Bits and Pieces

The Virus Is All Around Us 

The coronavirus is spreading faster now than at any time since it was first reported on Dec. 31, 1919. But the mutation that’s raging across the world right now appears to be much less serious in terms of hospitalizations and deaths, according to the CDC.

Over the Christmas/New Year holidays, we had lots of family members and friends at the house. All of them had been vaccinated. Most of them observed the “protocols” of wearing masks and bumping fists. But, as in restaurants throughout the country, when it was time to eat, the masks came off.

Four contracted the virus. Two of them had been previously infected. I noticed that there didn’t seem to be any connection between proximity and contagion. The spouses did not contract it, despite sleeping in the same bed.

This was not what one would have expected, given the information coming out of the CDC. So, what is going on?

 

New Evidence of Protection Against COVID 

Researchers with Imperial College London found that the presence of T cells from the common cold can provide some protection against the virus that causes COVID-19. The scientists assessed 52 contacts of newly diagnosed cases to pinpoint when they were first exposed, and determined that those who tested negative for COVID-19 had higher cross-reactive T cell levels.

And this just in: Cannabis compounds may prevent the COVID-19 virus from penetrating healthy human cells. Click here.

 

Meanwhile… You Can Leave the Masks at Home! 

In the latest episode of “Why I Can’t Believe Dr. Fauci,” Pfizer board member and former FDA commissioner Dr. Scott Gottlieb said on Jan. 2 that cloth masks don’t provide much protection against the Omicron variant.

“This is an airborne disease,” Gottlieb said, speaking on Face the Nation. “We now understand that, and a cloth mask is not going to protect you from a virus that spreads through airborne transmission. It could protect better through droplet transmission, something like the flu, but not something like this coronavirus.”

In a recent report, the CDC admitted as much, but made the rather tepid argument that a cloth mask “may be” better than no mask. 

“Cloth masks have been used in healthcare and community settings to protect the wearer from respiratory infections. The use of cloth masks during the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic is under debate. The filtration effectiveness of cloth masks is generally lower than that of medical masks and respirators; however, cloth masks may provide some protection if well designed and used correctly.”

 

Scary: This From a Supreme Court Justice? 

During arguments made before the Supreme Court on Jan. 7, Justice Sonia Sotomayor claimed that 100,000 children were hospitalized or seriously ill with COVID-19. When I heard that, I thought: “No way!”

In fact, the number is about 3,500, according to CDC Director Rochelle Walensky.

“In some hospitals that we’ve talked to, up to 40% of the patients who are coming in with COVID are coming in not because they’re sick with COVID, but because they’re coming in with something else and have had COVID or the Omicron variant detected,” Walensky said.

More COVID confusion: Dr. Robert Malone, a virologist and immunologist who has contributed significantly to the technology of mRNA vaccines, issued a strong caution. “Think twice before you vaccinate your kids,” he said. “Because if something bad happens, you can’t go back and say, ‘Whoops, I want a do-over.’”

 

My Hope for Adams Is Falling Fast 

In reviewing the surge in violent crime that plagued New York City under former mayor Bill de Blasio, I said that the new mayor, Eric Adams, has a great opportunity to turn the city around.

Since then, he’s done two things that have made me doubt him. First, he appointed Brendan McGuire to be the city’s Attorney General. And McGuire, it turns out, seems to be one of the new crop of AGs that believe they are entitled to, in effect,  legislate laws they don’t believe in or laws against groups they support.

Now Adams has come out in support of a new bill that would give voting rights for city elections to about 800,000 non-citizens. The law applies to legal permanent residents, people with working papers, and so-called “Dreamers,” as long as they’ve been residents of the city for 30 consecutive days.

“About 1.1 million votes were cast in the recent mayoral election,” said Dan Stein, president of the Federation for American Immigration Reform. “With the addition of some 800,000 foreign nationals to the voter rolls, they will almost certainly have an impact on the outcome of future elections.”

