Making Sense of the State of the Union Address 

Did you listen to Biden’s State of the Union address? Did you hear what he said about his economic priorities?

He said he was going to make America great again by opening oil and gas exploration, reducing the budget deficit, and mandating “Made in America” for manufactured goods.

Huh? Aren’t those Donald Trump’s talking points!

It was such a startling departure from the Democratic party’s prior positions that I found myself momentarily worried for Biden. Worried that he would be harshly called out the next day by both the right- and the left-leaning media.

But no. His pivot to an America-first economic agenda was barely mentioned by the mainstream press. And when it was, the attitude was supportive.

None of my liberal friends mentioned it. Perhaps because they didn’t watch the speech. Not many people did. (It drew an estimated 27.3 million viewers, less than 10% of the population, and the lowest for a SOTU in at least 30 years.)

What happened? Here’s my take:

That Was Then 

Prior to the 2020 election, polls showed that the number-one concern of US voters was COVID-19. This was, as you would expect, truer for Democrats than for Republicans. But it was enough of a concern for all Americans that it turned out to be the tipping point that gave the presidency to Joe Biden.

If you remember, Trump’s campaign was all about urban violence, which had spiked nationwide, but especially in the large, Democratic-run cities. Biden’s was all about the threat posed by the “unmasked” and the “unvaccinated.”

The Biden strategy, as it turned out, was the stronger one. The Trump haters and the Trump lovers were never going to be swayed. But tens of millions of voters were in the middle. And as the summer ended and fall began, fear of the pandemic stayed strong, while fear of urban crime ebbed enough to put Biden in office.

This Is Now 

Since then, things have changed. Significantly.

Hardly anyone is afraid of COVID any more. The facts are being gradually released. COVID was and is a serious threat to a small portion of the population: those that were/are over 65, overweight, and suffering from “comorbidities” like diabetes. For the rest, the danger of COVID was about the same as the regular flu.

Meanwhile, prices of almost everything began to edge up slightly in 2020. They rose 4.5% in 2021, then climbed as high as 8.5% in August of 2022. Instead of acknowledging this, Biden’s advisors were doing everything they could to deny it – calling it a hoax, then temporary, then blaming it on Putin, then on the gas stations, etc.

That strategy didn’t work. Ordinary earners could feel the reality of inflation every time they went shopping or filled their gas tanks. The trillion-plus dollars in COVID relief that the government had spread around a year or so earlier was being spent down. Savings were disappearing. Money was getting tight.

So, regardless of what voters’ political opinions might have been, they began to worry about the economy. That has become increasingly clear from polling.

A Gallup Poll released last week reported that half of those asked said they were worse off economically than they were this time last year. Only 35 percent said they were better off. (Since Gallup first asked this question in 1976, it has been rare for half or more of Americans to say they are worse off. The only other times it happened were during the Great Recession era of 2008 and 2009.)

And economic concerns dominated the top 10 spots of a just-released poll by Pew Research that ranked Americans’ greatest fears. (Also noteworthy: COVID wasn’t even in the top 20. It was outranked not only by economic concerns but by social fears that are traditionally promoted by right-leaning politicians and media, such as crime, terrorism – foreign, not domestic – and immigration.)

Given these drastically changing sentiments among voters, had I written Biden’s State of the Union speech, I’d have crammed it full of Trump talking points and promises to win back the undecided voters. And that, by gosh, is exactly what his speechwriter did!

For more on this from Gallup, go here.

And for more from Pew Research, go here.

Continue Reading

Bits and Pieces 

From National Geographic: Nature’s Design for Having Babies 

How big an issue is age in predicting fertility in women? And what should women do if they hear “the clock ticking”?

Here’s a good article that answers those questions.

The Future of the Universe 

If you are worried about humanity disappearing in a hundred years because of atomic war or climate change, this may make you feel better. Populations may thrive and die. Planets may come and go. But the universe? Click here for a bracing perspective.

The World’s Most Repressive Countries 

When it comes to women’s rights, the most repressive countries in the world are Islamic. No surprise there. But you might be shocked to learn that when it comes to free speech, the most repressive countries include Canada, England, Australia, and New Zealand!

There are many studies that have rated the right to free speech by country. I’ve looked at several, and they were surprisingly consistent.

Here’s an example of repression that I came across last week.

Continue Reading

Tár 

Directed by Todd Field

Starring Cate Blanchett

Released in theaters (US) Oct. 7, 2022

Available on many streaming services, including Amazon Prime

K and I have been trying to watch as many of the nominated films as possible before the Academy Awards are aired. Tárwas one of them. So was The Fabelmans, which I’ll review on Friday.

