Someone Who Did for Others… 

After reading Gellhorn’s letter, I found it interesting to read this amazing story.

From The Epoch Times

 

“How Much Can One Person Really Do” 

Ever wonder how much one person can do against – well, everything?

In Nazi-occupied Poland, one Polish woman once saved 400 lives. Her name was Irena Sendler.

When Nazis forced the Jews into Polish ghettos during World War II, Irena came into contact with many Jews due to her occupation as a social worker.

Despite the overwhelming pressure of her political environment, Sendler soon joined Żegota, the Council to Aid Jews, and began to use her job as a cover to smuggle Jewish orphans to safety. After they got out of the ghetto, Sendler would arrange for the orphans to stay with other families or in convents.

Eventually, as the living situation in the ghetto deteriorated and more and more Jews were sent off to camps, Sendler and her associates began smuggling out children from Jewish families as well. She would keep track of each child’s true identity before forging them false ones, burying all the records in a jar so that the parents could reunite with their children one day.

Unfortunately, many of these parents would not survive the concentration camps. But because of Sendler, their children would.

By the end of World War II, Sendler and her colleagues managed to save around 2,500 Jewish children. Of these 2,500, about 400 were rescued by Sendler herself.

Every Friday, Merriam-Webster posts the words that, for one reason or another, defined the week. The list was especially interesting last week. Click here to read it.

“The only rock I know that stays steady, the only institution I know that works, is the family.” – Lee Iacocca

So… You’re Thinking About a Family Reunion? 

Pre-COVID – for more than 30 years, every other year – K and I have sponsored a family gathering of about 40 people. There have always been three generations present. (We might have four next time we do it, if K’s mom comes!)

We call it a “Cousin Camp,” because the original idea was to help all our nieces and nephews get to know one another. (I have about a dozen cousins and never knew any of them.)

I’m happy to say that goal was accomplished. And at the same time, we’ve kept our own generation in better touch. Plus, we’ve had lots of great adventures.

What We Learned 

Let me just tell you some of what we’ve done and what I thought were the pluses and minuses.

What we did: Our first Cousin Camp was in a seaside resort in New England. We rented two houses, next to each other, across from the beach and a quarter mile from town. The good thing about staying in one place for a week is that it’s generally less expensive than being on the move. But there was a bit of an issue about who’s making the mess and who’s cleaning it up, if you know what I mean. Takeaway: Don’t leave the quotidian work to chance. Plan to have it fairly distributed.

What we did: We did a Cousin Camp at an island resort run by one of those tour companies that offered a plethora of outdoor activities. Every day was something else. The younger people had a blast. Some of the older people faded as time passed. A winter Cousin Camp we had in a Colorado ski resort was enjoyed by all, at least in part because there were lots of activities for people of every age and energy capacity. Takeaway: Consider total daily energy requirements when planning the itinerary.

What we did: We did a cruise to Alaska that had the same benefit. (Cruise ships tend to have far more activities than you can possibly do.) But an even bigger plus: The parents never had to worry about where their children were because they had supervised activities practically 24/7. Takeaway: Toddlers require constant attention. Give their parents a break if you want them to feel like they are on vacation.

What we did: The past several Cousin Camps have been mobile, featuring hiking, biking, and rafting in US national parks and in Canada. The downside of trips like this was that we had to pack up and move on every day or two. The upside was that everyone got to experience a wonderful part of America they might not have otherwise. Takeaway:Consider novel locations.

What We Learned (in Short) 

* You need activities. You can’t just hang out together all the time. Planned activities are better. Having guides that plan and direct the activities is better still. But get involved in the planning, so you can make sure that they include everyone.

* The activities should be varied. They should include physical activities like mountain climbing or biking or skiing, but they should also include learning activities like bird spotting or farm tours or cooking classes. Also important: activities for those that can’t or don’t want to participate in the group activities.

* Anything you can do to encourage people to try things they’ve never done before is generally a good idea – so long as you provide equally interesting secondary options to kick back and do nothing.

* Getting everyone together at least once a day is important. The idea, after all, is that you are a family. So find at least one activity that everyone does together. For us, it’s always been dinner. During the day, our family of 40 might break up into 3 or 4 smaller groups, but everyone comes together at dinner.

* Don’t be embarrassed to try silly family activities like karaoke or talent shows. I am not a fan of these sorts of things, but I (and others like me) discovered we enjoyed them.

