I slept and dreamt
that life was joy.
I awoke and saw
that life was duty.
I worked – and behold,
duty was joy.

– Rabindranath Tagore

 

Work, Hunger, Give

How to Enjoy Life in the Real World 

For some time now in America there has been a gradual rise of a sort of popular science of happiness that is fundamentally flawed.

It is epitomized in the bestselling book and movie Eat, Pray, Love. The book/movie, you may remember, is about a 34-year-old writer who suddenly becomes unhappy with her affluent life… decides it’s her husband’s fault… divorces him… and then spends a year in Italy (eating), India (praying), and Bali (recuperating?), where she finds what her life was lacking: a younger, handsomer, richer, and more exotic version of the man she divorced.

It’s a great title. But in terms of the idea behind it, it should have been called Live Like a Hedonist. Think Like a Fatalist. Act Like a Solipsist.

Hedonism, in the contemporary sense, is the idea that happiness comes from filling oneself with all the luxurious things life has to offer – gourmet food, fine wine, exotic experiences, etc.

Fatalism, to the modern mind, is represented in the adolescent notion that happiness can be achieved by finding one’s soul mate and discovering one’s passion.

Solipsism has infested itself into virtually every corner of popular modern psychology – the belief that happiness starts from taking the time to pay attention to and love oneself.

In Eat, Pray, Love – and a thousand TV shows, magazine articles, etc. – we are given blueprints on how to apply these ideas to rid ourselves of doubts and anxieties and bouts of depression and become our “best selves.”

We all know or have known people whose weltanschauung is filtered through these notions. They are called adolescents.

Adolescence is a stage of life where children move from 11 or 12 years of being cared for to adulthood, where they have to take care of themselves. Adolescence is mostly about the freedom to make mistakes and suffer the consequences. This is why, for most of us, adolescence is so painful.

But there are some for whom their teenage years are not painful, but graceful and easy. These are the “privileged” few whose parents, for whatever reason, have decided to continue to baby their babies forever.

This results in 20- and 30-year-olds that act like adolescents – spoiled, self-centered, and incapable of fending for themselves. You know them by the behaviors they exhibit:

* An extraordinary lack of self-awareness, leading to…

* An unconscious sense of entitlement about almost everything, leading to…

* Putting themselves at the head of every line…

* Inserting themselves in the midst of every conversation…

* Assuming that their problems are uniquely challenging and should be a grave concern for others.

Properly raised adults know that life doesn’t work that way. Having suffered through adolescence, they are able to move into the workforce, get married, and have children, with the realistic expectation that all of these experiences will be difficult.

Life, they have learned, is not meant to be an uninterrupted pleasure cruise. For those that have thought seriously about the matter, the central question is not how to best enjoy life, but rather how to get through it with the least amount of suffering.

This is, of course, a central tenet of Buddhism and an issue that has been dealt with by every important moral philosopher, starting with Aristotle.

For Albert Camus, for example, “to decide whether life is worth living is to answer the fundamental question of philosophy.” Every other question, he wrote in The Myth of Sisyphus, is “child’s play.”

For Rabindranath Tagore, life was a duty, an obligation – and happiness came as a result of  meeting that obligation. (See excerpt from one of his poems at the top.)

In Yes to Life: In Spite of Everything, Viktor Frankl, expanding on Tagore’s idea, noted that the happiness in life “cannot be pursued, cannot be ‘willed into being’ as joy; rather, it must arise spontaneously….  Happiness should not, must not, and can never be a goal, but only an outcome.”

Over many years of failing to achieve happiness through gluttony, hedonism, and fatalism, I’ve discovered what most of the moral philosophers have always said: Not only can happiness not be (in Frankl’s words) “willed into being,” it can only be achieved by focusing outside of the self.

What I’ve learned so far (and I’m still learning) is that there are three distinct types of activities that bring happiness without fail. Instead of Eat, Pray, Love, they are Work, Hunger, and Give.

 

Work

Instead of searching for the career that you are passionate about… or for some person or entity (such as the government) to end your suffering… get to work on doing something – anything – that is about someone or something other than you. Stop blaming fate for your troubles. Stop blaming others for your fate. Take responsibility for the person you are and the place you find yourself.

Forget all the things you hate about your job. Focus on doing a better job, on becoming a better worker, on working to make the lives of everyone you work with and for better.

Rather than spending your time complaining about all the ways you are victimized by society, work on improving the society you actually live in.

 

Hunger

This is a realization that came to me only recently. And it came from keeping a journal. I would read my journal from time to time for the particular purpose of discovering what sort of activities made me happy. One was practicing Jiu Jitsu. Another was reading a new book. A third was practicing the French horn. The common denominator was learning. I discovered that I am happy when I am learning.

Learning is the opposite of gluttony. Learning is a hunger for knowledge – a hunger to have new experiences and develop new skills. Feasting on things like food or comfort or luxury gives a momentary sense of pleasure that is inevitably followed by a longer period of physical and/or spiritual dullness and, often, by self-recriminations and regret. Feasting on learning brings continued and long-lasting pleasure.