Tár is a psychological drama about a passionate and demanding woman, the conductor of perhaps the most esteemed symphony in the world.

It is a movie about the MeToo movement, taking on one of its principal arguments: that any time a boss has sex with an employee, it is, by definition, abuse, because of the difference in power. But in Tár, the abuser is a woman. And that allows the viewer to think about the issue of sexual misconduct in the workplace with fewer prejudices.

What I Liked About It 

* The treatment of the underlying theme.

* The film’s horizontality. It gave me insight into the world of symphony music, a world I knew almost nothing about. It helped me understand the important role of conductors. (Apparently, they do a lot more than control the tempo.) I especially liked the protagonist’s theory that the conductor’s job is to “serve the composer.”

* Cate Blanchette’s performance. At first, I thought she was overdoing it. But finally, she won me over.

* The score. (When a score is comprised of some of the greatest music ever written, how could anyone not like it?)

What I Didn’t Like 

* Some of the dialogue, particularly when Blanchette’s character is speaking to other illuminati, seemed unnecessarily pretentious.

* The subject matter is emotionally difficult. Of course, it is. But that doesn’t obviate the fact that it saps the energy from any sensitive viewer.

Critical Reception 

Tár got a ton of positive reviews and won loads of rewards. It is, not surprisingly, a contender for Best Film at the Oscars this year. It wouldn’t be my top choice, but it’s a good choice. I might, though, vote for Cate Blanchette for Best Actress. And given the theme and how much time the camera is on her, she does seem like a shoe-in.

You can watch the trailer here.

Continue Reading

The COVID Response. What We Got Wrong.

 Part XIII: The Backtracking Speeds Up 

Almost every week since I began writing this series, there has been some revelation in the mainstream media about what the CDC got wrong about COVID. None of them admits to being a part of the three-year-long campaign of misinformation and downright lies. Instead, they report on the new revelations as if they are news.

For anyone like me that’s been following the story since the beginning, the naïveté of their posture is evident. The “facts” that were so widely reported and defended throughout the lockdown were either suspicious or evidently illogical and/or impossible back then. The media didn’t inquire about them because they didn’t want to. They were supporting a political narrative that needed false facts. And so began a partnership between the CDC, the left-leaning pols, and the reporters that promoted them.

What’s New 

What’s new this week is that Fauci is admitting what he, his health tsars, the CDC, Pfizer, and Moderna knew all along: The vaccines didn’t work. They didn’t stop the spread of the virus.

He is among a growing number of officials acknowledging that the vaccines were never even tested for efficacy. There wasn’t time. The CDC went ahead and approved them for use in the market. And the US government took this one step further by mandating their use, without any idea of the complications they would cause.

“Vaccines against both COVID-19 and influenza have deficiencies,” Dr. Fauci and top officials of the NIH said in a paper published last week. Even worse, they said, the vaccines are “suboptimal” and are no better at stopping COVID than the ordinary flu vaccines that we’ve been getting for decades.

“With the imperfections of these vaccines, it seems a public health imperative to aggressively pursue better vaccines and vaccination strategies,” they added later, before acknowledging that “none of the predominantly mucosal respiratory viruses,” such as COVID-19, “have ever been effectively controlled by vaccines.”

“That is just an amazing admission,” said David Wiseman, a former Johnson & Johnson scientist, last week.

“Numerous federal officials are quietly trying to walk back their lies and obfuscations from earlier in the pandemic,” Dr. Meryl Nass, an expert on vaccines, recently told The Epoch Times.

Continue Reading

A Fascinating Story About Art Forgery

Ever since I began to forge the paintings of modern masters to hang in my first-bought house in 1985, I’ve been interested in reading about more accomplished forgers. Here is a story I came across recently about a colorful couple that earned a fortune by selling their fake wares, went to jail, and then came out with a clever business plan to get rich again.
Continue Reading

The Difference Between Values and Morals 

I found this in a recent issue of Classical Wisdom. It’s a reader’s response to an article about “conscience.” Although values and morals have their own individual meanings, I thought he did a good job of making a simple and useful distinction between them.

“Our ‘values’ are created in our early middle adolescence – 12-16. Our ‘morals’ alter with time and place, our ‘values’ never change. Indeed, we go to the grave with our values. If you cross your values, the internal pain is not worth the thought and or deed.”

Continue Reading