* If you can afford to hire professionals to help you plan the itinerary and guide you, do it.

I can’t think of anything I’ve ever invested in that has given my family a greater return than our Cousin Camps. If you like the idea of creating deeper connections among your extended family, I’m 90% sure you will have the same experience. And considering all the travel deals out there these days, this is a good time to at least start exploring the possibilities.

On the subject of family getaways today, you might be interested to know that Rancho Santana has just won another award. (Click here and look under the award for Best Family Hotel.)

Old Men Having Fun

I’ve mentioned my Myrtle Beach Golf Club before. Once a small group of friends, mostly high school buddies, we spend a fun week every year in Myrtle Beach golfing. And our connection continues all year long via group email.

The conversations are good natured and redundant. They center on what my kids (and, I’m sure, their kids) call “Old Man Humor.” The routine is as follows: One of us (usually JM) posts a joke or cartoon that is some combination of corny, crude, and/or nostalgic. This is immediately followed by a rush of what, in our era, we called ball busting: i.e., ad hominem reactions.

Recently, a new topic was introduced: our increasingly rapid physical and intellectual senescence.

I’m not sure why I’m sharing this with you. It is disgusting. But also – if you are a coeval of ours – informative.

First, from JM, there was news about the Toto Wellness Toilet – the “best in health” winner at the CES 2021 consumer tech showcase in Las Vegas – which uses “multiple cutting-edge sensing technologies” to scan your body and your “key outputs” each time you sit on the toilet. It then analyzes your waste and suggests dietary changes through a mobile app.

And then, from KK, there was this:

“Speaking of shit, I just read some good news about FIT, which stands for fecal immunochemical test. You are sent a small cardboard mailer containing equipment and instructions for taking a stool sample and returning the test to a lab…. A week or so later, the results show up on an online patient portal….

“No starving and shitting your brains out, no need to skip work or find someone to drive you home after anesthesia, no colonoscopy!”

I will spare you the comments from the group that have followed.

Ridiculous as these particular examples sound, new product ideas are essential to the success of a growing company. The trick, of course, is to come up with products that have a good chance of making it in the marketplace.

And that brings me to today’s essay – an excerpt from the upcoming new and revised edition of Ready, Fire, Aim.

“New ideas pass through three periods: (1) It can’t be done. (2) It probably can be done, but it’s not worth doing. (3) I knew it was a good idea all along!” – Arthur C. Clarke

 

If Ready… Fire… Aim Is the Right Idea

What Does Ready Mean? 

Ready, Fire, Aim is my recommended strategy for starting a new business. Most people understand the basic idea: Don’t wait to launch until everything is perfect. There will be time for refining the details later. For every business that fails because of inadequate preparation, nine fail because procrastination.

In a previously published essay on this topic, I argued that the first and most important responsibility of a founder or CEO in launching a business is to move as quickly as possible from the initial idea to a profitable sale. What most wannabe entrepreneurs do instead is spend months and sometimes years in research and development – trying to get everything perfect – before they try to make the first sale.

One of the most important lessons I learned about entrepreneurship was from JSN, a brilliant businessman. He said, “a business isn’t a business until you make your first successful sale. Until then, it’s just an expensive, time-consuming hobby.”

If you can grok that, you can understand that starting a business is always a race against time. You begin with an idea, a certain amount of dollars, and your confidence in the idea. Then you get to work, fueled by these limited resources. It’s a long race, a race in stages, but the finish line of the first step is very simple. It is making your first profitable sale.

Every new business begins with two essential ingredients: an idea and the ambition to make that idea real.

Both are necessary. The ambition must be strong. And the idea must be good. If the ambition is weak, the start-up will fail before the idea is tested. But if the idea is bad, no amount of ambition will make the business succeed.

Anyone interested enough in entrepreneurship to be reading this far, has ambition. Whether that ambition stays or grows or fades depends to a great degree on the “goodness” of the idea.

 

How Can You Tell – Before You Start Spending Your Time and Money – If Your Idea Is Any Good? 

The easiest way to start a new business is to work for several years for a successful company in an industry that appeals to you, learn how they do what they do, and then develop a version of one of their best-selling products that you can make either cheaper or better.

When you take that approach, you are beginning with a proven concept – a product idea that you know, for sure, is in demand. In trying to make your version better – by making it more useful, more appealing, or less expensive – you may err. But because the product is already proven, you should be able to correct that error fairly quickly by testing alternatives.