 

So, Who Is Ray Epps? 

Some conservative pols and commentators want to know.

What is known for sure is that he was repeatedly photographed and videotaped during the Jan. 6 fiasco prompting others to action.

He was on the FBI’s most-wanted page (concerning the fiasco) for six months. And then, mysteriously, his image was pulled off of it. He wasn’t charged. Hundreds of others that were less active were. So that got some thinking: Could Mr. Epps have been working for law enforcement?

In a recent hearing, Senator Ted Cruz asked Jill Sanborn, the FBI assistant director for national security, 10 questions about Epps and other possible undercover agents photographed at the event. Sanborn admitted that she is aware of Epps, but said she didn’t have “specific background for him.”

Cruz specifically asked whether Epps worked with the FBI. Sanborn declined to answer. He also asked whether any federal informants participated in the riots, encouraged the riots, or removed barriers.

“I cannot answer that,” Sanborn responded to each query.

“Five seconds after Mr. Epps whispered to a person, that same person began forcibly tearing down the barricades. Did Mr. Epps urge them to tear down the barricades?” Cruz asked.

“I cannot answer that,” Sanborn replied.

Senator Tom Cotton asked Assistant AG Matthew Olsen, the head of DOJ’s national security branch, a similar line of questions. Olsen said that he wasn’t aware of any plainclothes officers among the Jan. 6 crowd, and didn’t know whether any undercover agents entered the Capitol.

Olsen also said that he didn’t have any information about Epps. “This was a man on the most-wanted page for six months. Do you really expect us to believe that you don’t know anything about him?” Cotton asked.

“I simply don’t have any information at all,” Olsen responded.

The Jan. 6 committee issued the following statement shortly after the hearing: “Committee is aware of unsupported claims that Ray Epps was an FBI informant based on the fact that he was on the FBI Wanted list and then was removed from that list without being charged. The Select Committee has interviewed Mr. Epps. Mr. Epps informed us that he was not employed by, working with, or acting at the direction of any law enforcement agency.”

 

 Innocence Project Update 

Pervis Payne, middle, with his attorneys,

David Fletcher and Kelley Henry, Nov. 24, 2021

(Image: Brandon Dill/Innocence Project)

Pervis Payne spent the past 33 years on death row in Tennessee for a crime he’s always said he did not commit. Last month, he was finally removed from death row after the Shelby County District Attorney’s Office conceded that Pervis has an intellectual disability, which makes it unconstitutional to execute him.

Although there was a possibility that Judge Paula Skahan might rule on how Pervis will serve the rest of his sentence, instead she said she would issue a written ruling on his re-sentencing by Jan. 24, based on “compelling arguments” from both sides.

Nineteen family, friends, and prison officials had testified to Pervis’s “loving” and “gentle” character, and demonstrated that he would not pose a threat to society if released. In one instance, Pervis risked his life to save Captain Mosley, a veteran corrections officer, from an attack by another incarcerated individual that left him with 57 stitches.

Judge Skahan will ultimately decide whether Pervis should be given consecutive life sentences – meaning he would likely die in prison – or concurrent sentences, which would make him eligible for parole within six years.

Continue Reading

* On Business Knowledge: “There are two kinds of industry know-how: specific knowledge and wisdom. Specific knowledge changes every six months. Wisdom lasts forever. The beginning entrepreneur, if he is lucky, can make do with specific knowledge. But, unless he’s accumulating wisdom, his potential for growth over the long term is low.”  – Michael Masterson

 * On the Motivation to Write: “One must be pitiless about this matter of ‘mood.’ In a sense, the writing will create the mood…. I have forced myself to begin writing when I’ve been utterly exhausted, when I’ve felt my soul as thin as a playing card, when nothing has seemed worth enduring for another five minutes… and somehow the activity of writing changes everything.” – Joyce Carol Oates via James Clear

 * On Intellectual Input: “I notice that when all a man’s information is confined to the field in which he is working, the work is never as good as it ought to be. A man has to get a perspective, and he can get it from books or from people – preferably from both. This thing of sleeping and eating with your business can easily be overdone; it is all well enough – usually necessary – in times of trouble but as a steady diet it does not make for good business; a man ought now and then to get far enough away to have a look at himself and his affairs.” Harvey S. Firestone (written in 1926)

Continue Reading

Words to the Wise 

* Palindrome – word, a verse, a sentence, or a number that reads the same backward or forward. Easy to remember examples:

– Phrase: Able was I ere I saw Elba.

