Making Promises I Can’t Keep

I spent 10 days at Rancho Santana at the end of March. It was the first of what I hope will be at least a half-dozen trips down there this year and thereafter.

Key word: “hope.”

Each time I go down to Nicaragua’s Pacific Coast, I’m somehow startled by how beautiful that part of the country is. I shouldn’t be surprised. I’ve been there probably a hundred times since I first set eyes on it in 1996.

And yet I always am.

I have the same surprise every time I return to the family house in Delray Beach. I think, “Wow! What a great house! And what a great view of the ocean.” Two or three times a year, when MM is in town, he persuades me to walk across the street and take a dip in the ocean, and I think, “Man! I gotta do this every day!”

But I never do.

What’s with that? I’m the guy that has always prided himself on making life-improvement promises to myself and keeping them! I even wrote a book – The Pledge – to help others accomplish their life goals.

Oh, well.

The Challenge of Waking Up Early 

I’ve just made another promise to myself that I hope to keep: to wake up at six a.m., no matter what time I went to sleep the night before.

In my younger years, I woke when I woke – usually after getting seven hours of sleep. If I turned off the lights off at 11:00 p.m., I woke up at 6:00. If I closed my eyes at 2:00 a.m., I woke up at 9:00. I figured it didn’t matter what time I woke up so long as I got in enough work hours to complete my task list for the day.

That rationale was somewhat successful. I managed to outwork most of my colleagues and competitors, which allowed me to quickly climb the responsibility ladder of every business I was in.

I retired at 39 and spent about 18 months focusing on becoming a serious fiction writer – a goal that I had for as long as I can remember, but pretty much abandoned while focusing on making money. I had about a dozen short stories published and even won two literary awards. But an opportunity to write a travel newsletter morphed into a second career in business, which I took up with the same intensity I had given my businesses before.

Another 10 years went by, and they were good ones for me in terms of achieving new business goals and increasing my net worth. But I once again managed to sideline my writing goals.

A Book That Changed My Life 

I happened to read a book by Stephen Covey at that time – The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People. In it, Covey pointed out that most people fail to achieve their youthful goals because they make the mistake of letting the urgencies of their life take priority. And that led to the realization that if I wanted to accomplish my once-cherished writing goals, I had to make that my top priority.

Making writing my top priority meant doing it first – before I got to work at nine o’clock. Which meant I had to get up early enough to be able to devote two full hours to it before I “clocked in.”

So that’s what I did.

In fact, I began writing a digital newsletter at the time to share and document my new and improved plan. I called the newsletter, appropriately, Early to Rise.

In the ensuing 20 years, I was finally able to achieve both my business and my writing goals by following the get-up-early advice I’d been urging others to follow. I managed to write and publish more than two dozen books and write and/or produce three movies.

Perhaps because of that success, I have, since I turned 70, gradually loosened up on my self-imposed “early-to-rise” pledge to the point where I was going to bed at one or two in the morning and waking up at eight or nine.

I suppose I could justify that by claiming to be “semi-retired.” But it wasn’t making me happy. I still have plenty of work to do before I shuffle off this mortal coil, including making two more movies and finishing no less than 17 half-finished books!

And so it was that, two weeks ago, I resolved to return to my six o’clock waking time to give myself one last run at the work I have yet to do.

So far, so good. I’ll let you know how things progress in the weeks and months ahead.

This Trip to Rancho Santana

I fell in love with Rancho Santana’s ocean views when I first went down in 1996.

Since then, I’ve been there at least a hundred times, and I find something new every time that startles and pleases me.

Sometimes, it’s the way the weather changes – from the dry season, to the wet season, to the windy season, and then to the winter season, which is the nicest of them all. Other times, it’s some improvement in the resort itself – a new pool, a new bike path, a pair of new horses at the stable, or the completion of some new amenity such as the gym at Fun Limón or the newly built chapel on a hill.

This year, my experience of the place was very different, because I had some first-time visitors to share it with.

Mixing Pleasure with Business 

For the first half of this 10-day visit, I had RT with me, a friend and BJJ mentor, plus his wife (AT) and daughter (VT).

RT and family 

I got in some good training with RT. He was preparing for the Pan Am Championships, which took place a few days after he returned to the States, so his pace and strength were a bit higher than average.

Here we are – RT and I – after training at Rancho Santana a few years ago.

He’s won gold something like 16 times in a row, so I’d like to believe that his training with me has had a positive effect on him as well as on me.