If you are starting a business about which you have little or no knowledge and experience, the task of figuring out if your idea is a good one is much tougher.

Here are some things you can do…

  1. Assess the size of the market.

If you have been working in an industry for several years – and especially if you‘ve been in a sales or marketing role for several years – you should have a good idea of how big the market for your product is. If you are new to the industry, this kind of information is not difficult to find.

Also find out the average size of the companies that comprise the industry. In most industries, there are three levels: 3 to 5 businesses at the top whose revenues comprise about half of the entire industry, a dozen or two in the middle, and many in the third tier.

What you are looking for is a market in which that second tier is a size you believe you can reach. Information marketing, for example, the industry I’ve spent the most time in, is probably a $10 billion industry (excluding the mainstream news media and book publishing). The six or seven industry leaders, including two of my clients, have total revenues of about $4 billion. (Only one is above $1 billion. The rest are about half that.) In the second tier, there are about a dozen companies between $100 million and $300 million, for a total of about $2.5 billion. And then there is a third tier of perhaps 500 businesses with revenues of $10 million to $50 million that comprise the other $3.5 billion.

Your chances of getting into that top tier in fewer than 20 years are not strong. If you would be happy getting into that second tier, with revenues between $100 million and $300 million, your chances are not great, but it is possible. Your chances of getting into that third tier, though – with revenues in the $10 million to $50 million range – should be good.

You have to ask yourself if you are satisfied with those odds. If not, you should consider another industry.

 

  1. Assess the strength of the industry. 

You want to enter an industry that is growing. The faster, the better. A rising tide lifts all ships – and most especially the small ones.

The industry I mentioned above – the digital information industry – was microscopic in the late 1990s. For us, back then, it was not much more than an academic exercise. We wanted to learn a bit about it in case it took off.

It did take off, and for the next 10 to 15 years the growth was spectacular. The revenues of my largest client rose by more than 10 times, from $100 million to more than $1.5 billion. Some of the smaller businesses I owned and/or advised grew even  more spectacularly. A few of them grew by more than 100 times.

During those early years, all you had to do to succeed was vaguely imitate what we were doing. And hundreds of companies did. Experience and expertise were helpful, but not necessary. And there were hundreds of businesses that became large businesses with initial capitalizations of just a few thousand dollars.

That time is past. The digital information industry is still growing, but at mature rates. To break into it now, you’d need to know what you are doing and have a bankroll of hundreds of thousands of dollars – at the very least.

 

  1. Look for a marketing advantage. 

Example: I was an early investor in a business that intended to sell shaving razors. There were two or three companies that dominated the market, and dozens more chasing their leads. Trying to compete with them would have been a long stretch, but the founder of this new business wasn’t interested in that. He wanted to market to the upper end with high-quality razors selling for hundreds of dollars.

So our business plan was designed accordingly. We would market directly to wealthy investors (a market we had access to) and move from there.

It was a slow start, but our marketing advantage (not only direct access to buyers but also expertise in direct marketing) allowed the founder and his team to fuel some early growth.  As the years passed, adjustments were made. The business is now profitable and looking promising. (In fact, I just invested in it again to get it to the next level.)

 

  1. Assess the strength of your USP. 

The USP (unique selling proposition) is the idea you have about how to distinguish your business and its lead products from the competition.

You can get a good idea of its uniqueness by doing a Google search of the main players and then reviewing their advertising materials. (Don’t worry about the little players. They won’t be your competition.) But prepare to be surprised. I can’t tell you how many great USPs I’ve drummed up over the years, only to find that there was nothing new or unique about them.

If your USP is unique, you still have to answer this question: Is it strong? Strong enough to give you a significant marketing advantage? And there is no way to determine this objectively, because none of the big boys (the companies that have proven they know how to sell their products) are using it.

This is where you turn to trial and error – i.e., “beta testing” your USP.

If, for example, you want to start a cookie company and your USP is some sort of super-duper chocolate chip cookie, you can easily beta test that by selling your cookies at local festivals and green markets. What you are looking for with such tests are strongly positive responses. A modestly positive approach to your USP is not enough to bet your time and money on – no matter how much you believe in it. If the market says, “It’s nice,” go back to the kitchen.