– Names: Hannah and Otto

– Numbers: 1661 and 2002

* Rumbustious means boisterous or unruly. Example (from Jaffery by William J. Locke): “The rumbustious ogre has a hitherto undescribed, but quite imaginable, gap-toothed, beetle-browed ogre of a wife.“

 * Blatherskite is silly, babbling speech that doesn’t mean anything. Example (from TheWashington Post): “British Prime Minister Boris Johnson, for whom the word ‘blatherskite’ could have been invented, says mankind stands ‘one minute to midnight,’ and without commensurate action, ‘the anger and impatience’ of the world will be ‘uncontainable.’”

 

Readers Write… 

 Comments on the “Employees’ Feelings” essay:

“Great essay today!” – FM

“I thought your essay on ‘caring too much’ was honest and brave. I hope it doesn’t get you into trouble!” – JJ

“Just wanted to say that I absorbed so much about receiving criticism and giving criticism from watching you in action. [These days] I find I have very little patience for people who put ego and too much feeling in their copy or projects, and I try not to put any into my own work…. I think it’s been a tremendous benefit to my career here. So, thank you for that on-the-job training.” – RLM

“You are such a hypocrite! You care more about your employees’ feelings – and do more for them – than any boss I’ve ever known!” – SS

 

Comments on the “Book Recommendations for 2022” issue:

“Thanks for the list of books, Mark. Probably more than I will get to, but many of the descriptions were intriguing. I’m motivated to start!.” – LS

“Just finished looking at your ambitious reading list for 2022. Good luck with all those titles! And many thanks for turning me on to ‘Shtisel.’ It is superbly written, beautifully acted, and masterfully filmed. The best series I’ve seen in years… I’ve become an evangelist for the show.”  – AG

“You mentioned that you had dyslexia as a child. I wonder if I had (or have) it too. How did you find out?” – SA

Answer: When I was young, I never recognized it. Reading was difficult. That’s all I knew. I once took a speed-reading course that my father was teaching. It taught me how to skim, and I found that much easier than reading word by word because I didn’t have to deal with the switching, which, again, I didn’t actually notice. Much later, when I was in Africa, I was tutoring a child that I suspected was dyslexic, and her mom ordered a test for her. I took it, and that’s how I found out. But by then, I had ways of coping and was determined to be a reader. I’m sure many of our coevals had the same experience.

Continue Reading

This Is Why Joe Rogan Has 11 Million Listeners on His Podcast 

He calls himself a liberal. But he has many views that appeal to conservatives, like me. Here he is talking about feelings and income inequality…

Continue Reading

Well, Okay. Good Luck With That! 

They wanted to make it a company holiday.

I opposed doing it because I saw it as a passing political fad. Making it an official day off felt like a capitulation. And that’s what I said at the board meeting when the idea was proposed.

“That’s not how it will be perceived,” the head of PR told me.

“How will it be perceived?”

I can’t remember the words she used because it was PR language. PR language is like marketing language, with which I’m familiar. At its best, it means to simultaneously inform and soothe. But her message was clear: “The company will look like it’s being run by a clutch of grumpy old fogeys.”

Still, I persisted.

“And just who would see it that way?”

“Just about everyone. The press. The local community. Even the employees.”

