A Good Man Is Hard to Find and Other Stories 

By Flannery O’Connor

252 pages

First published in 1955 by Harcourt Brace Jovanovich

A Good Man Is Hard to Find is a collection of short stories written by Flannery O’Connor. It was the Mules’ choice for December.

Flannery O’Connor is a name I know well. She is often referred to in essays about American literature. Mostly in essays written about other authors. I knew her to be an important writer in some way, but I didn’t know what way. In fact, I knew so little about her, I spent years thinking she was a he. (Can Flannery be a man’s name?)

The title of the collection is also the title of one of the stories within. It is, I read somewhere, one of the most anthologized in American fiction. And with good reason.

These are marvelous, engaging, and powerful stories – the work of a master writer. In reading them, I found myself comparing passages to the work of some of my favorite writers, including Jane Austen, Mark Twain, and Cormac McCarthy. But they’re hard to peg. Are they Literary Fiction? Black Comedy?  Satire? Christian Morality Tales? Southern Gothic?

In discussing the book, Mules members agreed that all of these elements are there, though the collection can’t be fairly described using only one of those terms. They are better than that.

What we could not agree on was more fundamental: What was O’Connor’s view of the world when she wrote these stories? What was her view of humanity?

A few days later, one of the Mules sent out this email that gave us all more to think about:

“Smart people seem to think this month’s book by Flannery O’Connor is one of the best books ever written. I just finished the book, and I guess I’m just not that smart. So, in an attempt to figure out more about what made O’Conner tick and maybe learn why so many others think it’s such a great book, I decided to dig a little deeper into her background. There’s an incredible amount written about her. Here are just two articles that might shed some light on the possible ‘inspiration’ for her stories.”

Click here and here to read them.

 

What I Liked About It 

* The intimacy of the stories

* The seeming authenticity of the dialog

* The crisply evocative descriptions of the scenery

* The literary sophistication of the syntax and diction

* The frailty and insufficiency of the primary characters

* The gentle satire that runs beneath almost everything

* The insight into the frailty of human nature

* The insight into the power of social culture

* The immensely impressive crafting of every element of fiction and style

 

What Was Irksome

O’Connor makes abundant use of the N-word. I am not one to object to the use of any word in literature. And I never felt that the N-word was used gratuitously in these stories. Still, I found myself psychologically wincing every time I came across it, which seemed like every 5 or 6 pages. I never felt this way when reading Tom Sawyer or Huck Finn 40 years ago or when watching Quentin Tarantino movies 20 years ago. But I had it while reading these stories that were published more than 65 years ago. This is obviously not a criticism of Flannery O’Connor. If anything, it’s a criticism of our culture.

 

Interesting Facts

* The title refers to an old blues song, written by Eddie Green (an African-American songwriter) in 1917 and recorded by Bessie Smith in 1927.

* A film adaptation of “A Good Man Is Hard to Find,” entitled Black Hearts Bleed Red, was made in 1992. It’s available on Amazon Prime video.

The Alpinist (2021)

A documentary by Peter Mortimer and Nick Rosen

Available to buy/rent on several streaming services

I climbed Mount Kilimanjaro. (I wrote about it here.) And I’m proud that I did. But I’m not a mountain climber. I’m not even much of a hiker. When K asks me if I want to accompany her on one of her daily hour-long treks along the beach, I tell her, “No thank you. I’ve achieved my quota of walking for life.”

So why did I decide to watch The Alpinist the other night? It’s not as if I didn’t realize I would be anxious throughout the film. I’d sweated through Free Solo, the award-winning documentary about another climber – rock climber Alex Honnold – when it came out a few years ago.

The Alpinist is a documentary about Marc-André Leclerc, an unassuming and, for most of his life, relatively anonymous mountain climber that may have broken more climbing records than any climber to date.

In contrast to Honnold, who did his most famous solo ascents alongside a camera crew, Leclerc did most of his climbing on his own, in obscurity. With no ropes, no media attention, and no mountain he wouldn’t try to scale, the story of Marc-André Leclerc – despite its angst-inducing aspects – is worth watching.

 

What I Liked About It 

* The humility and audacity of Leclerc

* His graceful athleticism when climbing

* The majestic beauty of the mountains

* The awe-inspiring ascents

I also appreciated the approach taken by the filmmakers, Peter Mortimer and Nick Rosen, both veteran climbers who’ve spent 20 years documenting the sport. As noted in a review of the film on the Roger Ebert website: “They make no pretense of impartiality, whether stressing that they spent two years filming Leclerc or expressing their anxieties about the fact that he could have fallen to his death at any moment.”

 

Critical Reception  

* “[The Alpinist is] an intriguing insight into a particular kind of obsessive drive, and a portrait of a man who, as one of his contemporaries remarked, feels almost too comfortable on the side of a mountain.” (Wendy Ide, Observer [UK])

* “The film is too pedestrian to really share Leclerc’s spirt – but it captures some of his ascents in scenes both hypnotic and terrifying, and in those you sense you glimpse the essence of him, wholly in the now.” (Danny Leigh, Financial Times)

* “The film-makers’ enthusiasm for his clarity of purpose is all well and good, but it does leave the film prone to hyperbole.” (Leslie Felperin, Guardian)

 

Interesting Facts About Alpinism (Mountain Climbing) 

From the MountainHomies website:

* Everest is the highest open grave in the world. As of January 2021, 305 people had died on the mountain, and an estimated 200 bodies were still there.

* Annapurna is the world’s deadliest mountain, with a fatality-to-summit rate of 32%.

* The Matterhorn is dangerous, not because it is especially difficult to climb, but because of its popularity. Due to the sheer number of people trekking up and down the mountain, it has a high injury rate.

* You enter the “death zone” at 8,000 meters (approx. 26,000 feet). Above that elevation, there is only about one-third of the oxygen that you find at sea level – not sufficient for humans to breathe.

Bullshit Art Criticism 

The Black guy is halfway anchored to reality. The young woman has overdosed on art criticism.