 

The Mules Trot Down 

The Mules, the book club I’ve been a part of for at least 15 years, had our March meeting in Nicaragua this year, instead of our usual place at my “cigar bar” in Delray Beach. Eleven of the 16 current members made it down to Rancho Santana. (The others were linked in on Zoom.)

When I invited them in January, I thought I’d be lucky to get six to come along. I was pleased and not a little flattered to find out how many wanted to see this resort community that my partners and I have been building for 26 years.

Rancho Santana has been getting great reviews from travel publications and websites for the last eight or 10 years. But we are billed as a five-star resort, and since most of the Mules are used to five-star accommodations, I was anxious to see what they thought of our amenities and service.

It was a short trip for them, arriving Thursday night and leaving Monday morning, but they managed to see and enjoy a lot – the bike and hiking trails, the horseback riding, the Spa, the beaches, and the food.

The Mules at La Boquita, one of Rancho Santana’s four eateries

It was all good. Good food. Good daytime activities. Good conversations over tequila and/or rum after dinner. But the best part about it turned out to be something I don’t think any of us expected.

How to Explain? 

Over the many years we’ve been together, we Mules have had plenty of time to get to know one another.

And we do… in a limited way.

* We know who is always punctual and who is always late.

* We know which of us are well prepared and which are not.

* We know that CL will talk about the believability and likeability of the book’s characters, that BS will comment on the story’s moral implications, that SL will bring his copy with passages tagged to read to us, that GG will ask us why we didn’t see the obvious biblical allusions – and that by the end of the back-and-forth, we will all feel the value of these diverse and equitable contributions.

In short, our book club has given us the value of knowing each other’s way of thinking and manner of expressing opinions and ideas…

But until this trip, we were, in fact, an amalgamation of several different groups of people. There was the original group, consisting of a half-dozen men who knew one another well that I joined as a new member. And then there were three additional groups: three friends of mine that were at one time colleagues in the direct marketing industry, two guys in their early fifties that I knew from my cigar bar, and three guys in their mid-thirties that I befriended through Number Three Son.

Since I knew all of them quite well, it never occurred to me that the different groups knew very little about the other members on a personal level. However well they understood their book club personalities, they knew very little about their personal stories or their interests in a whole world of things outside of books.

And that’s what most of our conversations were about this time – conversations that were being had throughout the four-day weekend.

So by the time we were saying our goodbyes, there was a shocking number of bro-hugs and “love-ya-mans” going on. We had extended our bookish acquaintanceships into emerging friendships, and that seemed to be a happy development for everyone.

Note: When I recounted this to K, she rolled her eyes and said, “You men. You’re unbelievable! How could you know each other for years and have gotten to know so little about each other!”

15 Brief Essays and Articles Worth Reading 

1. “A Rare Trifecta”
Joel Bowman, Substack

Joel Bowman is a smart man and a good writer. In this essay, he highlights three major global developments: a surprising pivot toward peace in Europe regarding the Ukraine conflict, a renewed commitment from Donald Trump to balance the US budget through a “zero deficit” strategy, and political and economic upheaval in Argentina. Read it here.

2. “Biden Lied About Everything…”
Matt Taibbi, Racket News

Matt Taibbi reacts to a NYT exposé detailing how US and NATO leaders, including President Biden, misled the public on the scope and risk of the Ukraine war. The article portrays the revelations as a historic betrayal, alleging that the administration escalated conflict while publicly downplaying nuclear risk for political reasons. Read it here.

3. “The Family of a Murdered Gaza Protester Speaks Out”
Tanya Lukyanova, The Free Press

A harrowing report about the murder of 22-year-old Uday al-Rabbay by Hamas in Gaza. The article includes firsthand accounts from his family, describing his activism against Hamas, the brutal torture he endured, and the chilling message left with his body. It provides rare insight into dissent and repression within Gaza. Read it here.

4. “How Many Millions Are Fraudulently Receiving Social Security Checks…”
Michael Snyder, Substack

Alleging widespread fraud in US entitlement programs, particularly Social Security, the article highlights discrepancies between official enrollment numbers and census data, raises concerns about non-citizens obtaining Social Security numbers, and features Elon Musk as a whistleblower revealing massive abuse in the system. Read it here.