The press? Sure. The local community? I was dubious. But our employees? No way! We are, after all, a Libertarian-leaning publishing company. I’m aware of the fact that many of our younger employees are recent college graduates, freshly baked in gender studies, CRT, and Marxism. But surely the more experienced employees would have a more real-world view. They would see the situation as I did.

I suggested we pick up the discussion at our next board meeting. During that pause, I phoned several of our CEOs, explained the situation, and asked how they saw it. Shockingly, they all sort of agreed with our PR pro.

“It’s a different world, Mark,” one of them (a 30-something) explained. I could almost feel his hand patting me gently on the shoulder.

The night before the next board meeting, I told K the story and asked her what I should do. “Make it official,” she said.

“But it’s a capitulation. A broken link. It’s going to end badly.”

“You don’t know that.”

No, I didn’t know that for certain. But I did feel it. And strongly. It was a contest of intuitions – those of two of the oldest fogeys against a dozen younger people that were actually in charge.

We could have insisted on having our way. But what would that have accomplished? It would have made us feel that were doing the “right” thing. That was certain. And it might have preserved one link of sanity in the future chain of our company’s business culture.

But, again, we didn’t know that.

At the meeting, I voted in favor of the holiday. But in doing so, I told them what I thought: that this was a mistake that would end badly. That this capitulation could lead to others that would eventually do the company harm.

“We will make sure that doesn’t happen,” they said.

I figured they would say that. And I knew they would believe it. So I wanted to leave them with something – the smallest seed of doubt that would, in the future, alert them to what was happening if they were wrong.

I said, “Well, good luck with that!”

“Good luck with that” is an expression I picked up from Jordan Peterson. He’s the Canadian professor of psychology and evolutionary biology who first became internet famous for opposing government mandates on gender-preferred pronouns. That put him on dozens of TV and online programs, where he debates academics, journalists, and celebrities on a host of “woke” topics. Like Ben Shapiro and Candace Owens, he is superbly good at arguing his point. And, when he wants, dismantling the arguments of his opponents.

But there are times, for one reason or another, when Peterson chooses not to dismantle an opponent’s argument. He does this most often when talking to younger people and after they make a definitive statement about carving out a brave new world.

He pauses. Then he smiles and says, “Well, good luck with that.”

The statement is obviously sarcastic, but it doesn’t feel nasty in the way that sarcasm often does. It feels gentler somehow. It feels avuncular. It feels like stoic resignation. Like experience whispering to innocence.

So, that’s what I did. I capitulated on the vote because I wasn’t sure I was right. But I left them with a seed of doubt in case I was.

Continue Reading

When You Are the Voice of Experience… 2 Questions to Ask Yourself 

When you are young, you have the liberty to take up futile causes. You have the time to spend on them, and more time to abandon them when they go awry. When you are older, you can’t waste your time on idea experiments you’ve already seen fail.

That doesn’t mean you shouldn’t voice your opinion. You should. But you must do so realizing that for some of the most important questions in life – questions about what will happen if you do this or that – most people can’t learn by listening to the wisdom of their elders. They must try out their ideas for themselves.

When this happens with a young employee, I have made it a rule to ask myself two questions:

  1. “How important is this young person to the business?” If the answer is “not important,” I ignore the protest and insist on doing things my way. But when the answer is “very important,” I then ask myself…
  2. “If I let him/her learn through experience, will it be a mortal blow to the business or just a setback from which we can recover?” If it’s the latter, I acquiesce, knowing I will have a smarter superstar employee as a result.
Continue Reading

A Good Man Is Hard to Find and Other Stories 

By Flannery O’Connor

252 pages

First published in 1955 by Harcourt Brace Jovanovich

A Good Man Is Hard to Find is a collection of short stories written by Flannery O’Connor. It was the Mules’ choice for December.

Flannery O’Connor is a name I know well. She is often referred to in essays about American literature. Mostly in essays written about other authors. I knew her to be an important writer in some way, but I didn’t know what way. In fact, I knew so little about her, I spent years thinking she was a he. (Can Flannery be a man’s name?)

