In the mood to watch a beat-down? Here’s what happens when a bully with a big head walks into a boxing gym.

I saw a similar thing happen when two toughs came into my dojo and challenged Renato, one of my BJJ teachers, to a grappling match.

I like stories like this. I wish they would happen more often.

Continue Reading

It’s been a frantic week for K and me at Rancho Santana.

With 45 family members here to enjoy all this wonderful resort community has to offer, we’ve been busy day and night managing and participating in all the activities. Besides visiting the five beaches and 2,700 acres of walking, biking, and horseback riding trails, we’ve eaten in a different restaurant every night, held a family Olympics, and displayed our questionable dramatic and artistic talents at a karaoke competition.

Tomorrow morning, most will be leaving, back to their homes in Florida, California, New York, Paris, and Rome. This evening, we had a farewell party that included traditional folkloric dancing, a piñata for the kids, and fireworks.

If you are thinking about a destination for a wedding, business trip, or family reunion, you have to check out Rancho Santana. For more information, go HERE.

Continue Reading

A Sport and a Pastime

by James Salter

204 pages

Originally published in 1967

Paperback published in 2006 by Farrar, Straus and Giroux

A Sport and a Pastime – another Mules Book Club selection – is a short novel. Just 200-something pages. I bought an old paperback copy that I read in bed, and an audio version that I listened to while driving.

I enjoy consuming a book this way. It’s efficient, and it’s multidimensional. Sometimes, when the reader is especially good, I prefer the audiobook. Other times, when I like the voice in my head better than the reader’s, I favor the print. In this case, although the reader did a good job with the dialog, I was less than happy with his reading of the many poetic passages. I wanted him to savor them. He chewed them up.

A Sport and a Pastime is considered by most critics to be a modern classic. And its author, James Salter, has been canonized among America’s great late-20th century novelists, along with Philip Roth, John Updike, and Norman Mailer. When the book was recommended, I thought, “Well, another book I’ve read before.” With the opening paragraph, I realized I hadn’t. And that I was in for a treat:

September. It seems these luminous days will never end. The city, which was almost empty during August, now is filling up again. It is being replenished. The restaurants are all reopening, the shops. People are coming back from the country, the sea, from trips on roads all jammed with cars. The station is very crowded. There are children, dogs, families with old pieces of luggage bound by straps. I make my way among them. It’s like being in a tunnel. Finally I emerge onto the brilliance of the quai, beneath a roof of glass panels which seems to magnify the light.

 

The Story

A Sport and a Pastime is the story of a summer romance between Philip Dean, an American middle-class college dropout, and Anne-Marie, a French girl. It is told by a highly intelligent, highly self-conscious, and ultimately unreliable narrator (who is unnamed).

The plot – well, it doesn’t have a plot. Unless you think this is a plot… Chapter One: Wake, walk, talk, eat, drink, fuck. Chapter Two: Wake, fuck, eat, walk, go to the movies, drink, fuck. Other chapters: The same, but in a slightly different order.

If that sounds like a condemnation, it’s not. Not entirely. For many good reasons, A Sport and a Pastime deserves its literary status. Salter’s prose is engaging and seductive. The dialog is natural and efficient. The sex scenes are not (as many critics have said) pornographic, but erotic. Erotic in a sparse and almost clinical way. And that renders them believable – which, one realizes in reading them, is a significant literary accomplishment.

Lacking the typical arc of a conventional plot, the narrative gets its forward motion by the elegance of the prose and the mystery of the narrator. He presents himself as a friend of Dean, the protagonist. But he admits to his unreliability from the very first chapter and continues to remind the reader that the narration, though it flows like a memoir, is entirely a product of fiction. In fact, I had the notion that Dean and the narrator were one. Dean being the imagined Alpha of the narrator, or – perhaps more interestingly – the narrator being the imagined Nick Carraway to the author’s actual self.

 

Critical Reception

A Sport and a Pastime is, as I said, considered a modern classic. But only I and one other Mule felt it deserved that reputation. The rest panned it severely. Most didn’t even finish it. “It’s like Dick and Jane Have Sex,” one said. “Sixteen times in sixteen chapters.”

I was shocked. Most of the time, there is general agreement about the books we read. But A Sport and a Pastime may be the least-liked book we’ve read since we began meeting 10 years ago. Hell, sophomoric, pseudo-literary novels like The Kite Runner, The Underground Railroad, and Where the Crawdads Sing got better reviews.

Reynolds Price, in The New York Times Book Review, wrote: “Of living novelists, none has produced a novel I admire more than A Sport and a Pastime… it’s as nearly perfect as any American fiction I know.”