5. “Jay Bhattacharya: ‘Fauci’s Pardon Is a Good Thing’”
Maya Sulkin, The Free Press

An interview with Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, now head of the NIH, reflecting on his public vilification during COVID for opposing lockdowns. He discusses being targeted by Anthony Fauci and Francis Collins but advocates for forgiveness and learning from past mistakes. The article underscores the political and scientific fallout of pandemic-era policies. Read it here.

6. “Lawfare à la Française Against Marine Le Pen”
The Wall Street Journal

An editorial criticizing a French court ruling against right-wing politician Marine Le Pen, suggesting it is politically motivated “lawfare” intended to block her 2027 presidential run. The piece argues the verdict undermines democracy by targeting opposition through legal means rather than open political competition. Read it here.

7. “Luigi Mangione Fans ‘Coming in Hot’ After News of Death Penalty”
Olivia Reingold, The Free Press

After the DOJ announced it would seek the death penalty for Luigi Mangione – charged with murdering UnitedHealthcare’s CEO – his supporters rapidly donated over $12,000 to his legal fund, framing him as a folk hero fighting corporate injustice. The case has sparked widespread online activism, including ballot initiatives targeting insurance companies. Read it here.

8. “No Deportations Without Due Process”
The Free Press

This editorial criticizes the Trump administration’s deportation of pro-Palestinian student activists without public evidence or due process. It centers on the case of Rumeysa Ozturk, a Turkish PhD student accused of ties to Hamas, raising civil liberties concerns and sparking bipartisan alarm over potential violations of free speech. Read it here.

9. “Elon Musk and the American Majority”
The Wall Street Journal

This opinion piece highlights new polling showing strong bipartisan support for reducing government waste – bolstering Elon Musk’s position as head of the Dept. of Government Efficiency despite media attacks. The column argues that Democrats are failing to win over even their own base on spending issues. Read it here.

10. “Why Did Biden Put Tulsi Gabbard Under Government Surveillance?”
Jack Hunter and Rand Paul, Rand Paul Review

Sen. Rand Paul demands answers after learning that Tulsi Gabbard, now Director of National Intelligence, was placed on the TSA’s surveillance list during the Biden administration. The article alleges politically motivated targeting and warns of the growing use of federal surveillance against dissenters. Read it here.

11. “The left AGAIN tries to use the courts to thwart democracy”
Alex Berenson, Unreported Truths

Berenson draws parallels between France’s disqualification of Marine Le Pen from running in 2027 and the American left’s legal tactics against Trump. He frames both as elite-driven efforts to undermine populist political movements through judicial overreach. Read it here.

12. “Trump Wins a Big One on Executive Power”
The Wall Street Journal 

The editorial celebrates a DC Circuit ruling that affirms the president’s authority to fire heads of independent federal agencies. The case could head to the Supreme Court, potentially reshaping the balance of power between the executive branch and regulatory bureaucracy. Read it here.

13. “What I Saw at the MAGA Revolution” 
Matthew Continetti, The Free Press

Continetti reflects on the ideological evolution of the New Right from 2016 to 2025, noting how Trump-aligned populism has overtaken traditional conservatism. He cautions that the movement now faces a choice: Become a serious governing philosophy or devolve into grievance and chaos. Read it here.

14. “Will Cartel Members Now Face Execution?”
Madeleine Rowley, The Free Press

The US has designated several Mexican cartels as foreign terrorist organizations, expanding its legal power to seize assets and pursue capital punishment. The move signals a dramatic escalation in the war on drug trafficking, with bipartisan support and major implications for US-Mexico relations. Read it here.

15. “Legal Battles Against Trump Advance in Blue-State Territory”
Jess Bravin, The Wall Street Journal

Almost all the 140-plus lawsuits against Trump policies have been filed in federal circuits where Democratic appointees predominate. Conservative groups and Republican-led states funneled lawsuits against Biden administration policies into a handful of jurisdictions, particularly the Fifth Circuit, perhaps the most conservative federal appeals court, which oversees Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas. Read it here.

 

10 Brief YouTube Videos for Your Amusement 

1. Beatboxer recreating the Thomas the Tank Engine theme song. 
Watch Time: 54 sec.

Hiss, a South Korean beatboxer, recreates the theme song for Thomas the Tank Engine (from the children’s show Thomas & Friends) by layering on beats and harmonies emanating entirely through his mouth.

2. Lefties losing it outside Tesla dealerships.
Watch Time: 16 min.

A video report by Ford Fischer documents a series of anti-Elon Musk protests in seven US cities, accompanied by counter protesters defending Musk and Tesla. The piece captures the cultural clash surrounding Musk, with both supporters and detractors expressing strong opinions, often face-to-face, on public sidewalks and in intense exchanges.