The title of the collection is also the title of one of the stories within. It is, I read somewhere, one of the most anthologized in American fiction. And with good reason.

These are marvelous, engaging, and powerful stories – the work of a master writer. In reading them, I found myself comparing passages to the work of some of my favorite writers, including Jane Austen, Mark Twain, and Cormac McCarthy. But they’re hard to peg. Are they Literary Fiction? Black Comedy?  Satire? Christian Morality Tales? Southern Gothic?

In discussing the book, Mules members agreed that all of these elements are there, though the collection can’t be fairly described using only one of those terms. They are better than that.

What we could not agree on was more fundamental: What was O’Connor’s view of the world when she wrote these stories? What was her view of humanity?

A few days later, one of the Mules sent out this email that gave us all more to think about:

“Smart people seem to think this month’s book by Flannery O’Connor is one of the best books ever written. I just finished the book, and I guess I’m just not that smart. So, in an attempt to figure out more about what made O’Conner tick and maybe learn why so many others think it’s such a great book, I decided to dig a little deeper into her background. There’s an incredible amount written about her. Here are just two articles that might shed some light on the possible ‘inspiration’ for her stories.”

Click here and here to read them.

 

What I Liked About It 

* The intimacy of the stories

* The seeming authenticity of the dialog

* The crisply evocative descriptions of the scenery

* The literary sophistication of the syntax and diction

* The frailty and insufficiency of the primary characters

* The gentle satire that runs beneath almost everything

* The insight into the frailty of human nature

* The insight into the power of social culture

* The immensely impressive crafting of every element of fiction and style

 

What Was Irksome

O’Connor makes abundant use of the N-word. I am not one to object to the use of any word in literature. And I never felt that the N-word was used gratuitously in these stories. Still, I found myself psychologically wincing every time I came across it, which seemed like every 5 or 6 pages. I never felt this way when reading Tom Sawyer or Huck Finn 40 years ago or when watching Quentin Tarantino movies 20 years ago. But I had it while reading these stories that were published more than 65 years ago. This is obviously not a criticism of Flannery O’Connor. If anything, it’s a criticism of our culture.

 

Interesting Facts

* The title refers to an old blues song, written by Eddie Green (an African-American songwriter) in 1917 and recorded by Bessie Smith in 1927.

* A film adaptation of “A Good Man Is Hard to Find,” entitled Black Hearts Bleed Red, was made in 1992. It’s available on Amazon Prime video.

Continue Reading

The Alpinist (2021)

A documentary by Peter Mortimer and Nick Rosen

Available to buy/rent on several streaming services

I climbed Mount Kilimanjaro. (I wrote about it here.) And I’m proud that I did. But I’m not a mountain climber. I’m not even much of a hiker. When K asks me if I want to accompany her on one of her daily hour-long treks along the beach, I tell her, “No thank you. I’ve achieved my quota of walking for life.”

So why did I decide to watch The Alpinist the other night? It’s not as if I didn’t realize I would be anxious throughout the film. I’d sweated through Free Solo, the award-winning documentary about another climber – rock climber Alex Honnold – when it came out a few years ago.

The Alpinist is a documentary about Marc-André Leclerc, an unassuming and, for most of his life, relatively anonymous mountain climber that may have broken more climbing records than any climber to date.

In contrast to Honnold, who did his most famous solo ascents alongside a camera crew, Leclerc did most of his climbing on his own, in obscurity. With no ropes, no media attention, and no mountain he wouldn’t try to scale, the story of Marc-André Leclerc – despite its angst-inducing aspects – is worth watching.

 

What I Liked About It 

* The humility and audacity of Leclerc

* His graceful athleticism when climbing

* The majestic beauty of the mountains

* The awe-inspiring ascents

I also appreciated the approach taken by the filmmakers, Peter Mortimer and Nick Rosen, both veteran climbers who’ve spent 20 years documenting the sport. As noted in a review of the film on the Roger Ebert website: “They make no pretense of impartiality, whether stressing that they spent two years filming Leclerc or expressing their anxieties about the fact that he could have fallen to his death at any moment.”

