I’m doing a final revision of my fourth book of poetry…

I’m doing a final revision of my fourth book of poetry. It’s called Now and Then: New and Improved Poems.

I am happy with the title. Is it snarky? I’m not sure. Right now, I like it.

This is probably the 30th revision. For me, poetry is 90% revision. That’s literally true. I checked this last draft against the first. Only 10% of the original words remain.

Some of these poems, as the title suggests, have been published previously. Normally, one doesn’t change a previously published poem. But I did. Over and over again. What’s happened is that some of the poems I no longer recognize as mine. I don’t remember the plots. I don’t recognize the characters.

But that just makes it easier to critique them. They have come from elsewhere. They are newly formed into something apart from me. And that makes the consumption of them more satisfying.

Like the following poem… I am sure my interlocutor was once a real person. I don’t recognize her anymore, but I like the person she became.

Continue Reading

Passing the Pink House in Winter

With Unmitigated Joy 

 

What I loved about you then was your profile –

how you were always looking out into some

middle distance. When I would speak to you it

was difficult to know if you were even listening.

It was the side of your face I knew and your

half-amused, half-transported smile. It was

beautiful to see, and impossible to fathom.

 

It was a lot – a lot more than I was used to – but it

wasn’t enough. We met after the fall and you left at

the end of the winter.

 

Much later, reading your journal, I discovered how,

when we walked every evening to the gas station to

buy cigarettes and beer, you were thinking about

that sign in front of the pink house, advertising

fortune telling. You said you imagined her customers

to be a menagerie of people like us, “lost souls,

worried about the future.” You said people are like

sailors looking for patterns in a clear night’s sky,

“irradiated by a billion, glittering galaxies.”

 

I remember one cold afternoon as we passed the

pink house, you noticed a squirrel had made its way

down from a nearby tree, across the snowy yard and

up and onto the sign. It was sitting there looking

back and forth, as if it were worried. You asked me

what I thought it was doing. I said it was doing what

squirrels always do. You asked what that was. I said

I didn’t know. “I guess it’s looking for food.”

 

In your journal you wrote, “It was then that I

realized the squirrel was somehow the Chosen One.

It had perched on the sign not because it was a sign,

but because it was hungry.” You said that the squirrel

“didn’t need signs, for what it had was hunger.”

You said, “Everything more than that is a burden.

Hunger is enough.”

 

If I knew then what I know now, I could have told

you that I had that hunger, but it was not enough.

Continue Reading

I had a good laugh watching this video of Ben Shapiro’s reaction to Rep. Emanuel Cleaver (D-MO) politically correct prayer at the opening of the 1st session of the 117th Congress on Sunday.

In case you missed it, Cleaver (who is an ordained minister) ended the prayer by saying, “Amen. And A-women.”

Cleaver was making a playful reference to Nancy Pelosi and James McGovern’s proposal of a new rules package regarding the use of “gender-inclusive language” in the House. But Shapiro took him seriously and called it the single stupidest thing he’d ever heard. He explained that the word “amen” is derived from Hebrew via Greek and Latin, and its meaning has nothing to do with men. What he did not explain is that the words “man” and “men” are derived from Old English, have their roots in German, and meant, even back then, “person” and “people.”

The war on words has had a long history of incredibly stupid causes – every bit as stupid as a-woman. That’s because the war on words is a political war, a war for power. And if you are a politician ,you must abide by the golden rule of politics: The ends justify the means.

Number Two Son made fun of my laughter, saying, “Boy, you Conservatives are like snowflakes when it comes to language.”

I said, “As you know from reading your George Orwell, words matter. Words matter because words influence thought. And thought influences political ideas. And political ideas are the keys to power.”

Continue Reading