And as recently as 2017, Sarah Hall, writing for The Guardian, had this to say: “Since its publication in 1967, during the decade of sexual revolution, A Sport and a Pastime has set the standard not only for eroticism in fiction, but for the principal organ of literature – the imagination. What appears at first to be a short, tragic novel about a love affair in France is in fact an ambitious, refractive inquiry into the nature and meaning of storytelling, and the reasons we are compelled to invent, in particular, romances. That such a feat occurs across a mere 200 pages is breathtaking, and though its narrative choreography seems simple, the novel is anything but minor.”

 

Note: If, after reading A Sport and a Pastime, you want to know more about James Salter, there’s a 54-minute documentary (available on Amazon Prime) that explains his “love affair” with France and his place in modern American fiction. It includes plenty of snippets of his writing, which will give you a feel for the terse beauty of his prose style.

You can watch the trailer here.

Continue Reading

Oslo (2021)

Available on HBO

Directed by Bartlett Sher

Starring Andrew Scott, Ruth Wilson, and Jeff Wilbusch

Oslo is the story of negotiations that took place in Norway in 1993 between Israel and the Palestinian Liberation Organization. The negotiations were conducted in secret because Israeli policy forbade interacting with or otherwise acknowledging the authority of the PLO. They were facilitated by a Norwegian couple that had no authority to run them. But they did. And after nearly 6 months, they succeeded with a historical agreement between Israel’s Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin and PLO leader Yasser Arafat, presented in Washington, DC, with US President Bill Clinton (who had nothing to do with it) standing beside them.

 

What I Liked 

* It’s an amazing story. Worth watching only to understand what an insanely ambitious idea it was, how difficult it was to pull it off, and how resourceful and persistent the Norwegian couple had to be to make it happen.

* Very good acting by everyone, with a standout performance by Salim Daw as the finance minister of the PLO.

 

What I Didn’t Like 

* The interaction between the two lead characters – the couple that actually made the negotiations happen. There was no real chemistry between them. The movie didn’t work when they were in the scene.

* It looked like it was based on a play – meaning there are lots of speeches and the movement of the actors is generally confined. I looked it up and, yes, Oslo was adapted from the Tony award-winning play of the same name by J.T. Rogers. There are many moments when you can imagine how much better the scene might have been on stage.

 

Critical Reception 

* “Rogers’ stage play is a smart, mature piece of writing, but one that transfers rather clumsily to the small screen, in part because its makers don’t show quite the same confidence in their audience’s intelligence.” (Peter Debruge, Variety)

* “Oslo serves as a haunting portrayal of what was, and a sobering reflection on conditions as they currently exist.” (Brian Lowry, CNN)

* “The film is at its strongest when it uses their individual journeys during the negotiations to serve as metaphors for the complicated emotions and human suffering intertwined in the larger Israeli-Palestinian mess.” (Lorraine Ali, Los Angeles Times)

You can watch the trailer here.

Continue Reading

China vs. the USA 

During his tenure as president, Donald Trump started a trade war with China. He had an argument. China was subsidizing some of its exports to gain market share. We do that, too. But China did it more. So, he imposed duties and sanctions. And China responded with more of its own.

It was good for several US industries. Bad for others. On the whole, it didn’t work. It resulted in widespread shortages of all sorts of essential US needs – from steel to sheet rock to washing machines and microchips. American businesses and consumers began to experience significant cost increases in manufactured goods. At the end of Trump’s term in office, the US economy had gotten smaller, while the Chinese economy had gotten bigger.

The Biden administration isn’t officially continuing the trade war, because it won’t officially continue any policy that Trump initiated. But they are “standing up” to China by leaving some of the worst parts of the trade war in place and picking fights with the Chinese in other areas of exchange. Possibly the worst – and most dangerous – is a promise to stand against China’s claim on Taiwan. Some analysts have suggested that we are on the verge of new Cold War.

Why would Biden’s international decision-makers do that?

Here’s what I think:

Any good marketer will tell you that, next to making great products and providing excellent customer service, the most effective way to build a base of loyal customers – and get them to spend lots of money – is to identify a fear, personify it as a scary monster, and then promote your business or product as the hero they need to defeat it. (Margarine vs. Animal Fat. Apple vs. Complicated. Tesla vs. Fossil Fuels.)

Political parties were playing this game long before Madison Avenue perfected it. But they have taken it to a new level in the digital information age with the ability to instantly test plots and characters for “stickiness,” hire skilled copywriters to compose narratives around the winners, and then flush them out to millions with the click of a send button.

