Enervate sounds like it means something like “energize.” It’s actually the opposite. Derived from the Latin for “to weaken,” it means to debilitate; to deprive of strength or force. As I used it today: “Americans – old and young, healthy or not, Trump lovers and Trump haters – have traded in their enervating views on the virus and returned to the habits of the pre-COVID days.”

Continue Reading

Re what I said about honesty in the May 2 issue: 

“I wholly agree with your take on honesty. I thought you might like this zinger from William Inge: ‘Let none of us delude himself by supposing that honesty is always the best policy. It is not.’” – CR

Continue Reading

A fun cover of the 1962 hit “Monster Mash.” It took me a while to figure out that this quartet was one person with an amazing range.

Continue Reading

Actors That Make the Difference 

Gene Hackman and Al Pacino are great actors. Both have been amazingly good in so many roles over the years.

But Hackman has something that Pacino doesn’t have. Some ability – some something – to make every movie he stars in work.

Ask yourself: Have you ever seen a Gene Hackman movie that didn’t work? From The French Connection to The Conversation to Hoosiers to Mississippi Burning to The Unforgiven to Enemy of the State to The Replacements to Crimson Tide to The Firm to The Royal Tenenbaums to The Birdcage to Young Frankenstein to Uncommon Valor to Bonnie and Clyde?

Al Pacino was fantastic in The Godfather (I and II and III), Serpico, Dog Day Afternoon, Donnie Brasco, and Once Upon a Time in America. And all those movies were fantastic, too. He was good in Sea of Love and sort of good in Scarface and even Frankie and Johnny. He overdid it a bit in Scent of a Woman. But then there were all the others: Cruising, Author! Author!, The Local Stigmatic, Dick Tracy, Two Bits, City Hall, Chinese Coffee, S1m0ne, etc.

Maybe Hackman is simply better at picking movies. But I think there’s more at play. I believe he has a kind of thespian charisma that is so strong it makes bad scripts sound good and brings out the best in the actors he plays against.

Anthony Hopkins is another actor that comes to mind when I think of that sort of charisma. He was amazing in the “Hannibal” movies. His performance was key to making The Remains of the Day so successful. Likewise with Meet JoeBlack and, most recently, The Father. But I’m not sure about his movies that I haven’t seen – like The Edge, The Rite, or Fracture. Did they work? Did he make them work?

I thought I’d waste some of my time today (and some of yours when you read this) contemplating which of the several dozen “really good actors” I’ve listed below have that magic ability to make the movies they star in work. Check it out. Tell me what you think.

MALE ACTORS 

I think these actors have it: 

Gene Hackman, Anthony Hopkins, Jack Nicholson, Dustin Hoffman, Robert Downey Jr., Marlon Brando, Paul Newman, and Humphrey Bogart

And maybe these… 

Sean Penn, Joe Pesci, Robert De Niro, Tom Hanks, Denzel Washington, Kevin Spacey, Will Smith, Lawrence Olivier, Leonardo DiCaprio, Morgan Freeman, Christian Bale, Samuel L. Jackson, Brad Pitt, Sean Connery, Don Cheadle, and Mel Gibson

But probably not these…

Al Pacino, Liam Neeson, Robin Williams, Hugh Jackman, Daniel Day-Lewis, Johnny Depp, Peter O’Toole, Henry Fonda, Bruce Willis, Michael Caine, George Clooney, Jeff Bridges, and Nicholas Cage

FEMALE ACTORS 

I think these actresses have it:

Frances McDormand, Audrey Hepburn, Katharine Hepburn, Diane Keaton, Bette Davis, Jennifer Lawrence, Ingrid Bergman, and Maggie Smith

And maybe these… 

Helen Mirren, Faye Dunaway, Cate Blanchett, Elizabeth Taylor, Meryl Streep, Marilyn Monroe, Judi Dench, Jodie Foster, Glenn Close, Emma Stone, Scarlett Johansson, Jane Fonda, Charlize Theron, Vivien Leigh, Kathy Bates, Jessica Lange, Barbara Stanwyck, and Olivia de Havilland

But probably not these… 

Hillary Swank, Penelope Cruz, Ellen Burstyn, Susan Sarandon, Sandra Bulllock, Anne Hathaway, Michelle Pfeiffer, Reese Witherspoon, Shirley MacLaine, Sally Field, Nicole Kidman, Julia Roberts, Natalie Portman, Kate Winslet, Julianne Moore, Amy Adams, Viola Davis, and Sigourney Weaver

BUT WAIT. THERE’S MORE! 

Then there are the character actors that cannot save the movies they have a role in, but bring to life every scene they are in. Like…

Tom Waits, Peter Lorre, Eli Wallach, Thelma Ritter, Martin Balsam, Quentin Tarantino, J.K. Simmons, Steve Buscemi, Charles Coburn, Harry Dean Stanton, Vincent Schiavelli, Tilda Swinton, Walton Goggins, Judy Greer, and Chris Cooper

What do you think? Who did I miss? Where am I wrong?

Continue Reading

Frank James: The Name You Have Already Forgotten 

Who was Frank James?

No, I don’t mean the confederate soldier. Or the brother of Jesse James. I’m talking about the NYC subway “spree shooter” that tried to kill a bunch of people a few weeks ago. Do you remember him?

If you haven’t heard of him, or did but have forgotten his name, it’s not your fault. His terrorist attack was reported on – but just barely – by the mainstream media immediately after it happened. And then all but disappeared. You have to wonder: Why didn’t Frank James get his 15 minutes of fame?

