About the Inflation Reduction Act 

What a wonderfully Orwellian world we live in. Congress has just passed a bill called the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) that, as far as I can tell, is practically designed to increase inflation.

Its supporters claim that, in addition to reducing inflation, it will increase GDP by increasing taxes and adding regulations and doubling the size of the IRS. Again, these are policies that are almost certain to lower GDP.

The bill won’t raise taxes – we were assured – on anyone making less than $400,000 a year. But that claim has already been refuted by the government’s own budgetary office.

I’ll talk more about this in future issues as we see how the provisions of this bill take hold in the economy. But for the moment, I want to highlight what I thought was the oddest aspect of the advertising campaign for the bill’s passage: its specificity.

As reported by Yahoo!News:

“The IRA provisions could also generate enormous public health and jobs benefits” [according to a study from the think tank Energy Innovations]. In addition to preventing between 3,700 and 3,900 premature deaths from air pollution in 2030, Energy Innovation found it would lead to a net increase of up to 1.5 million jobs in 2030 and increase the United States’ gross domestic product by 0.84% to 0.88% in 2030.

I believe Bill Bonner had it right when he said this in the August 4 edition of Bonner Private Research:

“This grab bag of boondoggles will increase US GDP by 0.84% eight years from now? It will save 3,700 to 3,900 lives? Really? The technocratic precision is breathtakingly absurd. There is no way on Earth to predict the effect of this collection of robbery, flimflam and jackassery on our $24 trillion economy… eight years in the future. And to two decimal points!”

Real Estate: A Time to Buy. A Time to Sell.

In April and May, housing prices in the US were at all-time highs. In some areas, they are higher than they were at the early 2007 peak, right before the real estate industry began melting down before collapsing in 2008.

Could we be in for a repeat of that?

As I’m sure you remember, when the real estate bubble burst, it sent the US economy (and the rest of the world) into what became known as The Great Recession. In less than three years, it wiped out trillions of dollars’ worth of wealth – mostly from working- and middle -class homebuyers. Thanks to the government bailout, a good deal of that money was transferred to the financial upper classes, through the conduit of Wall Street, bankers, brokers, and insurance companies.

Media pundits and Wall Street CEOs called the crash “unprecedented” and “unpredictable.” That was balderdash, Americans learned later, when books and movies about the collapse started hitting the bestseller and top-rated film lists.

I was heavily invested in real estate prior to 2006. I started pulling back in 2007, and was out entirely before the crash. My investments had been in rental houses and apartments, not in REITs or other real-estate dependent stocks. So, I wasn’t listening to CNN or reading the NYT to find out what was going on with real estate. I was looking at the local markets, and making my buy/sell decisions accordingly.

My goal back then was to make an 8% return on my investment, cash on cash, and at least 12% with leverage (a mortgage). When prices got so high that I couldn’t make those numbers, I stopped buying. It was as simple as that.

When my friends, colleagues, and Jiu Jitsu buddies that were gobbling up properties like syrup-slathered pancakes asked me why I had stopped buying, I explained it another way. I told them that I was bothered by the discrepancy between the average income of first-time homebuyers and the average cost of a starter home.

I had always heard that a healthy ratio of household income-to-house price was about 1:5 (20%). In other words, a family with an income of $50,000 should be able to buy a house priced at up to $250,000. But in 2007, the average startup houses where I was looking in South Florida were selling for $400,000 to $500,000. And the average income for first-time homebuyers was just $60,000 to $70,000.

The numbers didn’t work. Still, banks were giving mortgages to anyone and everyone that had a pulse. And then packaging that “sub-prime” paper in bundles and selling them to huge financial institutions. You know, the ones that the government later bailed out, leaving millions of middle- and working-class Americans with debt they could not possibly repay.

Today, housing prices in South Florida – and up and down the coasts – are as high (or higher) as they were back then. Household income has risen, but not as much. In terms of household income and starter-home prices, the ratio is just as bad as it was in 2007. There is a difference, however, that is important. Banks are not handing out mortgages as freely as they did back then.

What this means to me: I am not expecting another real estate collapse like the one we had 14 years ago. I’m expecting to see prices come down to a sustainable level, and, in fact, it’s already started to happen. With interest rates going up, I’m expecting them to come down a good deal more in the coming six to 18 months.

