Gnathonic (na-THON-ik) means sycophantic; fawning. It was derived from Gnatho, the name of a parasite in TheEunuch, a comedy written by the 2nd century BC Roman playwright Terence.

Continue Reading

Re what I said about conceptual art in the May 16 issue: 

“You should listen to your partners about conceptual art. Nobody in the business will take you seriously if you discount it as you do.” – BB, a gallerist from New York

“You are so right. Most conceptual art and performance are rubbish. But, that’s also true of so much of what is called abstract art. Question: What do you think of Cy Twombly?” – CCF

My response: I like a great deal of abstract art. Even COBRA art, which is basically finger-painting writ large. But I have to admit, I never got Cy Twombly or any of the artists that specialized in scribble-scrabble.

Continue Reading

A Heartbreaking Work of Staggering Genius 

By Dave Eggers

416 pages

First published Feb. 1, 2000 by Simon & Schuster

I read it because AS recommended it, saying, “Read it and tell me what you think of it.” (He knows that I can’t resist telling people what I think.)

I liked the title. It’s big. Intriguing. Ambitious. I expected something like Infinite Jest. It wasn’t that, but it was good. So good I had a dream about it.

An old bookstore. Eggers is reading from the book. Afterwards, as he’s signing my copy, I say, “I admire what you did here. You are a better writer than I am.”

He looks quizzically at me, smiles, and says, “No, I am a much better writer than you are.”

I blush and say, “How would you know? You’ve never seen my writing.”

And then he looks to the rest of his fans, who are standing behind me in the queue, and they are smirking.

But I won’t let that color my comments here. Dave Eggers is a very good writer. He is very smart. And he is very good with words. Clever with his sentences. Brilliant in creating layered, evocative descriptions. (See examples, below.) But the story he tells here – an account of his life as a 20-something caretaker of his little brother after both of their parents died in the same year of cancer – feels sometimes too much about his post-adolescent, anguished feelings.

That aside, there is so much to enjoy in this book. To begin with, as a preface entitled, “Rules and Suggestions for Enjoyment of This Book,” he tells the reader that it may not be worth it to read the entire thing from cover to cover and offers his recommendations for passages to read or skip. This is actually an ingenious literary device. As one reviewer put it, it allows the reader “to be fascinated either by the tale only or by the telling of the tale, which keeps him inside the fiction.”

And I really like his writing style – a style that is very much his own. Reading Eggers for the first time, I was reminded of how I felt when I first read Cormac McCarthy – delighted and intimidated.

Here are two examples from the book:

“Can you see us, in our little red car? Picture us from above, as if you were flying above us in, say, a helicopter, or on the back of a bird, as our car hurtles, low to the ground, straining on the slow upward trajectory but still at sixty, sixty-five, around the relentless, sometimes ridiculous bends of Highway 1. Look at us, godammit, the two of us slingshotted from the back side of the moon, greedily cartwheeling toward everything we are owed.”

Or this one, where he describes his mother in her final weeks:

“I step down into the garage and she spits. It is audible, the gurgling sound. She does not have the towel or the half-moon receptacle. The green fluid comes over her chin and lands on her nightgown. A second wave comes but she holds her mouth closed, her cheeks puffed out. There is green fluid on her face.”

Critical Reception 

A Heartbreaking Work of Staggering Genius won many awards, including “Best Book of the Year” from Time magazine, The Washington Post, the San Francisco Chronicle, and the Los Angeles Times. It was a finalist for the 2001 Pulitzer Prize for General Non-Fiction.

* “Is this how all orphans would speak – ‘I am at once pitiful and monstrous, I know’ – if they had Dave Eggers’s prodigious linguistic gifts? For he does write wonderfully, and this is an extremely impressive debut.” (John Banville, Irish Times)

* “A virtuosic piece of writing, a big, daring, manic-depressive stew of a book that noisily announces the debut of a talented – yes, staggeringly talented – new writer.” (Michiko Kakutani, New York Times)

* “Eggers evokes the terrible beauty of youth like a young Bob Dylan, frothing with furious anger…. He takes us close, shows us as much as he can bear…. His book is a comic and moving witness that transcends and transgresses formal boundaries.” (Washington Post)

Click here to watch an interview with Eggers about the book.