3. CouplaBeers commercial.
Watch Time: 2.39 min.

SNL is getting funny again. Here’s a great skit starring and probably written by Sean Gillis, which is why it’s funny.

4. His sportsmanship won everyone’s heart. 
Watch Time: 45 sec.

This sort of sportsmanship is rare in professional sports today. But when you see it, it makes you wonder how it became passé.

5. The hairiest face in the world.
Watch Time: 3.14 min.

Hypertrichosis is a very rare disease that caused excessive hair to grow all over his body. In an astonishing display of bad taste on the part of the Guinness organization and an equally shameful level of bad judgement on my part, I bring you Lalit Patidar, a teenager from India, who has just won the World Record for “hairiest face on a male person.” If you watch the entire thing, the guilt you feel about clicking the link may diminish.

6. Amazing billiards shot.
Watch Time: 50 sec.

Got a few seconds for a trick shot in billiards that is hard to believe? (I checked. It’s real.)

7. Gravity explained by Muppets.  
Watch Time: 5 min.

You may have heard that one of the fascinating aspects of the law of gravity is that two objects that have very different weights (such as a feather and a bar of lead) will drop to the ground at the same rate of speed.  That’s what I thought. Here, two Muppets (that I’ve never seen before) visit Adam Savage (of Tested fame) to explain some of the facts about gravity, such as air resistance.

8. Baby chicks cuddle on a blind cat’s belly.
Watch Time: 1.5 min. 

Here’s something to warm your cold heart. A blind cat named Mr. Fox has such a calming personality that he’s able to make the most unlikely of friends – including dogs, rabbits, and even baby birds.

9. Guitarist adds heavy metal to a Bulgarian folk song.
Watch Time: 2.31 min.

I bet you’ve never heard of Bre Petrunko. I didn’t – before I saw this clip of a Bulgarian choir singing it, with Andre Antunes, a Bulgarian rock musician, adding some electronic licks. One critic praised his performance for giving “these singers great respect, letting their voices shine through as he plays.”

I thought it was kind of great, so I looked up the song. Here are the lyrics in Bulgarian…

Bre Petrunko, malay mome
Vse yodime yobidome
Nigde yoro ne naydo me
V vashe selo dor tri yora
Parvo yoro Petrunkino
Petrunitsa yoro vodi
Yozdol ide ludo mlado
Ne se fana na sredata
Nay se fana na tanetso
Na tanetso do Petrunka
S per iko si kitka roni
S nozde si yi ekli kalya

And in English…

Hey Petrunka, young girl
We’ve gone all over
Nowhere did we find a dance
In your village there are three dances
The first dance is little Petrunka’s
Little Petrunka leads the dance
Up came a wild fellow
He doesn’t go to the middle
But he joins at the head
At the head by Petrunka
He tears her bouquet with his forehead
He muddies her slippers with his feet

10. Would you take a ride with this guy?
Watch Time: 3.17 min.

Watch Glorioso, a Peruvian bus driver, navigate an incredibly treacherous route through the rough terrain and tight turns of the Peruvian Andes. Glorioso, who has been driving this route for over 12 years, stated that it requires both calm and confidence.

Food for Thought

“Emerson said a man is what he thinks about all day long. I’d say a man is what he does all day long. What he thinks about is what he is not.” – Michael Masterson

Hint: It was painted between 1490 and 1510 by a Dutch artist who is among the most famous and influential figures in the history of Western art. He is one of the most notable representatives of the Early Netherlandish painting school.

Answer: The Garden of Earthly Delights by Hieronymus Bosch

This is the center panel of a triptych that depicts a progression from Eden, through a world of earthly pleasures, to Hell, and is often interpreted as a cautionary tale against sin and temptation.

Singing with Reggie 

A random vacationer has a random conversation with Reggie (who does a lot of these YouTube vlogs) and then draws a big crowd when he sings Dock of the Bay and then an encore, Walking After Midnight. Click here.

Watch Time: about 12 min.

Was Yesterday “Liberation Day”? 

Trump has been talking about tariffs for a long time – at least since he ran for president in 2016. He talked more aggressively about them on the campaign trail in 2024.

