: “Pandemic Prevention, Preparedness, and Response.”

That sounds like exactly what a global, peace-seeking organization should be doing. Right?

I thought so until I read the objectives. Here are some of them:

* Coordination and governance at the highest political levels

* The fair, equitable, and timely sharing of benefits arising from the use of pathogens [and] sequences with pandemic potential

* Digital transformation of health systems; big data

* Monitoring and accountability

* Countering misinformation and disinformation

* More immunizations

So, how does that sound to you? Smart or scary?