The COVID Response. What We Got Wrong.

 New Questions, New Answers 

As some readers have noticed, I’ve been devoting an increasing amount of space to all the misinformation we were sold about COVID. That’s not because my interest level has increased. It’s because – now that the Congress is actually investigating what we were told vs. what happened – new discrepancies being revealed every day.

There is much more coming out than I could possibly follow in a few hundred words, twice a week. So, I’m going to cover several items in each issue over the next several weeks. Then I’ll publish one long bonus issue that summarizes everything.

In the meantime, here is some of what’s been going on…

* The Origin Debate: It is now all but confirmed that COVID-19 originated in the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China, where they were conducting gain-of-function research on the virus. And it is becoming clear that much of the funding for this research came from the US. 

Rep. Brad Wenstrup (R-Ohio), chairman of the Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic, and Rep. James Comer (R-KY), chairman of the House Committee on Oversight and Accountability, are leading the investigation. They are also seeking testimony and information from Peter Daszak, president of EcoHealth Alliance; Avril Haines, director of National Intelligence; Dr. Francis Collins, acting science adviser to President Joe Biden; and Xavier Becerra, secretary of Health and Human Services. Click here.

* The WHO: Despite all the misinformation that came out of the WHO, member states are negotiating an accord that will give the WHO centralized authority in future pandemics. Republican senators are pushing back. 

The draft accord, which would be “legally binding” on all 194 member nations, gives the WHO the authority to declare pandemics and submits member countries to “the central role of the WHO as the directing and coordinating authority on international health work” once a pandemic is declared. Click here for Meryl Nass’s explanation of the key points.

This isn’t just stupidity, it’s evil. Almost every recommendation the WHO made in response to the pandemic was not just wrong. It was stupidly and completely wrong. The CDC and their Deep State supporters got behind those damaging stupidities to get Joe Biden elected. That makes sense to me. But why would they want to continue to do more harm by mandating that future WHO recommendations become US law? Click here and here.

* The Vaccine Risks: They knew. Why didn’t they tell us? 

Despite the now irrefutable evidence that COVID vaccines don’t work but do have potentially dire side effects, the CDC continues to recommend that everyone get the shots. Click here.

Contrary to what the mainstream press has been telling us, it’s now clear that the CDC knew about the cardio-vascular risks of the mRNA vaccines more than two years ago.

In December 2020, the CDC launched a service called V-Safe, which listed adverse reactions to the mRNA COVID vaccines. Included in that list were such symptoms as fever, chills, and pain. But some adverse reactions – e.g., pericarditis, myocarditis, transverse militis, and seizures – which are now being included in CDC literature, were not included.

You could theorize that the CDC did not include these scarier reactions to the vaccines because they didn’t know about them then. But that isn’t true. In October, two months before the V-Safe list was released, the CDC gave a presentation of “adverse effects of special interest.” And it included – yes – pericarditis, myocarditis, transverse militis, and seizures.

Click here for a short video about how the mRNA vaccines got FDA emergency use authorization, despite the fact that the studies said the risk of serious adverse events was greater than the reduction of hospitalization risk.

You can expect many more “shocking” revelations in the coming weeks and months.

The COVID Response. What We Got Wrong.

The Final Word on Wearing Masks

A friend of mine, whose spouse has COVID, has been told by his daughter that if he wants to see his granddaughter, he must wear a mask. Another friend insists that anyone who may have been near this woman, must mask up. Talking about this to K and her sister G last night, I said something like, “But everyone knows that masks don’t work.”

And then I got an earful.

“Save your conspiracy theories for your blog,” they told me.

So here I am.

I wrote about the ineffectiveness of masks in the Dec. 20 issue I provided further proof Feb. 10.At that time, I felt that the studies I cited were more than enough to embarrass the CDC, the Biden administration, and the media for promoting them as effective safeguards for so long. Instead, they’ve been walking back their misinformation, one step at a time.

Their narrative continues to be: “We were just reporting the science as we knew it then.”

Which is a bald-faced lie. The data and the analytics have been there since day one. And now, a newly released report – the most rigorous and extensive review of the scientific literature on masks – concludes that there was never any scientific evidence that masks reduced the spread of COVID. Neither surgical masks nor N-95s. Not even a little.

Click here.

If you don’t have time to hit the link and read the report, at least take a look at the following graph. It tracks the results of the experiment that occurred across the US in the first two years of the pandemic, when mask mandates were imposed and lifted at various times in 39 states.

The black line shows the weekly rate of COVID cases in states with mask mandates that week. The orange line shows the rate in states without mandates.

As you can see, the trajectories are virtually identical. And if you add up all those numbers, the cumulative rates of COVID cases are virtually identical, too. So are the cumulative rates of COVID mortality. (The mortality rate is actually a little lower in the states without mask mandates!)