What’s FTC Chairwoman Lina Khan Really Up To?

Lina Khan 

The FTC is going after OpenAI’s ChatGPT by “investigating” whether the technology may be “harming people” by publishing false information about them.

In a July 13 press release accompanying a civil subpoena, the FTC said it will find out if OpenAI has “engaged in unfair or deceptive practices relating to risks of harm to consumers, including reputational harm.”

As someone that doesn’t take government press releases as gospel, I’m suspicious.

First, since when does the FTC investigate possible future harm-doing? Its job is to investigate current and prosecute current wrongdoings. And that only when there is ample factual evidence of wrongdoing.

Second, the FTC is not in the business of policing speech. Its bailiwick is “trade,” as in the Federal Trade Commission.

Third, even if the FTC had a legitimate reason to investigate and prosecute speech, ChatGPT is not a conveyor of speech – in the sense of ideas and opinions – the way that the media (newspapers, magazines, TV, the internet, etc.) is. It is not – at least at the moment – a being with agency. Like any other tool, a screwdriver, for instance, ChatGPT can be used for all sorts of useful purposes. But it can also be used to hurt people.

Investigating the company behind ChatGPT for speech concerns is like investigating Stanley or Craftsman to determine if screwdrivers could possibly be used to stab someone to death. Doh!

The FTC surely knows this. So why is it doing it?

I see the current excuse – protecting individuals from libel or slander – as patently false. What the government is doing here, I suspect, is looking to get the AI industry under its thumb in any and every way it can, before AI advances to the next level and the government can’t control it anymore.

I don’t think the FTC, or the Biden administration, has any idea of what sort of threat AI is to them, but they want to figure it out. Beginning the investigation with the FTC and a concern that vague is a good, low-key way of moving forward.

I haven’t been using ChatGPT, but I keep promising myself that I will get acquainted with it. It’s already impressive, and it will be getting a major upgrade soon, as the company has just struck a deal with the Associated Press to access the 177-year-old news organization’s text archives. Click here.

 

The Government’s Digital Dollar Plan Is Moving Apace 

Alex Mashinsky 

Alex Mashinsky, the founder of Celsius Network, a now-defunct crypto exchange, was arrested last week in NYC and charged with seven federal crimes, including securities fraud, commodities fraud, and market manipulation. In the last three months, the government has gone after at least one major cryptocurrency business a week. The week of June 10, for example, it was Binance and Coinbase.

What, if anything, is going on?

One thing is that some of these companies are engaged in fraud and federal regulators are doing their jobs. Another thing – and this I can’t prove – is what I suggested in the June 8, 2022 issue. It is just one more step of a plan that is already well underway: replacing the paper dollar with a digital dollar, and then using the digital dollar to monitor and control just about everything every single American does or says.

For more on this, click here.

 

Huge Return on Tiny Collectible 

This is the sort of story that inspires millions of amateur collectors to spend weekends browsing thrift stores and garage sales. Here you have a nicely painted but otherwise undistinguished little vase that was bought for $3.30 and later sold at auction for $11,800.

In today’s interconnected world, this is a rare phenomenon, but it’s still fun to read about, if you fancy this sort of thing. Click here.

 

School Massacres… Where? 

The US has led the world in school massacres for as long as I can remember. But now I’m seeing reports of school killings in Europe. And just the other day, I read about six people (including three children) stabbed to death in a kindergarten in southeastern China’s Guangdong province. According to The Hustle, the massacre was one of several similar incidents. At least 17 knife attacks in schools have occurred in China since 2010.

Gun-related murders are extremely rare in China because guns are almost impossible to get. In China, apparently, knives are the mass murderer’s weapon of choice.

Continue Reading

Factotum 

By Charles Bukowski

208 pages

Originally published Jan. 1, 1975

Factotum was one of three books the Mules read for our mid-July meeting at the Cigar Club. A semi-autobiographical novel about a wannabe writer and drunk, it is outside of the sorts of books our members enjoy reading, so I was surprised by the recommendation.

The Plot 

Henry Chinaski roams around from one fleabag hotel and city to another, barely understanding what is going on while attempting to support himself through mindless, poorly paid jobs. (Chinaski is Bukowski’s alter-ego. The character appears in five of his novels.)

There’s lots of drinking, smoking, and foul language, but there is virtually no forward movement among the characters. Still, I would recommend this book to anyone that hasn’t read Bukowski and to anyone that wanted to understand American prose in modern times.

What I Liked About It 

Bukowski’s prose. I’m a big fan of Hemingway. And I liked the way Bukowski takes Hem’s terseness and directness even farther… probably as far as prose can go while still retaining some poetic vibration.

What I Didn’t Like So Much 

Having to vicariously live the life of Henry Chinaski. This isn’t a fault of the story. Nor of Bukowski’s imagination. He wants the reader to live in that depressing, boring, unredeemable world in order to show him the little glints of light. But it’s viscerally uncomfortable.