As a direct investor in real estate, that doesn’t worry me terribly. That’s because I haven’t been buying property for several years. (And won’t again till prices move into buying territory.) However, I am keeping my eye on rental rates in the areas where I own property. If those rates go down significantly, so will my future ROIs.

I’m also wondering what to do with the cash I’ve been collecting from selling off some of my properties – particularly office buildings in cities (like Baltimore) that are seeing corporate flight due to high taxes and rising crime.

I’ve been looking around in states like Texas and Nevada that are benefitting from the emigration out of California. There are some pockets of hope there. I’ve toyed with the idea of investing in REITs, but given the way the economy looks generally, and rising interest rates, I’m not sanguine about any real estate-related stocks.

More on this in an upcoming issue.

Meanwhile, here’s an interesting chart that shows the average home prices in various cities around the US and the average yearly income it would take to buy one at the 1:5 ratio. Click here.

 

The Ups and Downs of Airfare 

In the Aug. 2 issue,  I said that while inflation is likely to continue rising overall, there will likely be pockets of deflation among industries that are both competitive and cater to the working and middle classes. (Like starter real estate. See above.)

And although you wouldn’t know it if you’ve been flying lately (and experienced the crowded airports and constantly cancelled and delayed flights), domestic air travel in the US is lower than many expected this year. This may be due, at least in part, to the feeling most Americans have of being financially strapped. Click here.

The True Cost of Going Electric 

In the July 5 issue, I linked to a video that explained the true cost to the global economy of electric vehicles – both in dollar terms and in terms of the use of natural resources. EVs, it turns out, are not nearly as eco-friendly as they’ve been portrayed to be.

To find out what the real price of buying an EV is to you individually, as the buyer, click here

California to Become America’s First “Trans Refuge State”?

California Senate Bill 107 passed the Assembly Appropriations Committee on Aug. 3 with an 11 to 4 vote along party lines. It’s objective: to “make California a ‘sanctuary state’ for children seeking gender-reassignment surgeries and drugs, including children that come to California from states where such procedures are illegal.”

Click here.

 

Another Crypto Hack 

Cryptocurrencies have taken a beating this year. But crypto enthusiasts – at least the ones I know – have not given up hope. On the contrary, they are expecting another rally.

The most important thing to know about cryptocurrencies is that they are currencies. And currencies, as we know, facilitate commercial transactions by providing a trusted medium of exchange. Trust is the key word here. So long as people believe that a currency will be more or less as valuable in the future as it has been in the past, it retains its value.

The history of Bitcoin and other cryptos has been anything but steady and predictable. Chart the prices over the past 10 years and you have a rollercoaster graph. With each crash, some amount of faith disappears. That is not good.

But that’s not the only concern. The other worry is hacking and stealing. When cryptos first appeared on the scene, they were introduced as impossible to steal. But then they were stolen. And stolen again. Just last week, I read about a $190 million hack of the Nomad platform.

Click here.

And here.

No. COVID Vaccinations Are Not Entirely Risk Free.

Based on the reading I’ve done (which is more than I ever intended to spend time doing), I believe that the COVID vaccines are safe. Mostly. But not entirely. There have been reliable reports of seriously negative reactions that are disconcerting. And particularly when they are about children, whose immune systems are typically strong enough to be able to survive COVID at the same rate as they survive the common flu.

A nine-year-old died in California last week after receiving a Pfizer coronavirus vaccination. She had no listed preexisting conditions and was not hospitalized. According to VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System), this was the ninth child death reported since the FDA authorized both Moderna and Pfizer’s vaccines for children between the ages of six months and five years in June. Click here.

A Brief History of US / China Relations 

Biden’s recent statement (following Pelosi’s trip to Taiwan last week) that the US would defend Taiwan against hostility by mainland China indisputably increased tensions between the world’s two largest economies and military powers. We now find ourselves watching our politicians discuss the possibility of war against not one, but two military behemoths.

Our diplomatic difficulties with China began in 1949 when we refused to recognize the newly formed People’s Republic of China. Things got steadily worse for two decades until China invited the US table tennis team to a surprise, all-expenses-paid trip to Beijing in 1971. The following year, President Nixon visited China and then issued the Shanghai Joint Communiqué that declared Taiwan part of China.

Since then, things have gone back and forth. (Diplomats have named it Ping Pong Diplomacy.) Today, relations between our two countries may be at an all-time low.