Trump got into the White House by telling the immigration invasion story better than anyone before him. Shocked by his success, Democrats, Moderate Republicans, Big Tech, and the Liberal Media went to work full time trying to oust him, exhuming the decaying corpse of Ravaging, Radical Russia as America’s Adversary #1.

For two years, they did their best to sell the Russian Collusion story, but failed for lack of hard evidence. They continued characterizing Trump as a racist and xenophobe – but that image only enraged the Trump haters. The rest of the voting public didn’t buy it. The BLM/Antifa rioting and looting that tore up virtually every large Democratic-run city last year didn’t win them any converts. Things were looking good for Trump going into the election. But then – like a deus exmachina from a Greek drama – COVID-19 struck and Trump’s response to it gave them a really scary monster that saved the day. Trump was out. Bidden/Harris were in. Democracy was saved.

Or was it?

Trump left the White House with a social mandate every bit as big and powerful as the Biden team had coming in. The interim elections were in doubt. But then the Fates intervened a second time with the pathetic Trump-loving, self-styled patriots’ storming of the Capital with an intensity that seemed naïve. The true believer bought into it, hook, line, and sinker. But the rest of the country gave it short shrift.

Meanwhile, Trump supporters and other conservatives were working their own marketing game, showing nightly clips of the surge of violent, Black-on Black crime that was accelerating in the big cities and the tens of thousands of illegal immigrants that were pouring across the southern border, being processed and released, and then shipped out to destinations undisclosed all over America. A million have crossed already and a million more will be here, at this rate, by the end of the year.

The conservative story was getting scarier by the actual facts. But the liberal story was losing steam by the actual facts, too. Police killings of unarmed African-Americans was being seen for what it is – a small problem compared to the 1000-times larger problem of Blacks killing Blacks. Not that liberals ever cared about that anyway.

The threat of Russia was being understood for what it was – an absurdity compared to the threat of Islamic terrorism. Putin’s Scary Meter was in decline. Even the Dems’ most loyal legions could not quite believe that Putin’s main goal was to destroy US democracy.

On top of that, the entire US population – Red and Blue – was growing tired of the Scary COVID Monster and the lockdown that was being pushed by Democratic leaders and hailed by the NYT and CNN.

Looking back at it now, liberal political analysts could see that although their big goal – dethroning the Orange-Topped Ogre – had been achieved, they had done little to offset the threat of losing badly in 2022. In accomplishing Trump’s defeat, they had also, inadvertently, desensitized the entire population to living in fear generally, and especially to government- and media-hyped fear mongering.

And that, for a new administration hoping to push the largest social spending agenda in the history of the world, was a Big Problem.

I’m sure there were all sorts of internal debates about how to accomplish that. But in the end, whoever it is that makes political decisions for Biden persuaded him that a bigger Scary Monster was needed. Bigger than Putin. Bigger than Russia. And certainly bigger than domestic terrorism, which was, for all intents and purposes, DOA.

Rather than invent something entirely new, they opted for a Hollywood solution. They would continue to push on the domestic terrorism story, but more as a distraction while they patched together a new Scariest-Ever Monster. It had to be huge – much bigger than little old Russia. And what could be bigger than the biggest country in the world… China?

Yes, China was Trump’s Monster. But for Trump and his followers, it was a relatively little monster. It was all about unfair trade practices, The new monster was to be a Frankenstein creation of the little head of Rabid, Rapacious Russia on the colossally big body of Cheerless, Cheating China.

And as an added bonus, China came with a Big, Scary Monster Dog. As the least cooperative, most rabid consumer of fossil fuels on the globe, a Cold War on China would appeal to proponents of the Green New Deal.

It was an unlikely invention. But it had the advantage of pandering to the fan base of Trump haters (by attacking Russia), Trump lovers (by attacking China), and eco-friendly voters to boot. And as H.L. Mencken famously said, “No one in this world, as far as I know, has ever lost money by underestimating the intelligence of the American people.”

So it could work. If promoted skillfully, it could succeed in getting the votes the Dems need to pass all or at least some of the multitrillion-dollar spending bills they had already written before the election. And maintain or even increase their control of both houses of Congress.

And that is why, IMHO, the Biden/Harris team is starting to push against China. You can disagree with it, but what you can’t do is ignore the question of how smart it would be for the US to get into a coldish economic and political war with China.

Could we afford it? Could we win it? Could we even come close?

Putting aside the fact that the US has not won a single war in the past 50 years – including the Vietnam War, the War Against Terrorism, the War Against Drugs, and the War Against Poverty – could we actually win a Cold War against China and Russia at the same time?