So if he does what he said he was going to do – and he’s so far had an unusual fidelity to last year’s campaign promises – the US economy, and that of the entire world, will be different by the end of this year. Possibly greatly different. Whether that will be good for Americans and our trading partners is yet to be seen. But it should be a wild ride.

No, I’m Not an Expert on Global Trade Theory

I was late to taking a serious interest in economics. As a high school and college student, I was seduced by second-hand Marxist theory. In protesting against the Vietnam War, I was also (I thought) protesting the evils of Capitalism.

My views began to change when I got married and had a family. Making enough money to take care of my own was a serious obligation. I took it seriously and put my Marxist views away.

In 1982, after accepting a job as editor-in-chief for a company that published business newsletters, I began to read in some depth about how companies thrive and survive in a free market economy.

When, several years later, we began publishing investment newsletters, I was exposed to the realities of the real economy. I could no longer hold any of my former Marxist views, although I maintained the humane sentiments that I always believed were the moral bedrock of Socialist theory.

And then later, when I decided to “get rich” and began starting and owning businesses, any vestigial inclination to government control of the economy disappeared completely.

But I Have Read Hayek, von Mises, and Friedman!

I began my formal education in the early 1990s by consuming the works of Friedrich Hayek, Ludwig von Mises, and other prominent thinkers of the Austrian School of Economics.

But it wasn’t until recently that I exposed myself to Milton Friedman. I devoured his essays and watched videos of his speeches and debates, and I loved everything he said.

Friedman’s logic was simple and compelling: Tariffs (or import quotas) raise prices for consumers, waste resources, and ultimately cost more than they benefit.

In one famous critique, he argued that it’s “utter nonsense” to insist on reciprocal tariffs – after all, “exports are the cost of trade, imports the return from trade, not the other way around.”

In his view, even if other countries protect their markets, the wise course for America is to move unilaterally toward free trade, rather than “adding insult to injury” by imposing its own restrictions. This free-trade idealism became part of my DNA. I believed that free trade benefits all economies in the long run and that any form of protectionism was a step backward.

So when Donald Trump burst onto the scene with a tariff-centric trade strategy, it clashed with everything I thought I knew. I had long equated tariffs with economic self-harm. To me, his aggressive stance on trade felt like watching someone light a match near a powder keg. As a faithful Friedmanite, I was skeptical from the start.

In this issue, I give you the history – or perhaps I should say the evolution – of my thinking about Trump’s tariff plans since he was elected last November. I’ll tell you what the traditional thinking is and what the new thinking is, and how they are probably both wrong. At least to some degree.

Many people – perfectly smart and well-educated people – think that trade policy, including tariffs, is an obscure, academic subject that doesn’t rate in importance compared to… say… discrimination, social justice, and crime.

If you feel that way now, I hope you’ll continue reading so you can decide for yourself what this means.

Tariffs and Free Trade: Theory vs. Reality
And My Evolving View of Trump’s Trade Strategy 

When Trump first started slapping tariffs on imports and threatening trade wars, I found myself cringing. I recall reading former Reagan budget director David Stockman’s scathing critique of Trump’s obsession with “winning” on trade by tallying up bilateral deficits and surpluses.

Stockman argued that Trump’s metric – the bilateral trade balance with each country – is “about the closest thing to meaningless statistical noise” one could find. In other words, fixating on whether we run a deficit or surplus with Country X misses the bigger picture of overall trade and economic welfare.

I shared those concerns. It seemed to me that Trump viewed trade as a zero-sum scoreboard, where any deficit meant we were “losing.”

My Miltonian education told me that unilateral tariffs would invite retaliation and hurt American exporters, while consumers at home would pay higher prices. Early on, many analysts warned of exactly that: higher costs for US businesses and families, disrupted supply chains, and alienated allies. Even some conservative free-marketers warned that a broad tariff war could backfire. I nodded along with those criticisms, worried that Trump was ignoring the timeless lesson that there are no real winners in trade wars – often everyone loses, even if one side loses less.

In theory, I remained convinced that Trump’s tariffs were a mistake. I feared we’d see the classic consequences: prices up, economic output down, and strained relations with trading partners.

And indeed, studies later found that the initial rounds of 2018–2019 tariffs produced a net negative impact on the US economy, shaving about 0.2% off long-run GDP and costing around 142,000 American jobs. A 2023 update by the US International Trade Commission reinforced this, noting that US importers bore 93% of the tariff costs on Chinese goods, and that prices increased significantly in categories like steel, aluminum, appliances, and electronics.

