Giving Speeches and Other Frightening Experiences 

I’ve read that, next to dying, most people fear public speaking more than anything else.

I get that. I know what it is like to stand in front of an audience of several hundred people who are waiting to see if you are about to tell them something that is worth an hour or two of their time.

Having given dozens of speeches in my career, I can attest to the growing anxiety one feels as the day of performance draws near. It’s similar to how I feel before a Jiu Jitsu competition, where I face glory or embarrassment in front of onlookers who, I’ve convinced myself, are there not to see any of the other dozens of competitors, but just little old me.

My Jiu Jitsu friends that have competed hundreds of times over many years tell me that the anxiety lessens over time. And I am happy to report that my anxiety about public speaking has likewise diminished over the last 40 years.

In about a week, in Tokyo, I’ll be speaking to the largest group I’ve ever faced: 2,000 Japanese people that have paid money to hear me speak about business, entrepreneurship, and wealth building.

As my confidence in speaking grew over the years and my anxiety ebbed, I adopted the practice of doing very little preparation – just spending an hour or two thinking about what I was going to say, putting down a few notes on an index card, and ad-libbing the actual speech.

But this time I will be in front of 2,000 people and I’ll be speaking for three hours and – to make matters worse – I was asked to prepare written notes on my presentation to help the simultaneous translators do their jobs well. And so I spent many hours and wrote thousands of words and even prepared 56 slides to illustrate the points I intended to make – something I’d never done before.

Yes, I am feeling anxious right now, and I’m sure that anxiety will build in the next five or six days. But I’m sure it won’t get as bad as the anxiety I was feeling leading up to the presentation I made earlier today (I’m writing this on Saturday evening) at the Cornell Art Museum right here in Delray Beach. The subject: Central American Modernism, the book that Suzanne Snider, my partner, and I spent eight years researching and writing.

When I started writing books, I developed a fear about public speaking that I had not confronted before – the fear that I would appear at some random bookstore to talk about one of my books and find myself in a room of 50 or 60 chairs on which sat only five or six people.

That fear was so great that in my contract with John Wiley, which published many of my bestselling books, I had myself exempted from the obligation to face that sort of humiliation.

But there I was this morning, heading from my car to the museum, heart pounding, prepared to be mortified. And sure enough, when I climbed to the museum’s second floor and peeked into the room where Suzanne and I were going to speak, there were about 50 neatly arranged little white chairs on which about a half-dozen people were sitting.

I almost turned around and walked away. But I stayed. And minute by minute, people began strolling in and taking seats. By speaking time, to my utter delight, it was standing room only. And afterwards, for a good half-hour, Suzanne and I were both surrounded by people who wanted to chat about what we had said. And the comments were kind.

That put me in a good and confident mood for the rest of the afternoon. But it’s 8:15 in the evening now, and K and I are waking at 5:30 tomorrow morning to catch our planes to Japan. And already I’m feeling that slowly percolating dread that I thought I had completely subdued many years ago.

Wish me luck.

By Percival Everett
320 pages
Published March 19, 2024

James – a reimagining of Mark Twain’s Adventures of Huckleberry Finn from the perspective of Jim, the runaway slave – was The Mules book selection for June. And when I started reading it, I thought, “Oh boy! Here we go with another woke narrative.” Which is to say that, though the reviews were overwhelmingly laudatory (“Gripping!”… “Thrilling!”… “Genius!”… “Masterpiece!”… etc., etc.), I was prejudiced against it from the get-go.

There were sections of the novel that didn’t pass muster for me in terms of what T.S. Eliot called the “objective correlative” – a concept in literary criticism suggesting that the emotions of a character should be expressed through external objects, a situation, or a chain of events that can evoke those emotions in the reader. But as I moved through it, I was caught up in the plot itself, which is always the most important (and for the author the most difficult) part. Then I began to admire Percival Everett for his undeniably high marketing intelligence – i.e., creating a novel that would have Huckleberry Finn, one of the most loved and accomplished novels in American fiction, serve as a springboard for the success of this book – and his equally impressive literary skills.

James is a novel that aimed to be not just a bestseller but also a literary award winner, both of which lofty goals Everett achieved.

But here’s the thing… it had a remarkably divisive effect on The Mules, with half the group strongly liking it and the other half disgusted by it. We’ve had plenty of disagreements over books before, but I can’t remember the opinions being so neatly divided and so strongly felt on each side.

I liked more about James than I disliked – and since I consider my opinion the correct one, I can recommend it to you without qualification. But I found it interesting that 100% of those that hated the book had read it, while 100% of those that liked it had listened to it.