Click here.

And click here for an editorial about Pelosi’s trip to Taiwan by Patrick Buchanan.

Kids Write the Darnedest Things 

From 11-year-old Emily Dickinson

A letter to her brother, April 18, 1842

“[T]he chickens grow very fast I am afraid they will be so large that you cannot perceive them with the naked Eye when you get home the yellow hen is coming off with a brood of chickens we found a hens next with four Eggs in it I took out three and brought them in the next day I went to see if there had been any laid and there had not been any laid and the one that was there had gone so I suppose s skonk had been there or else a hen in the shape of a skonk and I dont know which.”

From 6-year-old Virginia Woolf

A letter to her mother, 1888

“We went out for a walk with Stella this morning up to the pond and there were a lot of big boats. Mrs Prinsep says that she will only go in a slow train cos she ways all the fast trains have accidents and she told us about an old man of 70 who got his legs caute in the weels of the train and the train began to go on and the old gentleman was draged along till the train caute fire and he called out for somebody to cut off his legs but nobody came he was burnt up. Good bye”

From 12-year-old Charles Darwin

A letter to a friend, Jan. 4, 1822

“You must know that after my Georgraphy, she [his sister, Caroline] said I should go down to ask for Richards poney, just as I was going, she said she must ask me not a very decent question, that was whether I wash all over every morning. No. Then she said it was quite disgustin, then she asked me if I did every other morning, and I said no, then she said how often I did, and I said once a week, then she said of course you wash your feet every day, and I said no, then she begun saying how very disgusting and went on that way a good while, then she said I ought to do it, I said I would wash my neck and shoulders, then she said you had better do it all over, then I said upon my word I would not, then she told me, and made me promise I would not tell, then I said, well I only wash my feet once a month at school, which I confess is nasty, but I cannot help it, for we have nothing to do it with, so then Caroline pretended to be quite sick, and left the room, so then I went and told my brother, and he burst out in laughing and said I had better tell her to come wash the herself, besides that she said she did not like sitting by me or Erasmus for we smelt of not washing all over, there we sat arguing away for a good while.”

From 10-year-old Louisa May Alcott

A letter to her mother, Oct. 8, 1843

“I have spent a very pleasant morning and I hardly dare to speak to Annie [her sister] for fear she should speak unkindly and get me angry. O she is so very cross I cannot love her it sees as though she did every thing to trouble me but I will try to love her better, I hope you have spent a pleasant morning. Please axcept this book mark from your affectionate daughter.”

(Source: Letters of Note)

“It’s become a Hallmark sentiment that if you find a career that you care for passionately, everything that is disagreeable about work – the drudgery, the disappointment, and the pain – will disappear and be replaced by complete emotional and intellectual enjoyment.

“This idea is dead wrong in two fundamental ways. First, it’s unrealistic to believe that what one finds to be exciting and fulfilling at the beginning of a career will continue to be so 10 or 20 years later. That’s because it’s nearly impossible to know what a career feels like in advance. You have to do it for a while to find out. Second, working on something you care about doesn’t eliminate drudgery, disappointment, and pain. Doing anything you care about requires the same amount of suffering as something you don’t care about. The goal is not to avoid suffering, but to do work that will make it worthwhile to suffer through it.”

– Michael Masterson

A behemoth (buh-HEE-moth) – from the Hebrew for “beast” – is something that is enormous, especially a big and powerful organization. In the Old Testament, the behemoth was a beast from the Book of Job – a primeval chaos-monster (king of the animals of dry land), the counterpart of the leviathan (king of the animals of the water). As I used it today in the brief about US / China relations: “We now find ourselves watching our politicians discuss the possibility of war against not one, but two military behemoths.”

Re “A Short History of the Devolution of Air Travel” in the Aug. 2 issue: 

“This gave me a good laugh! As my wife and I prepare to take our first international flight since 2019, my feeling of trepidation has gone from a 4 out of 10 to a 9 or 10.” – ND

Re the Aug. 2 P.S. about Fred Astaire… from JM: 

“Well, you got me thinking… about Fred… I believe Eleanor Powell was his equal.”

And he included two videos to make his case. Click here. And here.

My Response: Equal in technique. Not in style.

A fascinating short lecture by Jordan Peterson on the evolutionary importance of thinking – actual thinking – and why it’s now more important than ever.

Watch it here.