About Dave Eggers

Dave Eggers is the author of more than 40 books, including novels, nonfiction, short story collections, and children’s books. He has written several screenplays for films based on his books, including The Circle and A Hologram for the King. He is the founder of Timothy McSweeney’s Quarterly Concern, a literary journal; a co-founder of the literacy project 826 Valencia and the human rights nonprofit Voice of Witness. In 2005, he was named one of Time magazine’s “100 Most Influential People.” He lives in the San Francisco Bay area with his wife, Vendela Vida (who is also a writer), and their two children.

Continue Reading

Who Says Art Doesn’t Pay?

On May 16, Sotheby’s wrapped up its sale of an art collection that was put together by Harry and Linda Macklowe over the course of their 60-year marriage.

The total take: $922.2 million. That made it, in absolute terms, the most valuable collection ever sold at auction, topping the Rockefeller Collection that sold four years ago at Christie’s for $835.1 million. But what I like best about it is the fact that this amazing collection was put together over many decades by two people that, whatever else their differences, found a lasting and valuable marital bond in collecting art!

Half of the pieces on the auction block that night sold for more than their high estimate. The top lot was a late Mark Rothko work, Untitled (1960), which sold for $48 million.

(Source: the Robb Report)

Continue Reading

The Courier 

Released in theaters Mar. 19, 2021

Directed by Dominic Cooke

Starring Benedict Cumberbatch, Merab Ninidze, and Rachel Brosnahan

Available on various streaming services, including Amazon Prime

I’m getting into Cold War books and stories lately. Why now? Perhaps because we’ve all come to realize that the Cold War did not end in Dec. 1991, as advertised. No. It is very much going on today. And the potential consequences are as grave today as they were in 1962, during the Cuban Missile Crisis.

The Courier is a movie based, mostly, on actual events. Benedict Cumberbatch plays Greville Wynne, a British businessman that was recruited by British and US intelligence services to help them spy on the Russians. His job was to courier messages to and from Oleg Penkovsky, a Russian official. (Penkovsky was hoping that by giving secrets to the West, he could avert the nuclear war that seemed to be imminent.)

The Courier is not a great movie, but it is a good one that does a good job of conveying – in the direction, the lighting, the costuming, and the sound – the anxious, noirish, almost theatrical mood of the world back then on the eve of destruction.

Interesting: Fact and Fiction 

Although the major events of the movie are factual, there are a number of elements that were fabricated. Not by the screenwriter, interestingly, but by the source of the plot: Wynne himself. Apparently, after he was returned to England on a prisoner exchange, he had trouble finding good work to support his family. So, he became, as one critic put it, a “rent-a-spokesperson for all kinds of espionage stuff.” He made appearances in the media about anything related to spy craft. Even on subjects he knew little about. “[Wynne], bless him, for all his wonderful work, was a menace and a fabricator,” said Nigel West, an expert on British and American intelligence organizations. “He just couldn’t tell the truth!”

Critical Reception 

* “Benedict Cumberbatch delivers a masterclass in ‘acting in a vacuum’ with this disappointing historical spy drama that fails on almost every level except for the dazzling performance of its leading man.” (Kevin Maher, Times/UK)

* “Masterful in every detail… completely compelling and one of the best films of 2021.” (Michael Medved)

* “Combine impressive production values and a ratcheting up of suspense, and you’re in for a solid genre entry. Don’t expect more than that.” (Randy Myers, San Jose Mercury News)

* “If there’s such a thing as a Cold War Comfort Movie and let’s say there is, The Courier fits the bill perfectly, ticking off many of the familiar boxes of the genre.” (Richard Roeper, Chicago Sun-Times)

You can watch the trailer here.

Continue Reading

“The nuclear arms race is like two sworn enemies standing waist deep in gasoline, one with three matches, the other with five.” – Carl Sagan

Continue Reading

Counterespionage refers to covert actions taken by a country to prevent another country from discovering its military, industrial, or political secrets. In other words, it’s spies spying on spies.

Continue Reading

Too Painful to Watch

I cringed watching this. It’s Biden’s new press secretary trying to answer a question anyone that has even the most rudimentary understanding of economics would be able to answer. You can see that her problem is not that she wants to redirect the question. It’s that she actually doesn’t understand that raising corporate rates is inflationary. We have all become comfortable with Biden’s constant lapses. But to put someone so unqualified in such a public position… what were they thinking?

Continue Reading

Irish dancing like you’ve never seen it…

Continue Reading