Those numbers reinforced my doubts. As an unabashed free-trader, I was hard-pressed to find much good in the tariff-heavy approach… at least at first.

A New Perspective

Despite my theoretical misgivings, as Trump’s trade battles unfolded, I began to see a different side of the argument. It started to dawn on me that tariffs aren’t just economic policy tools, they’re also geopolitical leverage.

In 2019, Trump threatened Mexico with tariffs unless they curbed illegal immigration. Mexico responded by deploying 6,000 troops to its southern border within days, agreeing to expand its “Remain in Mexico” policy for asylum seekers.

That surprised even skeptics. Since returning to office, Trump has revived this strategy, linking tariff threats to border enforcement and fentanyl trafficking. In early 2025, the administration announced 10% tariffs on select Chinese pharmaceuticals unless China strengthened export controls on fentanyl precursors – which Beijing quietly agreed to monitor more closely by March.

I couldn’t deny the pragmatic effectiveness of this use of tariffs. But would the economic cost outweigh the social and political gains? There were essays and articles being published at the time that defended Trump’s use of tariffs as a “big stick” with any number of trade partners. One argument that had me second-guessing my bias against tariffs: Global trade is so imbalanced in terms of supply and demand that the Miltonian prediction of reciprocal tariffs and trade wars wouldn’t happen. In a tariff standoff, “America holds all the cards,” one analyst said. Another analyst, writing for The Heritage Foundation, pointed out that US trading partners rely far more on access to the US market than the US does on theirs. The effect: The US wins if other countries submit to Trump’s demands and we win even bigger if the dispute evolves into an escalatory fight.

In the early days of Trump’s tenure, Canadian and European leaders objected furiously to his tariff threats. But by the end of March, the Office of the US Trade Representative was confirming rumors that several EU countries had reduced their industrial subsidies to avoid new steel tariffs that Trump threatened to impose.

Trump’s Tariffs – What the Data Show 

1. Economic Impact of 2018–2019 Tariffs

* Reduced US GDP by 0.2%, costing an estimated 142,000 jobs. [Source: Tax Foundation, 2020]

* US importers paid 93% of the costs of Section 301 tariffs on Chinese goods. [Source: US International Trade Commission, 2023]

* Price hikes in affected goods (e.g., appliances, steel) averaged 10–20% within months of implementation. [Source: Federal Reserve Bank of New York, 2020]

2. Geopolitical Leverage

* In 2019, Trump’s tariff threat led Mexico to deploy 6,000 National Guard troops to its southern border within days. [Source: US Dept. of State, June 2019]

* In 2025, China agreed to stricter monitoring of fentanyl precursor exports following US tariff threats on pharmaceutical inputs. [Source: White House Press Office, March 2025]

* EU nations in March 2025 agreed to reduce certain industrial subsidies to avoid new US steel tariffs. [Source: US Trade Representative, 2025]

3. Tariffs as Policy Tools

* Trump administration argues tariff threats create a “win-win”: Either partners drop their own trade barriers or the US collects revenue from imports. [Paraphrased from Scott Bessent, Newsmax interview]

* Countries more dependent on US markets have less leverage to retaliate. [Source: The Heritage Foundation, 2024]

It was no longer possible to deny that Trump’s willingness to use tariffs for strategic leverage was having some positive outcomes. His demands, in many instances, put the US in a better negotiating position and in other cases resulted in a more level playing field in terms of trade imbalances. Still, these were short-term strategies to achieve short-term political and economic results. The Miltonian argument – that they would eventually end up inflating the costs of goods and services – was not denied by those short-term wins.

So, while I reserve my skepticism about the long-term inflationary effects of these tariffs, I’m happy about the short-term benefits they have already achieved and I’m hopeful that if Trump’s promised tax breaks are large enough to have their effect, the US GDP will begin to rise on the tide of those billions of dollars floating into the private sector, along with the general optimism that could bubble up among the wealth-producing classes.

Recently, Trump has thrown out the idea that if he can raise tariff income enough, the US government would no longer need income taxes to fund its projects. On the face of it, that seems like a nutty idea.

But let’s see. In 2024, the federal government collected $2.4 trillion in individual income taxes plus another $2.5 trillion in corporate and other taxes for a total of $4.9 trillion. But it spent $6.7 trillion, leaving a deficit of about $1.8 trillion.