 

Give

Instead of looking to be loved and to surround yourself with people that love you, look to give love to everyone around you.

Instead of always striving to increase your personal wealth, spend some time striving to give it away responsibly.

Instead of conniving to get the better of the hundreds of big and little negotiations in your life, use your smarts to make sure that the other person gets what he or she needs.

Do all of the above, and you will not only discover that you actually like what you do and who you are… you may even attract the person who ends up being your soulmate.

Continue Reading

Suggestion…

If you enjoy film, fiction, and casual philosophical conversations, I have a suggestion for you and some of your like-minded friends. (This is something I did recently with The Mules, my book club.)

First: Read Julio Cortázar’s short story, “Blow-Up.” (30 minutes)

Second: Watch Michelangelo Antonioni’s film, Blow-Up. (90 minutes)

Third: Watch Francis Ford Coppola’s film, The Conversation. (90 minutes)

Antonioni’s film is based on the  Cortázar short story. The Conversation is a clever adaptation of the Antonioni film.

Fourth: Discuss.

* What the heck is the short story about, anyway?

* How did Antonioni’s film adhere to and depart from Cortázar’s story?

* How is Coppola’s version like Cortázar’s story and how is it like Antonioni’s film?

* Blow-Up, the short story, is about direct observation; Blow-Up, the movie, is about photography; The Conversation is about audio recording. What is the common theme?

* Which did you like better, and why?

Continue Reading

Blow-Up: And Other Stories

By Julio Cortázar

288 Pages

Published 1985 by Pantheon Books

Interesting Fact: In addition to his stories, poetry, and novels, Cortázar published a graphic novel in 1975 titled Fantomas vs. The Multinational Vampires.

From Saturday Review: “Cortázar displays throughout his stories the ability to elevate them above the condition of those gimmicky tales which depend for effect solely on a twist ending. His genius here lies in the knack for constructing striking, artistically ‘right’ subordinate circumstances out of which his fantastic and metaphysical whimsies appear normally to spring.”

From Time Magazine: “[Cortázar] is a unique storyteller. He can induce the kind of chilling unease that strikes like a sound in the night.”

Continue Reading

Blow-Up (1966)

Directed by Michelangelo Antonioni

Starring David Hemmings, Vanessa Redgrave, Sarah Miles, and Jane Birkin

From Roger Ebert: “A hypnotic conjuring act, in which a character is awakened briefly from a deep sleep of bored alienation and then drifts away again. This is the arc of the film. Not ‘Swinging London.’ Not existential mystery. Not the parallels between what Hemmings does with his photos and what Antonioni does with Hemmings. But simply the observations that we are happy when we are doing what we do well, and unhappy seeking pleasure elsewhere. I imagine Antonioni was happy when he was making this film.”

From Rotten Tomatoes: “Exquisitely shot and simmering with unease, Michelangelo Antonio’s Blow-Up is an enigma that invites audiences to luxuriate in the sensual atmosphere of 1960s London chic.”

 

 

The Conversation (1974)

Directed by Francis Ford Coppola

Starring Gene Hackman, John Cazale, and Harrison Ford

From Emanuel Levy: “This is one of Coppola’s masterpieces, a prophetic film about paranoia, the growing role of technology in our daily lives, and the impossibility of privacy even in public spaces.”

From Rotten Tomatoes: “This tense, paranoid thriller presents Francis Ford Coppola at his finest – and makes some remarkably advanced arguments about technology’s role in society that still resonate today.”

Continue Reading

I can’t stop!

When I retired 10 years ago (for the fourth time), I promised myself (and swore to K) that I would desist from starting any new business ventures.

I did my best. Since then, I’ve started only about 10 – one per year. I secretly believe I should get a medal for my restraint. When you have never started a biz, it seems like a daunting task. But after you’ve started a few, all the fear is gone. You feel like making a business out of every cockamamie idea that springs into your head.

K and I renewed our vows on October 6. And in the 60-odd days that have passed since then, I haven’t started a single business. Not one.

I have, however, started a few projects. The most recent involves some of the amazing people that I know at Rancho Santana in Nicaragua.

One is a practicing nurse, real estate developer, teacher, author, entrepreneur, mother, grandmother, etc. She is, I think, 84.

Another is a former Nicaraguan debutante who fell in love with a US Marine who was guarding the embassy here 70-odd years ago, was sent to a convent to get her away from him, walked away from her wealth and status to marry him, raised three children, divorced him, started a dozen businesses, had all sorts of fascinating political and romantic entanglements, and recently took the old bastard back because he had no other place to go. She is 87.

The third is younger. At a mere 75 years old, he has spent his life as an itinerant artist, surfer, and sailor. He has traveled the world, and paid his way by selling his art for food, clothing, and lodging. He has sailed the seven seas, danced with beautiful natives in Bali, survived sea storms and shipwrecks, cancer, and gunplay, and is hard to get hold of because he’s always on to his next adventure.