 

Critical Reception  

* “[The Alpinist is] an intriguing insight into a particular kind of obsessive drive, and a portrait of a man who, as one of his contemporaries remarked, feels almost too comfortable on the side of a mountain.” (Wendy Ide, Observer [UK])

* “The film is too pedestrian to really share Leclerc’s spirt – but it captures some of his ascents in scenes both hypnotic and terrifying, and in those you sense you glimpse the essence of him, wholly in the now.” (Danny Leigh, Financial Times)

* “The film-makers’ enthusiasm for his clarity of purpose is all well and good, but it does leave the film prone to hyperbole.” (Leslie Felperin, Guardian)

 

Interesting Facts About Alpinism (Mountain Climbing) 

From the MountainHomies website:

* Everest is the highest open grave in the world. As of January 2021, 305 people had died on the mountain, and an estimated 200 bodies were still there.

* Annapurna is the world’s deadliest mountain, with a fatality-to-summit rate of 32%.

* The Matterhorn is dangerous, not because it is especially difficult to climb, but because of its popularity. Due to the sheer number of people trekking up and down the mountain, it has a high injury rate.

* You enter the “death zone” at 8,000 meters (approx. 26,000 feet). Above that elevation, there is only about one-third of the oxygen that you find at sea level – not sufficient for humans to breathe.

Continue Reading

Bits and Pieces 

Ideas I’ve Been Chewing Over Recently…

Revolution vs. Evolution 

* Revolution is loud and fast. Evolution is quiet and slow.

* Revolution causes change, but mostly superficial change that is easily and often reversed. This is not true for evolution because evolution is not a cause, but a result.

* Revolution is linear. It moves forward and then back. Evolution moves like a river or sometimes like a switchback up a mountain.

* Evolution is deeply set and long lasting. Revolution is superficial and temporary.

 

Rationality 

* Rationality has two fundamental components: discrimination and integration.

* Discrimination is logical. Integration is analogical.

* Discrimination helps us understand how things are. Integration helps us imagine how they might be.

* One cannot have a fully functional mind without continually engaging in both processes.

 

Human Expression 

* The human being has three primary modes of expression: language, music, and physical movement.

* The primary function of language is to discriminate.

* The primary function of music is to integrate.

* Only physical movement is capable of both.

 

For the New Year, If You Dare:

Make a Deal with Your Inner Devil 

I discovered it nearly 40 years ago. I was 32 – five years into what was promising to be a comfortable but unremarkable career. I wanted more. Much more. And I wanted many mores. I was destined to get few or none of them. But when I put this secret to use, my life changed immediately and enormously.

I’m talking about establishing a singular goal in life and adhering to a hyper-focused routine. I’m talking about giving up – at least until that primary goal is achieved – all other goals and ambitions. It is a deal you make with the devil inside you. It almost certainly means neglecting friends and family. And it might turn you into someone you don’t want to be. But it has the virtue of being simple. And extremely powerful. It will definitely give you the best possible chance of achieving that one thing you want more than anything else.

It worked for me, quickly and completely. I crashed through my initial goal and then exceeded it by 20,000%. But like all deals with the devil, it changed me. And it could have ruined me. In my 50th year, I abandoned it and began to work on other goals and achieve more balance in my life.

I never put a name to it. But I can say that it is an emanation of “The Power of One.” Probably the most important one.

