From Russia with Love 

Directed by Terence Young

Starring Sean Connery

Premiered in London Oct. 10, 1963

Released in US theaters May 27, 1964

Currently available on many streaming services

The Mules opted to read two books in November: Ian Fleming’s From Russia with Love and The World Is Not Enough.

The latter is a biography of Fleming by Oliver Buckton, who happens to be a professor at a local university and a friend of SL, one of the founders of The Mules. It was fascinating. But I’m not going to review it here and now. Today, I want to review From Russia with Love, the book and the movie.

From Russia with Love was Fleming’s fourth or fifth book, but it was my first James Bond. Most of the other Mules had read the Bond novels when they were young. I read less than a half-dozen books before I went off to college. Fleming’s were not among them.

I have seen almost all the Bond movies, though. And because my exposure to 007 was through those movies, I was surprised to be introduced to a very different character in this novel. He was much less amazing and more human. That made him more complex and, therefore, more interesting. But I must admit, I was a little disappointed by how much less manly he was. You may have a different feeling.

What most surprised me was the way the story was written. The Bond movie plots are exciting and suspenseful and reasonably packed with action. That’s what I expected when I read From Russia with Love. But that’s not what I got. Most of the action is interior – occurring in the mind of the protagonist in the form of perceptions, memories, worries, etc.

Likewise, in the movies, James Bond is the quintessential action hero. He faces all the challenges and resolves all the problems. In the book, he is more of a modern anti-hero. Bad things happen to him. And he has all he can do to survive them.

Don’t let these complaints keep you from reading Ian Fleming. He is a superb writer. And here’s why I say that. With my ADD, I’ve never been a fan of long literary descriptions. I tend to lose interest after just a few sentences. In From Russia with Love, a significant portion of the text is given to description. Long paragraphs describing places and faces. But I was never bored with them. On the contrary, I was smitten. I recommend this book to anyone that enjoys the literary side of storytelling.

Until I came across this in Letters of Note, I had no idea that Kurt Vonnegut was a prisoner of war. This letter to his family explains a lot about his view of war and the world, as expressed in his novels.

To read the entire letter, click here.

“I hope you get great satisfaction in knowing that your book [Ready, Fire, Aim] continues to guide the way and help thousands of people like me every year!” – RC

“I am reaching out to ask if there is any way to work with you as a mentor? I admire your story and what you have built. I am 23 years old and started my first company about six years ago.” – JJ

My Response: I appreciate the question, JJ. I think it’s smart for someone in your position – young but already moving in the fast lane – to seek out mentors.

Probably because of the many books I’ve written about business and wealth building over the years, I get requests like yours several times a month. It’s flattering to be appreciated, but I always wonder: Do these people think I’m retired and spending my days sitting on a porch somewhere? I am 72, but I’m still working 60+ hours a week on a half-dozen businesses and charities that need my attention.

So, the answer is no. But I can’t fault you for asking. What I’d recommend for someone like you (young and already a business owner) would be to join a mastermind group of business owners, of which there are many to choose from. I’ve been a guest speaker at several of those meetings and have been impressed with how they work. By putting together entrepreneurs of different ages, and with different levels of experience, and from different industries, these groups give you a rich base of wisdom to test your ideas and go to for advice.

Julie Nolke is a Canadian comedian, actress, writer, and YouTuber. I discovered her online while searching for comic relief during the COVID lockdown She is very talented, as you can see from this clip of her audition tape for SNL…

After the Storm

Late Wednesday afternoon, one of the Mules asked me if we were still planning to have our book club meeting at the cigar club, as planned. I replied, “Why wouldn’t we?”

He said, “Because of the storm.”

I said, “Oh, that. When is that supposed to hit?”

He said, “Tonight.”

I said, “Well, the cigar club is basically a cement bunker filled with booze. I’m going. So is Frank, the bartender. And Olio, the restaurant down the street, is delivering the food.”

He said, “I’ll be there.”

It was raining when the meeting began at six. And it was raining when it ended at ten. There were apparently gusts of wind here and there, but we never noticed them. When I went to bed, it had stopped raining. I woke around two in the morning and looked outside onto the beach. It was beautiful and calm.