So, I’m going to make a movie about them. It’s going to be called Triptych. I don’t expect to be able to sell too many copies of it, but I’m super-excited about the chance to record their amazing lives for prosperity.

Compared to starting a business, this is going to be a piece of cake. It should be doable in about a year. We’ll see if that’s realistic.

Continue Reading

3 Facts, 3 Numbers, 3 Thoughts 

THE FACTS 

* In Thailand, texters use 555 the way we use LOL. The number 5 is pronounced “ha” – which makes 555 “hahaha.”

* When an actor is in character, his brain patterns change. A study by Canada’s McMaster University had actors connected to brain-scanning equipment answer questions as themselves and as the characters they were currently playing. The results showed a significant difference depending on who was answering the question.

* A pangram is a sentence that uses every letter of the alphabet. It’s commonly used to test equipment and to develop skills in handwriting, calligraphy, and typing. The most famous pangram: “The quick brown fox jumps over a lazy dog.” Another one: “The five boxing wizards jump quickly.” And another one: “Pack my box with five dozen liquor jugs.”

 

THE NUMBERS 

* 2,107 – the number of antisemitic incidents in the United States last year, according to the Anti-Defamation League. This was not only a 12% increase from the year before, but the highest number since the ADL began tracking the incidents in 1979.

* 96% – the amount of value (compared to gold) that the US dollar has lost since the Federal Reserve took over the US banking system in 1913.

* 6.55 trillion – the number of dollars spent by the government from October 2019 to September 30 of this year. Only half of that was offset by revenue, leaving us with a deficit of $3.13 trillion.

 

THE THOUGHTS 

* “Reading can teach you the best of what others already know. Reflection can teach you the best of what only you can know.” – James Clear

* “Education is the kindling of a flame, not the filling of a vessel.” – Socrates

* “The end result of long and difficult practice is the appearance of natural ease.” – Michael Masterson

Continue Reading

I’m Smiling!

For the past few weeks, our family’s charitable foundation in Nicaragua (run by Number Three Son Michael) has been focused almost exclusively on hurricane relief programs. Meanwhile, great progress has been made on the expansion and face lift of FunLimon.

What began as a knee-jerk response to evident need 20 years ago has matured into a robust educational and recreational community center with 21 full-time employees and 6 additional professional contract positions. The center proudly serves the local community – including 250 direct beneficiaries of its education outreach. This includes 100 kids for the youth program, 30 for the young adult college scholarship initiative, 40 for the vocational courses, and 20 in the adult PC training program.

Continue Reading

What Favorite Movies Can Tell You About Other People 

When the lights came on I noticed that my partner and his wife were seated just two rows behind us. They were both laughing.

“So, you liked it?” I asked.

“No!” he shouted, still laughing. “We hated it!”

The laughing didn’t make sense to me, but the fact that we had polar opposite reactions to the movie did.

I’ve often said that one of the primary but unrecognized purposes of the arts is to allow people to sort themselves into affinity groups that are not apparent from, say, a casual conversation. So I was greatly interested in a fascinating essay in Taki’s Magazine by its residential movie critic, Steve Sailer.

In “Are We What We Watch?” Sailer discusses a study that surveyed Facebook users and cross-referenced their responses with the movie preferences listed on their Facebook profiles. The researchers then categorized the information to assemble a personality profile for each participant based on the OCEAN model – an acronym for Openness to experience, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Agreeableness, and Neuroticism.

The study is surprisingly deep. Sailer looks at how a preference for certain movies can denote chauvinism or even the average age/gender of a movie’s fanbase. He goes on to explain how these attributes are calculated (there’s a lot more calculation involved than you’d think) and how an overall personality profile is constructed. You might even find yourself thinking “that makes sense” while learning, for example, that sports movies rank high in extraversion while Winona Ryder movies rank high in neuroticism.

The research is fascinating, and Sailer’s analysis is very insightful (given his movie knowledge). I encourage anyone with even a passing interest in movies and/or psychology to check out his article HERE.

Continue Reading

Happy Tuesday!

I’m feeling good right now because I just finished a meeting about moving forward with Rancho Santana: Then and Now.

This is a book project I’ve been working on for at least 10 years. The idea was to document the amazing history of this place, from when it was a cow farm till it became a five-star resort.

In the beginning, I tried to get my partners here involved in the publication. I thought they’d be interested, but they weren’t. So I put it aside for a while and then decided I would produce it myself. The story should be told.

I say “produce,” because books like this are major productions. The last one I did, Central American Modernism, took many years, involved dozens of contributors, and cost a quarter-million dollars to complete. It’s not like writing an ordinary book manuscript and then having a publisher edit, print, and sell it.

It’s really much more like making a movie. The “script” writer is about 60% done with the text. I just hired an assistant producer, who will help me hire a half-dozen other people – specialists in making a book like this come to fruition.

Re today’s issue… Get ready. It’s a video of a very exciting and out-of-the-ordinary Sumo wrestler.

Continue Reading