Just One Thing: How to Negotiate in One Lesson 

JSN, my ex-boss/then partner, was, in most ways, a great negotiator. He was aggressive, highly intelligent, and charming. That very rare combination of assets allowed him to get pretty much whatever he wanted out of every deal.

BB, my client/partner, is not considered to be a great – or even good – negotiator. He doesn’t claim to be. He doesn’t like negotiating, but he occasionally does negotiate. And when he does, he proves himself to be equally as charming and intelligent as JSN. But he is not aggressive. In fact, a typical “negotiation” with him might sound something like this:

Him: What do you think it’s worth?

You: Thirty percent.

Him. That seems reasonable.

Or…

Him: What do you think it’s worth?

You: Sixty percent.

Him. Oh, I couldn’t afford that.

And that’s it. Done. In the first case, you have a deal. In the second case, you don’t. And don’t try to come back by lowering the “ask.” He isn’t interested.

I sat beside JSN at the negotiating table for 11 years, and beside BB twice that long. I can say that JSN deserved his reputation as a master negotiator – but in the realm BB operates in, he is actually better.

The difference depends on understanding that in business there are two fundamentally different kinds of negotiation: transactional and relational.

JSN looked at almost every deal he made as a transaction. He had something of value to buy or something to sell, and the goal of the negotiation was to somehow come out on top.

BB eschews transactional deals. If they must be done, he appoints someone else to do them. But he does negotiate relational deals. He looks at them as… how shall I put it? As first dates. A negotiation for BB is an opportunity to discover if he and the other person could be good business partners.

In other words, JSN viewed business as a series of individual transactions. Success to him depended on being the winner in as many of these transactions as possible.

BB views business as a complex series of relationships. Success to him is hooking up with the right sort of people.

I learned lots of tricks from JSN that I employ when I am negotiating a one-time transaction, such as buying a car or a painting or a house. But in business, I prefer BB’s approach.

When I negotiate BB’s way, I have a chance to find out if I am compatible with the person on the other side of the table – i.e., if their idea of fairness is the same as mine.

A fair deal in relational negotiation is one that works well for both sides, and not just immediately but also in the future. That means I can’t go into the negotiation with a fixed, pre-determined outcome in mind. I have to be prepared to accept a deal that works not only for me but also for the other person.

There have been many times when the other person was willing to accept a deal that favored me. When that happened, I insisted that we structure a deal that was better for them. Not out of altruism, but because I realized that what matters most is not the immediate transaction but the long-term relationship.

When you are negotiating relationships, you have to think this way. If you don’t, one of two things will happen: The deal will not be made because the other person will feel you are bullying them… or they will accept the deal but later on feel that they were cheated.

In either case, the opportunity to forge a potentially profitable relationship for years to come will have been lost.

Remembering Harold Bloom 

On October 14, one of my heroes died. Harold Bloom was probably the best-known literary critic of my generation. His books and essays were erudite but accessible, insightful and witty, forthright but charming. He was a serious critic – miles above the intellectual drivel put out by most academic critics today. And, as you will read in this engaging obituary, he became a bit of a persona non grata at Yale when identity politics and what he called the school of resentment took over literary criticism.

But Bloom never buckled to the tyranny. And I’m hopeful that one day, when this fog of animus and stupidity clears, he will be recognized as one of the few in academia that kept his vision clear.

“Reading well is one of the great pleasures that solitude can afford you.” – Harold Bloom

churlish (adjective) 

Churlish (CHURL-ish) means rude, vulgar, surly. As used by Christopher Morley: “Happiness is surely the best teacher of good manners: only the unhappy are churlish in deportment.”

An email from RG:

Hey Mark, about a year ago you gave me some advice on a promo. Well, we just got final DM results back. We did a split mailing, and my 30,000 test won, doing 127% ROI to front end and 290% ROI to backend. That’s probably the best ROI of any DM this year.

Thanks for your help!

 

Unless it’s a family member calling, I rarely answer the phone. But once in a while, when I’m feeling saucy, I’ll pick up on a sales call. My favorites come from Mumbai by way of a local area code. I listen to the pitch and thank them for calling. I tell them I’ve just received an inheritance of many millions and I’m eager to spend it as soon as possible. (“I can’t tell you why, but I’ve got to do it soon!”) The slightly suspicious but more excited salesperson then goes for the close – at which I tell him that whatever he’s asking is way too little. “You must find a way for me to invest more than that!” I demand. He ups the ante. “That’s not enough,” I reply. We keep this up until he starts to laugh or hangs up.

Here’s someone that does the same thing with spam…