About Charles Bukowski 

Charles Bukowski (1920-1994) 

Charles Bukowski was born in Germany. When he was three, the family moved to the US.

As a struggling writer, he worked a wide range of jobs, including dishwasher, truck driver and loader, mail carrier, guard, gas station attendant, stock boy, warehouse worker, shipping clerk, post office clerk, parking lot attendant, Red Cross orderly, and elevator operator. He also worked in a dog biscuit factory, a slaughterhouse, a cake and cookie factory, and he hung posters in New York City subways.

His writing often featured a depraved metropolitan environment, downtrodden members of American society, direct language, violence, and sexual imagery. His first book of poetry was published in 1959. He went on to publish more than forty-five books of poetry and prose. (Source: Poets.org)

Continue Reading

Charles Bukowski on Writing 

* “Poetry is what happens when nothing else can.”

* “If I stop writing, then I am dead. And that’s the only way I’ll stop: dead.”

* “It’s better to do a dull thing with style than a dangerous thing without it.”

Continue Reading

Matt Dillon and Marisa Tomei 

Factotum 

Adapted from the book by Charles Bukowski

Directed by Bent Hamer

Starring Matt Dillon, Marisa Tomei, and Lili Taylor

Released Aug. 18, 2006 (US)

Factotum is a good but not great movie. There are many things to recommend it, including the camera work and the settings. But I think what I liked best about watching it so many years after it first came out was Matt Dillon’s portrayal of Henry Chinaski. (Dillon was about 40 at the time.) It felt exactly right. It might have been Dillon’s best performance ever. I also thought that Lili Taylor was excellent in the role of Henry’s main squeeze.

What I didn’t like so much…

The plot moved along pretty well in the book, but it dragged in the movie. I think the reason for that is that the screenwriters (Bent Hamer and Jim Stark) took liberties with Bukowski’s story (e.g., cutting some scenes, then dropping in transitional sections in an effort to help with continuity) that had the effect of slowing everything down. They also failed to capture the dark humor in the book.

I would recommend Factotum to Bukowski fans. But I would warn them not to watch it with huge expectations.

Critical Reception 

* “At times, the picture recalls Jim Jarmusch at his very best, with all the self-indulgent parts cut out.” (Eleanor Ringel Cater, Atlanta Journal-Constitution)

* “Factotum, for all its grim grind, is funny-serious, and smart-stupid.” (Marc Savlov, Austin Chronicle)

* “An aimless movie about an aimless man is still an aimless movie.” (Tom Long, Detroit News)

You can watch the trailer here.

Continue Reading

A factotum (fak-TOW-tum) – Latin for “do everything” – is an employee or official that has many different responsibilities; a handyman or jack-of-all trades hired to do all sorts of work around the house.

Continue Reading

Sure, These May Be Cherry-Picked, but Still… 

Another amusing episode of “How Dumb Are Young People Today.” I love the last bit, where the young woman could rattle off the names of all the Kardashians but couldn’t name the capital of the US!

Click here.

Continue Reading

A Look Back:

The Power of Wit

On Tuesday, I shared an excerpt from an essay I wrote in 2008 about the state of America – an essay that is still disturbingly relevant. Today, I’m switching gears with a piece that I was happy to read again, because it is about a way of moving through life with less stress and more success. It’s not something I was ever very good at. And I can’t say that I’ve gotten better in the last 13 years. But it’s nonetheless good advice.

As W. Somerset Maugham once said, “I can imagine no more comfortable frame of mind for the conduct of life than a humorous resignation.”

Written for Early to Rise, April 12, 2010 

My friend B is a very affable guy. He always seems happy to see you. He asks about your family, work, and friends. He is happy to talk about his life, too, if you ask him. And when he does, it is always positive and amusing.

This combination of congeniality and wit is used to make quick connections with customers, employees, and colleagues. The unsaid theme of his humor is that the business you are doing with him is not all that serious. Let’s make a deal, he seems to be saying, but let’s make it fun.

If you tell B that you think the price of a particular item is high, he won’t argue the point. He’ll make a joke of it. “For someone with your money,” he might say, “it is chicken feed!” If you ask him if he can deliver it on Friday, he’ll say, “Friday of what month?”

In doing business with B, you can never forget that fighting or fretting about most things simply doesn’t make sense. There are more important things to worry about.

But he doesn’t shy away from difficult discussions. He seeks them out. He seems to know that he has the power to straighten out problems quickly using his finely tuned sense of humor.

He does what George Bernard Shaw said he always tried to do: “Take the utmost trouble to find the right thing to say, and then say it with the upmost levity.”

This is very powerful, when you think about. Usually, when confronted with a difficult or awkward situation, we feel the prudent thing is to say nothing. But saying nothing conveys nothing. The fraud is not unmasked. The foolishness is not sanctioned. The reprobate is not reproached.