I thought about that later that night, and sent this email to the rest of the group:

I have, as some of you know, produced three movies. The first was terrible. The second was bad. And the third was “not bad.” (But not good.)

Despite the low quality of two of the three scripts (which I wrote), I did discover something about acting that surprised me. I noticed that most of the actors that tried out for a part somehow managed to emphasize the badness of my lines, but there were a few that somehow made them work.

I had been a devotee of the auteur view of cinema: that the director is the one and only person that can make a movie succeed or fail. But this experience taught me what a difference good acting can make.

So, it might be that the actor(s) on the audio version of James were good enough to make the lines that didn’t work for those of us who read the book believable to those of us that listened to it.

That’s my two cents…

It’s Not Us… It’s Russia! 

First, they sabotaged Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign…

Then, after we threatened to do it, they sabotaged their primary source of revenue by blowing up the Nord Stream pipeline…

Then, after we added trillions to US debt by all the COVID relief spending and inflation kicked in… well, it turns out it wasn’t the Fed. They caused it!

And then, thanks to 51 top intelligence officials, we found out that Hunter Biden’s laptop was not real but “textbook” propaganda from them!

It’s amazing how vigilant and successful those Russian propagandists are. It’s even more amazing how they’ve seemed to be behind every setback, embarrassment, and failure of the Democrats since 2016!

And they are still at it.

You know those videos circulating on social media showing President Biden falling up and down stairs, off bicycles, off podiums, losing complete track of what he was saying in the middle of speeches, and now suddenly freezing in his tracks with his arms extended, looking like an automaton?

Well, according to MSNBC, those are not real. They are deep fakes courtesy of the Russians!

Read more about it here.

Turning Point: The Bomb and the Cold War

A 9-part documentary series on Netflix
65 to 80 min. per episode
Directed by Brian Knappenberger
Released March 12, 2024

There is nothing remarkable about this series about – well, the title says it.

It spans from the development of the atomic bomb to the proliferation of nuclear weapons, including a good, succinct, exploration of the collapse of the Soviet Union, the rise of Vladimir Putin, and the Russian invasion of Ukraine.

Like most good documentaries of its kind, Turning Point tells its story with a wealth of old videos and photos and with interviews of historians, military experts, and technical experts – all cut and spliced to make it comprehensible and compelling.

It is sober and straightforward. And had I the time, I could have binge-watched the whole series in one seating.

There were several things about this modest (and as far as I know, unheralded) documentary that I especially liked.

1. It was – or at least it felt to me – largely objective and unbiased. It was only until the very end, when it was covering Putin and the events leading to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, that I felt it tilt a little too favorably towards Ukraine. But that bias was light. I don’t think it would ruin the series for anyone on either side of that debate.

2. It managed to provide a surprising amount of relevant and interesting facts about not just the chronology, the strategies, the actions, and the motivations of the Cold War, but also insights into many of the influential people that decided to begin the war and kept it going for so long.

3. Quite rightly, I think, it demonstrated that, contrary to popular myth, the Cold War didn’t end when the Berlin Wall was taken down. It’s alive and well now.

If you have prejudices or preconceived beliefs about either the use of the atom bomb or the Cold War, you should definitely put aside the time to watch Turning Point. It will keep you interested. It will give you facts you didn’t know. And it may even change your perspective a bit.

Critical Reception 

Reviews were mostly positive. But I was surprised to see that Noah Rothman, the critic for the National Review, called it “revisionist history” and said it was “the worst Cold War documentary ever made.” You can read his review here.

I’m hardly an authority on the subject, so you may agree with him.

You can watch the entire series on Netflix and judge for yourself. If you do, tell me what you think.

Here’s the trailer.

Five Quick Bites 

* Fun and Interesting. The greatest prank in academic history. Click here.

* Interesting. Rachel Maddow doesn’t understand the first thing about how our Constitution was formed. Click here.

* Interesting. A whole lot that you didn’t know about the filming of Breakfast at Tiffany’s. Click here.

* Interesting. Iran? Ireland? Persia? What’s in a name? Click here.

* Fun and Interesting. Internet justice puts a scumbag in jail. Click here.

From GB: “Thought you’d find this interesting.”

Illustrated Hints for Health and Strength for Busy People – an old-time strongman’s 15-minute morning routine – published by the author in 1901. Check it out here.”

My Response: Thanks, GB! I thought it was great. I normally work out hard for at least an hour a day, six days a week. But whenever possible, I like to add a second, 15-minute routine to complement the main workout and to restore my energy. Interestingly, my routine has many of the same elements as his. I’m going to give it a try.