Let’s look at some facts as they relate to China:

10 Ways China Is Beating the US Economically 

  1. China is no longer the minor economy it was 30 years ago that can be ignored or pushed around. In fact, it is theworld’s second-largest economy when measured by nominal GDP, and the world’s largest economywhen measured by Purchasing Power Parity (PPP), which, according to some, is a more accurate measure of an economy’s size.
  2. In the past 10 years, China has made huge capital investments in its economy and has seen rapid productivity growth. Click here.
  3. The US economy depends on Chinese products. We are its biggest customer. Click here.
  4. China is increasingly dominating the global technology industry. Click here.
  5. China’s infrastructure is far ahead of the US. Click here.
  6. China knows how to make and sell things more cheaply than the US can. Click here.
  7. China knows how to build things faster than we can in the US. Example: A 57-story skyscraper was built in 19 days, and the San Yuan Bridge in Beijing was taken down and rebuilt in 43 hours. In contrast, the US has a major problem with gridlock. Click here.
  8. Chinese millennials are incredibly entrepreneurial. Click here.
  9. In terms of day-to-day quality of life, there are some things that are world-class in China – possibly better than they are in the US. Harrison Jacobs recently spent 6 weeks in China and identified 5 things that he says the Chinese do “infinitely better” than we do. Click here.
  10. And if all this were not enough, China has the second-largest military in the world and is leading the world on electronic surveillance of its citizens.

When I look at my crystal ball, the picture is pretty clear. The US, the world’s economic and political heavyweight for the last 100 years, is in political and social disarray. Its economy is bankrupt. It hasn’t had a positive balance of trade in decades. It’s $40 trillion in debt and yet is spending money faster now than ever in its history.

Its sense of identity has been balkanized into dozens of warring cultures, while its governing classes, from both sides of the aisle, have lost any interest in working towards the common good.

Meanwhile, China has a massive military and a part-centralized, part-free-market economy that, for the moment, is outpacing the US in almost every economic category.

Based on the above, I can’t see how getting into a cold-war-like shit-throwing contest with China makes any sense for the US. What do you think?

Continue Reading

China’s Cultural Revolution 

To understand how the Chinese economy got where it is today, you need to know a bit about China’s Cultural Revolution and what happened after that.

In 1966, 17 years after Mao Zedong established the People’s Republic of China as a Communist state, he set in motion the “Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution,” whose purpose was to “to struggle against and crush those persons in authority who are taking the Capitalist road.”

Soon gangs of students and the government’s so-called Red Guards attacked people wearing “bourgeois clothes” on the street, “Imperialist” signs were torn down, and intellectuals and party officials were murdered or driven to suicide. Those that submitted to the revolution were forced to publicly admit to their status and repent for their past transgression, before they were stripped of their homes and other private property and sent out to the country to work as laborers for the party.

The result was 10 years of economic destruction, famine, repression, and widespread violence that crippled the economy and left more than a billion people poverty-stricken and hungry.

But then, after Mao died, China liberalized its economy under Deng Xiaping, whose Boluan Fanzheng program dismantled the Maoist policies associated with the Cultural Revolution and allowed for a significant amount of private enterprise.

As a result, China is no longer the overpopulated, poverty-plagued country it was 40 years ago. It is a major military and economic power – as large or nearly as large as the US, and growing much faster. And without the US’s terrible debt problem.

Click here for a good, quick review of the Cultural Revolution.

Continue Reading

Despite the challenge of getting here via Liberia, Costa Rica, the 45 Cousin Camp attendees were graciously welcomed by the staff at Rancho Santana, quickly helped into their beautiful rooms and suites overlooking the ocean, and then treated to a fantastic, family-styled dinner masterminded by Brian Block and Erik Wetz. Thanks in large part to Brian and Erik, Rancho Santana competes with the best resorts in the world in terms of guest experience. (Travel & Leisure consistently rates us in the top 100. Last time I checked, we were 38.)

There are four places to eat at Rancho Santana: La Finca y el Mar, a full-service restaurant attached to the hotel; La Boquita, a tapas restaurant at the edge of a beautiful cove; La Taqueria, a taco and tequila eatery on Playa Los Perros, one of our five beaches – the one where some of our party will be taking surfing lessons throughout the week – and El Café for a quick bite.

Continue Reading

And About the F Word… 

In discussing podcasts, a colleague wrote: ”Oh, Man! I can’t stand listening to a podcast with two old guys throwing the F Word around – like they’re trying to one-up each other with how many times they can say FUCK!”