Thursday morning, it was bright and sunny.

This is what happens 9 out of 10 times that we are alerted to an impending hurricane. That’s why it’s difficult for long-term Floridians to put much stock in weather reports, especially urgent ones. And that’s why we get a kick out of coverage like this:

What Are My Thoughts? 

JS, my editor, thought I should write something about the election results. So, I’ve been thinking about what I think and, so far, I don’t have any thoughts worth writing about. But I do have a feeling about the results. On both a state and a federal level, I feel a bit safer about the future than I felt a week ago. With more of a balance in the House (and maybe the Senate), there should be a slightly better chance that Congress will do an overall better job by passing fewer laws and spending less money and generally reducing their power and presence. Okay. Maybe that’s optimistic. Still, as Hem said, isn’t it pretty to think so?

Is Google Influencing Elections? 

Speaking of elections, I ran across this earlier this week: the assertion that Google has been using its algorithms to influence elections. It seems like a “conspiracy theory,” but the source checks out. And I wasn’t able to find anything to refute it. Could it be true? And if true, isn’t this a huge story?

Click here to judge for yourself.

Would You Ask This Question? If Asked, Could You Answer It? 

If I were in charge, nobody would be allowed to become an employee until he/she had spent some time running a business. And nobody would be allowed to run a business until he/she had spent some time as an employee.

Also, nobody would be allowed to voice an opinion about socialism unless they had lived in a socialist economy. And nobody would be allowed to say anything about capitalism unless they had lived in a capitalist country.

I know. That is illogical. Still, it’s how things should be.

I’m saying this in response to the video below. Here, you have a bright kid from a good university asking Milton Friedman what he believes is a “gotcha” question, only to learn how dumb a question it is.

It is evident that the hosts are not aware of these simple business measurement tactics. Don Lemon’s comment about Flay’s observation that we are in a bad economy (“They say we are…”) is almost mind numbing in its dumbness.

What I Believe: About Gun Control

I think everyone should have the right to own a gun. Or guns. But I also believe in gun control. I can’t, for the life of me, understand the arguments against, at the very least, banning assault weapons.

The best argument in favor of assault weapons is a political and theoretical one. It’s based on the second amendment, which states that “the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” But the primary rationale for the second amendment was not for protection against robbery or personal assault. It was for protection against tyranny. Our founding fathers had risked their lives defending America from tyranny, in large part with state militias. They recognized that the government they were establishing could one day devolve into tyranny. To prevent that, they wanted citizens to be armed.

So, if that was the intention, and we want to hold fast to the intention, it’s difficult to argue with the right for all Americans not just to be armed, but to be armed to the hilt so they could militia-up and fight governmental tyranny.

But as a pragmatist, I can’t see that playing out in the real world.

Tyranny is a real threat. And we should be on guard against it. I just don’t think the answer is a deluge of automatic weapons.

That’s where my thinking is now. And I would be wasting your reading time if that was all I had to say on the subject. But, in researching assault weapons, I discovered something interesting. It’s something you may not know.

I assumed that assault weapons were responsible for most of the homicides in America. It turns out, that’s not true.

According to FBI data, handguns are the weapons of choice for most killers in this country. In every one of the past 20 years, the overwhelming majority of murders involved handguns. And an NIH study confirmed that, depending on the year, assault rifles accounted for between 2% and 12% of all homicides.

In the chart below, you can see that, in this particular year, automatic handguns and rifles were used in 329 murders, or about 2% of the total.

Conclusion: This is not to say that assault weapons are not a problem. When it comes to mass shootings, they are, indeed, the weapon of choice. Assault weapons are involved in more than 80% of mass killings, according to FBI data. (Interesting: The greatest mass killer in American history must certainly be Charles Cullen – i.e., The Good Nurse. And he didn’t use a weapon of any kind.) Given my thoughts on applying the death penalty to serial killers and mass murderers (see what I said about capital punishment in Tuesday’s issue), logic compels me to favor significant restrictions, including serious psychological screening, for owning assault weapons.

“There is a lot of talk now about metal detectors and gun control. Both are good things. But they are no more a solution than forks and spoons are a solution to world hunger.” – Anna Quindlen