And why didn’t the Department of Homeland Security jump on his bandwagon. By any and all criteria, he qualifies as a full-fledged domestic terrorist. He was a racist, a racial nationalist whose stated goal was to start a “race war.” And he announced his intentions over a period of months leading up to his attack. Here are some of his lines:

* “Kill all whiteys.”

* “I’m wantin’ to kill everything in sight.”

* “Asians are slant-eyed fucking pieces of shit.”

* “Spanish-speaking motherfuckers are crimes against fucking nature.”

And what about our social media guardians? The enlightened outposts that guard against “hate speech”? No, they did not cancel him. They did not banish him. They did not even remove a single one of his posts until 48 hours AFTER he went on his shooting spree.

Continue Reading

Five numbers I came across recently that may interest you:

* 9,827 – the number of cow-related items in a Minnesotan’s personal “Mooseum”

* $17,000 the cost of a first-class suite on Singapore Airlines

* 85% – the percentage of Americans who are expected to travel this summer

* 13% – the rise in world food prices in March, making it the highest level on record

* 5 – the additional number of women who will appear on US quarters next year

Continue Reading

What I Believe: About War (from Tolstoy, via Bill Bonner)

When I was 17, I registered as a conscientious objector. There were two options: (1) I won’t go under any circumstances, or (2) I’ll go, but I won’t carry a gun. I took the second option. I was drafted and had an appointment with my draft board to defend myself. I was told I would not succeed, that I’d go to prison instead. I was okay with that. When the day came to defend myself, I somehow missed the appointment. I got a call from my draft board saying I was going to jail. I heard nothing more from them after that.

The invasion of Ukraine has me thinking again about the morality and practicality of war. I wish I had the clarity of mind I had when I was younger. Defending one’s home and homeland certainly feels justifiable. Invading other countries? No. But what if, as in the case of Ukraine, the invader believes that it is a form of self-defense?

I don’t know. But my general sentiment about war is cynical. I do like what Tolstoy had to say on the subject. He believed that the upper class uses war to dominate the working class:

“They stir up their own people [against some] foreign government, and then pretend that for the well-being, or the defense, of their people they must declare war: which again brings profit only to generals, officers, officials, merchants, and, in general, to the rich. In reality war is an inevitable result of the existence of armies; and armies are only needed by Governments to dominate their own working classes.”

Continue Reading

Have the FAANG Stocks Lost Their Bite?

FAANG used to be a convenient and memorable term to describe the biggest tech giants on Wall Street: Facebook, Amazon, Apple, Netflix, and Google. But Google has changed its name to Alphabet and Facebook to Meta. So, the acronym doesn’t work anymore. NAAMA? No. ANAMA? Maybe. MAANA? Like MAANA from heaven?

FAANG is not working well now in more important ways. After dominating the high-tech markets over the last 10 years, recent earnings on all five companies are looking shaky.

* Facebook lost about 500,000 daily users in Q4 2021, and suggested it could have its first year-over-year revenue drop next quarter.

* Apple recently warned it could lose $8 billion due to supply chain constraints this quarter.

* Amazon reported its first quarterly loss in seven years, resulting in the stock tumbling about 14%.

* Netflix announced it lost subscribers for the first time in over a decade, leading its stock to drop 35% the next day and wiping $50 billion from its valuation.

* Google showed slower growth than last year and missed revenue projections for Q1, thanks in part to a weak quarter for YouTube.

So far this year, all five stocks are down, with Apple being the only one outperforming the S&P 500 index.

Continue Reading

Burj Al Arab, Dubai, United Arab Emirates

I had a very nice dinner there, along with a group of colleagues, at a company get-together in Dubai in June 2019.

The Burj Al Arab is a wonder of the modern world. Sitting atop a man-made island off the city’s beautiful shoreline, it became the tallest solo-use hotel in the world when it was built in 1994. It’s also one of the most luxurious hotels on the planet, with a magnificent terrace that overlooks a private beach, a world-class spa, and a private helipad for jet-setting clientele.

I didn’t stay there, but I read that each suite is outfitted with a private butler and Hermès bath products. The rack rate for such a suite is $1,500 per night. Or you can rent the Royal Suite for $24,000 nightly.

Continue Reading

Francisco Amighetti

Title: “Mother and Child”

Medium: Oil on Board

Dimensions: 23″ x 18″

Francisco Amighetti is one of the six Costa Rican artists that Suzanne Snider and I included as a major modern master in our book Central American Modernism. We did so because of his established reputation as the innovator of xylography. His woodcuts eventually brought him international attention and praise, with exhibits in Paris, Tokyo, and other major cities. Thanks to his legacy, Costa Rica still leads the Central American nations in printmaking.

We bought this painting in 2015. Its value has already doubled, but I wouldn’t sell it for twice that. Our bet is that prices for his work will mount considerably as the art world becomes more aware of the quality of Central American Modernist art.

Francisco Amighetti was born June 1, 1907, in San José, Costa Rica. In 1926, he entered Costa Rica’s Escuela Nacional de Bellas Artes (ENBA). He was at the ENBA for only one year. An avid reader, he learned much more from magazines and books and from his artist friends. His interest in Japanese art, in particular, was sparked by a book he came upon at the Biblioteca Nacional. (Japanese art would influence his work for the rest of his life.)

Amighetti began exploring printmaking techniques and produced a portfolio of xylography by Costa Rican artists, the first of its kind, in 1934. He became a professor at the Universidad de Costa Rica in 1944. For the next 20 years, he taught art history, printmaking, and painting.

He continued to work until his death in 1998.

“Francisco Amighetti was a great artist. He portrayed a true picture of his country’s culture and times through an innovative medium… then influenced future generations to explore and express their art through printmaking.” – Suzanne Brooks Snider

Continue Reading