It’s putting the immense power of singularity towards radically changing some important aspect of your life – your health, your wealth, your social life, or your personal life. If you think you’d like to harness this power for a change in your life, here is how it goes:

  1. Make a list of 50 aspirations.
  2. Narrow that list to 10. Consciously and purposefully, let go of the other 40.
  3. Narrow the list of 10 to 3. Consciously and purposefully, let go of the other 7.
  4. Narrow the list of 3 to 1. Consciously and purposefully, let go of the other 2.
  5. Confirm, in some formal way, your one and only goal. Let the people you care about know that, until you achieve this goal, it will be your top priority.
  6. Create a multi-year plan to achieve it.
  7. Break that plan into one-year goals. Then into monthly goals. Then weekly goals. And, finally, into daily tasks.
  8. Spend the first hour of every day – and 80% of your spare time – pursuing that one objective.
  9. Do your best, with the 20%, to keep everything else you value from falling apart.

 

Good Bye, Bill. I Won’t Miss You! 

I’ve not lived there for 40 years, but in some ways, I still consider myself a New Yorker. Like most expatriates, I identify with everything that is great about the city. And there used to be so much. Lately, however, it has devolved in several critical respects. It has become, in the memorable verbiage of our former president, a metropolitan shithole. This is largely due to the woke politics of Bill DeBlasio and a cast of cronies, including the infamous AOC. For example:

* From 2012 to 2018, 200,000 left the city. In 2021, 300,000 fled, most of them high-income earners.

* New York has also lost many big and vibrant businesses due to higher taxes and soaring crime. And it has lost hundreds of restaurants and retail stores due to the COVID lockdown.

* Murders are up 50%. Rapes are up 25%. Even my wokest friends, loyal denizens of the city, feel it’s unsafe to take a walk at night.

* Plus, New York has become the dirtiest city in the country. Its infrastructure is crumbling. Its sanitation is Third World.

Yes, it’s a shithole right now. But it can recover. The Big Apple has been rotten before. It was a dirty, dangerous shithole when I was in my teens. And it came back beautifully from that. Its best hope is its new mayor, Eric Adams. He’s got his work cut out for him. But as a former policeman, he seems to understand that the first priority in fighting crime is a belief in law and order. Whether he will actually do anything about that remains to be seen.

 

Meanwhile, in California…

Easy-on-Crime Policies Continue to Spur Both Violent Crime and Theft 

Since George Gascón took office as LA’s Attorney General 13 months ago, the city has seen a 50+% spike in homicides and a 16+% jump in aggravated assaults. Carjackings and auto thefts are up more than 50%. So is just about every other type of crime. And former LA District Attorney Steve Cooley says that these numbers may be understated because the public has lost faith in the justice system.

In San Francisco, more than 50 prosecutors, support, and victim services staff have quit their jobs since District Attorney Chesa Boudin began implementing his progressive criminal justice policies. (Boudin campaigned on a platform to end mass incarceration, eliminate cash bail, and vowed to create a panel to review sentencing and potential wrongful convictions.)

“The office is imploding,” said a former prosecutor who produced the list of those who’ve left their jobs since Boudin was sworn into office on Jan. 10, 2020.

 

Another Busybody Bad Idea 

When you hear about some new trend in criminality or social stupidity, you may react as I sometimes do: “There should be a law!”

The problem with such thinking is that it is reactionary and, therefore, superficial. It does not take into account all the possible unintended and undesired consequences. Many of those consequences result in less personal freedom. And that matters. Individual freedom is the bedrock of a strong and prosperous society. It supports political fairness, social health, justice, and economic growth.

A small but typical example: In response to gas prices tripling in 1974, the Nixon administration passed the Emergency Highway Energy Conservation Act that mandated a national speed limit of 55 mph. Until then, speed limits had varied state to state, and went as high as 80 mph on long stretches of road in the West. It was projected to decrease national gas consumption by roughly 2.2%.

You wouldn’t think that a 2.2% reduction would be worth such a restrictive federal mandate, but it was implemented. It resulted in billions of dollars in additional transportation costs. And, it turned out, the actual reduction was only one-tenth of 2.2%.

In 1987, the national speed limit was officially raised to 65 mph. And by 1995, the law was fully repealed, returning control of speed limits to the individual states.