I agree. Vulgar language – whether on podcasts or anywhere else – is akin to sports cars and beachwear. Some things that work for you when you are young make you look foolish when you are not.

There should be a rule about using the F word as you age. You can use it all you want in your teens… once a day in your 20s… once a week in your 30s… once a month in your 40s… once a year in your 50s. And once you hit your 60s, you should have found another word – like “Fudge!” – that is more age appropriate.

Continue Reading

This little video was done months ago, but it does a good, quick job of explaining how the immune system works –  including those B- and T-cells you’ve probably heard about…

Continue Reading

The Good, the Bad, the Uncertain

Making Sense of Recent News Stories 

GOOD: Illinois Bans Lying to Juveniles During Interrogations 

Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker signed a bill prohibiting police from using deception during interrogations of minors, the first law of its kind in the US. The new law bans commonly used deceptive interrogation tactics, including making false promises of leniency and false claims about the existence of incriminating evidence. According to The Innocence Project, such tactics have long been used to induce false confessions, which have played a role in about 30% of all wrongful convictions overturned by DNA evidence.

 Click here.

 

BAD: Killings Continue in Chicago 

Despite Mayor Lori Lightfoot’s insistence that crime is going down in the Windy City, shootings and killings continue to soar – especially on weekends and almost exclusively in Black neighborhoods.

She’s blaming the mayhem on weak gun control regulations, and promising that things will get better soon. So far, things are only getting worse. For example:

Mass shooting on the west side…

Click here.

This mother is fed up and leaving…

Click here.

Two mass killings in the same neighborhood…

Click here.

 

DISTURBING: The UN’s Idea of Sex Education for Children 

It’s Perfectly Normal, a US government-funded, UN-produced sex-education curriculum for grammar school children, contains “graphic depictions of children engaging in masturbation and various sexual acts,” according to Sharon Slater, co-founder and president of advocacy group Family Watch International.

For slightly older children, ages 12 to 14, the curriculum encourages children to “share their sexual feelings” through activities including oral and anal sex, masturbation, or touching each other’s genitals while saying “I like you.”

In addition, the curriculum encourages children to label themselves with sexual identities and needs. Example: I am a “polyamorous queer teen who needs to know how to have safe sex and relationships with multiple partners.”

“We’re seeing it in almost all the schools,” Slater said. “And now under President Biden, they’ve even increased the budget to $130 million.”

 Click here.

 

GOOD: Teenage Americans Are Having Less Sex 

Notwithstanding the above, American high schoolers are having less sex today than they’ve been having since the early 1990s.

According to the most recent (2019) biannual edition of Youth Risk Behavior Survey, administered by the CDC, 38.4% of high schoolers reported having had intercourse. This is down from 46% in 2009 and 54% in 1991.

What’s perhaps most encouraging is the decline in Black teens having sex. It’s down to 42.3% from 81.5% in 1991.

 

BAD: Twitter Is At It Again… 

Twitter recently suspended several accounts dedicated to reporting on 2020 election audits.

One, the Audit War Room, had 40,000 followers. Another, the Maricopa County Audit, had 100,000.

Twitter’s actions came just a week after Ken Bennett, the liaison and a former Republican Arizona Secretary of State, announced that he had been blocked from entering the audit.

Want to know more about Twitter’s campaign against news and views it disagrees with? Click here.

Or here.

Or here.

 

IRONIC: Violence Prevention Chief Gets Robbed 

And it happens on air!

Click here.

 

GOOD: Michigan Legislature Repeals Governor’s Emergency Powers Act 

Michigan has repealed the Emergency Powers Act used by Governor Whitmer to implement COVID-19 restrictions in the state. (The governor had agreed to end the lockdown several times early last year, but reneged, citing her authority under the Act.)

The Senate vote came two days after the state Board of Canvassers certified that Unlock Michigan, a coalition of state residents, had obtained more than the required 340,000 valid signatures to put a repeal proposition before the voters at the next general election.

Click here.

 

BAD: Cop Tasers Kid in Girlfriend’s Yard 

This Florida Highway patrolman tases a kid in the backyard of his girlfriend’s house because he “looked suspicious.” As the commentator says, teenage boys have been at the backdoors of their paramours since Romeo and Juliet. What made this particular kid look suspicious? Could it be that he was biracial?

You decide. Click here.

 

HYPOCRITICAL: Defund-the-Police Advocate Cori Bush Spends Campaign Funds for Personal Security 

Here’s the story.

And here she is defending herself.

Continue Reading