 

  1. Ask yourself: “Are my sales targets realistic?” 

Your product idea is useful. It provides a big and easily expressed benefit to your customer. There is a good-sized market for it, and you have a USP that you have tested with positive results. Now it’s time to double-check your original calculations.

* Reconsider your estimate of market size based on what you learned from your beta testing. You may have discovered, for example, that your product works very well to one sector, but not at all to another. Make that adjustment.

* Reconsider your sales conversion targets. Based on whatever research and testing you were able to do, recalculate your sell-through rates. Let’s say your original projection, based on research or intuition, was closing one out of five sales efforts. In the beta test, you closed only one out of seven. Make that adjustment.

* Reconsider refunds and chargebacks. Often, in our enthusiasm for a new business idea, we have unrealistic expectations about the percentage of customers that may request a refund, or we fail to consider that some percentage of credit card payments will be charged back to you for lack of funds. Again, based on what you’ve learned in this initial stage, make that adjustment.

 

  1. Create 3 spreadsheets. 

Based on the numbers you’ve come up with so far, create 3 spreadsheets: one that is optimistic, one that is realistic, and one that is pessimistic.

The optimistic spreadsheet should come from the numbers you have been left with after double-checking all your estimates, calculations, and expectations.

For the realistic spreadsheet, take your optimistic numbers and make them about 20% to 30% worse. This may feel like a pessimistic calculation at this point. Trust me, it’s not. At best, this is a realistic calculation.

Then, for your pessimistic spreadsheet, take your realistic spreadsheet and make those numbers worse by another 20% to 30%. This spreadsheet, with numbers that are roughly half of what you think of as realistic, is the pessimistic expectation of what the business might do.

 

  1. Be pessimistic. 

The next step is a difficult one, but it has to be done. You should now take your optimistic spreadsheet (the one that you probably believe is actually realistic) and throw it away. Then take the next 3 steps based on your numbers from the realistic and pessimistic spreadsheets.

 

  1. Ask yourself: “Do I know the tasks that need to be done to launch the business?” 

Before you put ay business idea into action, it pays to create a short list of the primary tasks that need to be completed.

Such a list needn’t be elaborately detailed, and it shouldn’t take more than a few hours to put together. But it could prove very useful in identifying obstacles, estimating costs, and – most important – determining the team you will eventually put in charge of the product.

 

  1. Ask yourself: “Can I do these jobs myself?” And, if not: “Do I have great people that can do them?” 

Every great idea needs great people to make it succeed. So before you move into action on any significant business idea, stop to ask yourself, “Who can help me get this done?”

Start by choosing a primary champion for the main idea – a person you think has the personality to get the idea actualized. A champion must (a) believe in the idea, (b) have the authority to execute it, and (c) have the experience to make wise decisions along the way. If you have no champion and no time to champion the idea yourself, it may be better to postpone implementing it.

In addition to a primary champion, a good idea may need other talented people to play key roles. Who can produce the product? Who can test it in the marketplace? Who can be in charge of fulfillment and operations?

At this early point in time, it’s not necessary to have a full roster of support people. But you should at least know who your champion will be and have some idea about who will be your supplier/producer, marketer/seller, and fulfillment/operations person.

 

  1. Ask yourself: “Do I have a Plan B, an exit plan, in case my good idea turns out to be a bad one?” 

Sometimes (not often, but sometimes) everything is there. The idea is good, it feels right, it tests well, and it has good people behind it. Yet the product falls on its face when you roll it out. If you have a Plan B – a “What if it fails?” plan – rather than being blindsided by such an unlikely event, you will be much better prepared to act.

Like other aspects of “getting ready,” developing a good Plan B doesn’t need to take a lot of time. Details can be easily worked out later if you know what your get-out strategy is before you start.

The key to making a Plan B is to set stop-loss points at the outset – measurable points that determine, ahead of time, whether you will continue to invest money in the project or drop it.

Don’t make the mistake of thinking that failure won’t ever happen to you. I can tell you stories about great projects that failed: a seemingly brilliant idea for a new record club that cost one of my clients $125,000… a “can’t-miss” celebrity health newsletter that lost $780,000 before we gave up on it… and a magazine that was going to make millions that cost us millions instead.

I remember reading that when Ted Turner was planning CNN, he found that he had done such a good job promoting the idea that his partners and top executives weren’t willing to even entertain the idea that it might not work. Since he knew full well the value of being prepared, he kept asking the question “What if it fails?” until his associates gave in and put together a fallback plan.