Prediction: If the Biden administration succeeds in either federal vaccine mandates or federal voting mandates, they will prove equally ineffective, will have all kinds of undesired consequences, and will be repealed in fewer than 10 years.

 

Meta-Nation Update: Twitter Banishes Non-Compliant Citizens 

In an essay titled “What You Need to Know Right Now About the Metaverse,” I said that the metaverses of the future will act as meta-nations, controlling their ersatz citizens through shunning and banishment. Here is an update on how it’s already happening:

* Grabien News was suspended by Twitter last month for posting a video of a US Congressman (Rep. Andy Biggs) criticizing pharmaceutical corporations. “Obviously, in this case,” said Grabien founder Tom Elliott, “quoting an elected leader on an issue that matters to everyone is important and newsworthy, regardless of whether you agree…. This is “next-level Twitter absurdity.”

* Dr. Robert Malone, who helped develop the mRNA vaccine technology, was suspended Jan. 3 for allegedly violating Twitter’s terms and conditions. On Jan. 2, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene’s personal Twitter page had been suspended for similar reasons.

* Former New York Times journalist Alex Berenson filed a lawsuit against Twitter after his account, which had amassed hundreds of thousands of followers, was banned.

* And last month, former CEO Jack Dorsey resigned from his position at Twitter, sparking concern that the San Francisco-based company would take a tougher stance on what content can be posted.

 

Literary Books Entering the Public Domain in 2022 

Over the last two years, several dozen great works of literature have entered the public domain. That means you can sell these books – or turn them into movies – without paying royalties. As of Jan. 1, 2022, the following books (all published in 1926) were added to the list:

* Willa Cather, My Mortal Enemy

* Agatha Christie, The Murder of Roger Ackroyd

* William Faulkner, Soldiers’ Pay

* Ernest Hemingway, The Sun Also Rises

* Ernest Hemingway, The Torrents of Spring

* Zora Neale Hurston, Color Struck

* D.H. Lawrence, The Plumed Serpent

* D.H. Lawrence, The Rocking-Horse Winner

* T.E. Lawrence, Seven Pillars of Wisdom

* A.A. Milne, Winnie-the-Pooh

* Vladimir Nabokov, Mary

* Dorothy Parker, Enough Rope

* Franz Kafka, Das Schloss (The Castle)

* Vita Sackville-West, The Land

 

Worth Quoting 

Gus D’Amato, the legendary trainer of Mike Tyson and other top boxers, on courage:

“I tell my kids, what is the difference between a hero and a coward? What is the difference between being [cowardly] and being brave? No difference. Only what you do. They both feel the same. They both fear dying and getting hurt. The man who is [cowardly] refuses to face up to what he’s got to face. The hero is more disciplined and he fights those feelings off and he does what he has to do. But they both feel the same, the hero and the coward. People who watch you judge you on what you do, not how you feel.”

(Source: Bad Intentions: The Mike Tyson Story​)

 

Words to the Wise 

* A word I’ve always misunderstood: jejune.  I’ve always thought, correctly, that it is related to the French word juene, as in young. And, thus, means “childish or immature.” In fact, it derives from the Latin jejunus, which means “fasting.” As in empty. Thus, its primary meaning is “insubstantial or lacking substance.” Childish and immature are secondary synonyms, but the more common denotation is banal or insipid.

* A word I’m going to use next time I’m in Istanbul: dragoman. A dragoman is a professional guide for travelers, especially when Arabic, Turkish, or Persian is spoken.

* A word I’m going to use next time I see someone wolfing down a meal: ingurgitate. To ingurgitate is to swallow something greedily.

 

Letters to the Editor 

From a reader after a visit to Rancho Santana

“The people at Rancho Santana are so nice and welcoming. The food was delicious and I loved how everything is so sustainable and fresh. The beautiful beaches and scenery transcend you immediately when you arrive. Great energy, beauty, and fun. And the spa is absolutely incredible!” – SB

Continue Reading