Elon Musk, perhaps the greatest patriot in American history since Patrick Henry, is trying to reduce that deficit by $1 trillion. If, by some miracle, the liberal and lefty lunatics in the Beltway let him do that, and let’s say a Trump tax cut would generate another $1 trillion in corporate and other tax revenue, the dollar figure to run the country would be about $4.7 trillion.

That would balance the budget. But to eliminate the income tax, Trump would have to successfully boost tariffs by $2.4 trillion. Last year, the US collected a mere $700 billion in tariff revenue. Trump says that if his scheme for creating an “external revenue system” through taxes happens, he can raise more than six times that much!

Oddly, running the numbers that way feels like Trump’s big idea could actually work. But I’m sure I’m missing something. It doesn’t seem possible that Trump, or anyone, could reverse the US trade deficit to that degree.

The Elephant in the Room 

Thinking about federal spending and income taxes and federal debt reminds me of what is for me the fiscal elephant in the room.

The federal deficit today is $36 trillion. To most Americans – in fact, to I’m sure many if not most people reading this now – that figure has become a meaningless abstraction. A number that fear-mongering conservatives keep talking about that has no bearing on the experience of the ordinary US taxpayer.

That is, of course, insanely wrong. Since the beginning of this millennium, US presidents and politicians from both sides of the political divide have been working in lockstep on one project: trying to buy votes by spending money the government doesn’t have. The cost of financing this debt – i.e., the amount of interest the US government must pay on this debt – will be nearly a trillion dollars this year. Add to that the $2 trillion budget deficit our government representatives dig us into every year, and you have a debt burden for each US taxpayer of about $235,000 that is going up about $20,000 a year.

That debt bubble is going to burst sooner or later. If it bursts in the next four years, there is no amount of tariff money that will save us.

Back to Trump’s tariff ideas. Where do I stand now?

I still believe, as Milton Friedman did, in the long-term benefits of free trade. But I now also believe there is room for tariffs as a tactical tool – especially when dealing with countries that flagrantly exploit trade imbalances or refuse to cooperate on key geopolitical issues. Used selectively and strategically, tariffs can create leverage and bring adversaries to the table.

But we must be careful not to let tariffs become the policy, rather than a means to an end. As policy, it could lead to protectionism, economic inefficiency, and a potential return to the very trade wars we should be trying to avoid.

From SL re GM’s letter in the March 19 issue (“Why are the Dems so upset about DOGE?”) 

“I agree with GM. How can any sane, tax-paying citizen object to reducing the amount of waste, fraud, and inefficiency within the federal government? Just about every president in recent memory has pledged to do the same thing, including both Clintons, both Bushes, Obama, and even, when he was younger, Sleepy Joe himself. They all made these pronouncements and promises when they were running for office – because they knew that most American voters wanted to clean up the swamp. The difference between them and Trump now is that Trump has put someone competent enough in charge of the job and also given him the support he needs to finish it. The Dems reaction? Let’s incinerate the very cars we used to love because they are green!”

Re my review of The Blind Watchmaker in the March 13 issue 

From CD: “Interesting book. However, my favorite is The God Delusion. I have always, since a very young age, thought that religion was just silly. I could never understand why smart people that I looked up to were believers. I always kept quiet about my beliefs, thinking I was on my own. The God Delusion was such a relief! Thanks, Mark, always enjoy your letter…”

My Response: Thanks, CD. I appreciate your suggestion. I’m putting it on my to-read list!

From GT: “Thanks for recommending The Blind Watchmaker. I’m reading it now and, so far, it’s as good as you said it was.”

From PL re the “Just Briefs” issues 

“I’m enjoying the ‘Just Briefs’ issues. I read them when I want to be amused, rather than enlightened. In the last one, I loved the clips of that guy who sings to farm animals. Where do you get these? You must be spending way too much time on YouTube.”

My Response: Thanks, PL. And yes, I am! (See one of my favorites in today’s PS.)

From SH: re Big Pharma 

“Whenever we come into the US, we see Pharma ads for every conceivable illness. Such is not the case here in Germany! Yes, obesity is a huge problem, much of it to do with poor nutrition. It can be seen in every segment of society. But as you know, America is short-term thinking, and many people want everything cheap, including health care. Cheap means low price, but also poor quality.

“What many question here in Europe, is why so much money is spent for elections, on politicians. Why are US presidential elections so long in taking place? Germany elects in less than six weeks!” – SH

“Big Pharma can pay the lawsuits and still make billions!” – BW