CNN started off terrifically – and when the company hit financial problems seven years later, they already had a solution. In this case, it was to sell a portion of the business to cable operators. Turner’s early insistence on a Plan B allowed the crisis to be overcome without anyone breaking a sweat.

My longtime friend and colleague Bob Bly wrote a note about the use of listicles (numbered lists) in marketing copy and editorial content.

He points out that they can work quite well, for 3 reasons: They are easy to read, easy to write, and the number in the headline arouses the reader’s curiosity. However, he says, since the rise of the internet, their use has exploded. And as a result, they don’t pack the punch they did decades ago, when they stood out from most of the copy being written back then.

His advice? Use them… but infrequently.

“Use numbered lists in your copy where they fit best,” Bob says, “for example, presenting a group of disparate product advantages. But in other promotions, there are many headline formats that can be more powerful and attention-getting…. Click here to sample a few dozen alternatives.” ​

As always, Bob is right.

I have an additional thought: Listicles are good if you are looking for clicks, but single-topic essays are right when you want to convert someone to a follower.

The Spy Who Came In From the Cold 

By John le Carré

256 pages

Published January 1, 1963 by Coward-McCann

This was the Mules’ January book selection. As I’m writing this, we haven’t yet met, so I can’t report on the members’ opinions, but I suspect they will be positive.

About a year after the Berlin Wall was erected, Leamas, a British agent, at the end of a long and difficult career where he has seen all of his operatives killed by the Communists, is sent to East Germany to bring down Hans Dietr Mundt, an important East German intelligence officer, by posing as a defector and “divulging” false information insinuating that Mundt is a traitor to the East Germans.

Of course, few things go as planned. Especially in this genre of fiction. There are surprises in store – for Leamus and for the reader – almost every other page, including a fateful love affair, the continual appearance of entertaining secondary characters, and lots of twists and turns in the action, topped off by one major surprise at the end.

As a spy novel, The Spy Who Came In From the Cold was fully satisfying. Two things, however, make it better than genre fiction.

At one level, it is a critique of the Cold War and the questionable tactics Western governments used in competing with the Russians.

At another level, it is a critique of ideological thinking per se – and how it lends itself to all sorts of useless and destructive actions that could not and did not make any sense in the light of reason.

In fact, some of the most enjoyable parts of the book, for me, were a series of conversations between Leamas and Fiedler, an East German spy, on their respective life views and career motivations.

The novel received critical acclaim at the time of its publication and became an international bestseller. It was selected as one of the 100 All-Time Best Novels by Time magazine.

From J.B. Priestly: “Superbly constructed, with an atmosphere of chilly hell.”

From The Guardian: “Le Carré handles the unspooling web of narrative and motive with exemplary poise.”

The Spy Who Came In From the Cold (1965)

Directed by Martin Ritt

Starring Richard Burton, Claire Bloom, and Oskar Werner 

More often than not, movies made from books make lots of changes. Characters are eliminated. Dialog is deleted and/or simplified, and often the denouements are altered to appeal to the movie crowd. That is not the case with the movie version of The Spy Who Came In From the Cold. The plot is nearly identical. The characters are the same. And the dialog, as near as I could tell, is word-for-word.

With all that good stuff preserved from the book, I had positive expectations. And, indeed, there are lots of cinematic elements to admire. The cinematography is brilliant – the images, the angles – the lighting (B&W) is evocative, and the settings were designed perfectly for the action.

But I was disappointed. The plot of the book was tense, fast-paced, and emotionally gripping. In the movie, it is not. There were moments when I couldn’t understand why certain characters did what they did or said what they said. I didn’t have that feeling reading the book. And the acting ranged from adequate to opaque. This was especially evident with the lead, the great Richard Burton, whose character and motivations were obscured by an over-reliance on scowling. There was none of the charm in Burton’s performance that was evident in the book. I blame all that on the director. Everything the director is responsible for, including the acting, was a bit overdone.

It is not a bad movie. It is certainly better than many. I would recommend it. But don’t expect to be awestruck.

You can watch the trailer here.

From Slant Magazine: “A fabulous, distinctive movie that revels in the precision and density of conversation as warfare.”

From The New York Times, Bosley Crowther: “The film makes you believe it could have happened. And that’s the remarkable thing.”