To some, humor is synonymous with joking or punning. But nothing could be further from the truth.

Humor – true humor – requires intelligence and draws from an appreciation for the absurdity of life.

Humor is funny. Joking is, at best, amusing. And punning? Spare me.

A joke is a remark or anecdote that is memorized and retold for the amusement of others. To be a jokester, you need only have enough memory to recount something you heard.

A pun is a very obvious play on words. It requires no wit. In fact, it suggests the lack of it. A punster’s only attribute is a remarkable lack of embarrassment. A punster is willing to verbalize inanities that others have the sense to keep to themselves.

By contrast, a witty person shows himself to be smart and positive, but also someone who understands the pathos of life. As Mark Twain said, “the secret source of humor is not joy but sorrow.”

Humorless people inevitably become upset when they encounter obstacles or setbacks. They are like wagons without springs, as Henry Ward Beecher said, “jolted by every pebble in the road.”

But if you have wit in your head and lightness in your heart you can say the correct thing to anyone at any time and get away with it. With humor, you can deal with disappointments and surprises with equanimity and even optimism.

Continue Reading

The Madness of Crowds: Gender, Race and Identity 

By Douglas Murray

288 pages

Originally published Sept. 17, 2019

I’ve heard Douglas Murray on the BBC. I’ve seen him in a few debates. And I’ve had The Madness of Crowds recommended to me by friends and colleagues. But until last week, I didn’t realize that Murray was the author. It was time to check it out. So, I ordered it on my audio app and began listening.

I’ve read (listened to) about half of it so far, and I’m feeling like it’s a well-spent investment of time. The Madness of Crowds is about, among other things, some of the extreme ideas that leftists are promoting about gender and sex. And yet, in Chapter One, I learned that Douglas Murray is a homosexual.

That has given his book an extra layer of interest for me. I want to find out how he deals with the gap between his political and social conservatism and the expectations that leftists have of him as a gay man.

It’s basically the same challenge that Black conservatives have when they talk about race or any topic that has racial associations, which is basically every topic today.

The Madness of Crowds is divided into four main sections, each a look at an identity group: Gay, Women, Race, and Trans. Murray makes a strong case that contemporary ideas about and attitudes towards each group have not been good – either for the groups themselves or for the community at large. He warns that the current practices of vitriol, cancellation, doxing (a form of cyberbullying), and other forms of and ideological persecution are fueled by identity politics. And they are growing fast. In a world gone mad with tribalism, he says, and with each tribe getting its information and inspiration from different sources, we must relearn how to accept and forgive.

Douglas Murray is smart and funny in a way that I associate with my old-fashioned view of things. His arguments are, to my mind, solid. But they are delivered, as one critic put it, with such lively, razor-sharp prose that I would want to believe them even if I didn’t.

Critical Reception 

The Madness of Crowds was a bestseller and “book of the year” for The Times and The Sunday Times in the UK, but it received varying reviews from critics.

Tim Stanley in The Daily Telegraph praised the book, calling Murray “a superbly perceptive guide through the age of the social justice warrior.” Katie Law in the Evening Standard said that Murray “tackled another necessary and provocative subject with wit and bravery.” Writing for the Financial Times, Eric Kaufmann said that he “performs a great service in exposing the excesses of the left-modernist faith.”

Conversely, William Davies in The Guardian was highly critical, describing the book as “the bizarre fantasies of a rightwing provocateur, blind to oppression.” And in The Times Literary Supplement, Terry Eagleton likened it to “a history of conservatism which views it almost entirely through the lens of upper-class louts smashing up Oxford restaurants.”

About Douglas Murray 

Douglas Kear Murray is a British author and political commentator. He has been a contributor to The Spectator since 2000 and has been Associate Editor at the magazine since 2012. He published his first book, a biography of Lord Alfred Douglas (the lover of Oscar Wilde), at the age of 19, while he was an undergraduate at Oxford. Since then, he has published three more books on politics, history, and current affairs, including the award-winning bestseller The Strange Death of Europe: Immigration, Identity, Islam.

Here’s a clip of him talking about the connection between post-modern theory and woke thinking today.

Continue Reading

The Current State of the Art Market

Artworks going for $20 million plus comprised half of the art sold at auction between 2018 and 2022. This Botticelli, for example, sold for $92.2 million at Sotheby’s in London in 2021. Click here.

Auctions of modern and contemporary art continue to post record-breaking sales. When it comes to Old Masters, there are some record prices here and there. But at a recent auction at Sotheby’s, a third of the Old Master lots were left unsold, including a pair of small views of Venice by Canaletto, made towards the end of the 1720s. They were purchased for 2.1 million pounds (about $2.7 million), well under the guaranteed low estimate. Click here.

Continue Reading